<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Property owners bribe their own communities]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by RicG</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/measure-37-madness/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:06:57 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/measure-37-madness/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Measure 37 as a retribution tool<p>Earlier this year, residents of an suburban Portland neighborhood known as Cedar Mill managed to persuade the Beaverton City Council to overturn a decision to permit the sale of a parcel of in the midst of a residential area to Wal-Mart (Some of the stories available <a href="http://www.topix.net/city/beaverton-or-cedar-mill" rel="nofollow">here). It was one of the most magnificent grass-roots battles I've ever witnessed. Now, the landowner, not content with the profits made on the hundreds of acres of new, high-density housing built on his land over the past few years, has struck back by submitting a Measure 37 claim for a multi-use retail/commercial/residential high-rise on the same plot of land. The <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/metro_west_news/116555191774760.xml?oregonian?wn&amp;coll=7" rel="nofollow">potential bill for the city? $51 million.<p>
For developers and land-owners, Oregon's Measure 37 has become a license to print money. For everyone else, it is spelling an end to some of the best land-use planning policies in the U.S. Never in the state's history has a law benefitted so few at such a high cost to so many.<br>
</br></p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Measure 37 as a retribution tool<p>Earlier this year, residents of an suburban Portland neighborhood known as Cedar Mill managed to persuade the Beaverton City Council to overturn a decision to permit the sale of a parcel of in the midst of a residential area to Wal-Mart (Some of the stories available <a href="http://www.topix.net/city/beaverton-or-cedar-mill" rel="nofollow">here). It was one of the most magnificent grass-roots battles I've ever witnessed. Now, the landowner, not content with the profits made on the hundreds of acres of new, high-density housing built on his land over the past few years, has struck back by submitting a Measure 37 claim for a multi-use retail/commercial/residential high-rise on the same plot of land. The <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/metro_west_news/116555191774760.xml?oregonian?wn&amp;coll=7" rel="nofollow">potential bill for the city? $51 million.<p>
For developers and land-owners, Oregon's Measure 37 has become a license to print money. For everyone else, it is spelling an end to some of the best land-use planning policies in the U.S. Never in the state's history has a law benefitted so few at such a high cost to so many.<br>
</br></p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>