<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Tip toe through the landmines]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Ron Steenblik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mccains-ethanol-dance/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 02:59:27 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mccains-ethanol-dance/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The refrain from the plains falls mainly on McCain<p>So we have one candidate who remains steadfast in his opposition to subsidies for ethanol, most of the rest of the field who are for them, and at least one who would increase them (at a cost to taxpayers between now and the year 2030 of <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/2/15/162850/512/#2" rel="nofollow">$380,000,000,000).<p>
I'd say we're spoiled for choice!</p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The refrain from the plains falls mainly on McCain<p>So we have one candidate who remains steadfast in his opposition to subsidies for ethanol, most of the rest of the field who are for them, and at least one who would increase them (at a cost to taxpayers between now and the year 2030 of <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/2/15/162850/512/#2" rel="nofollow">$380,000,000,000).<p>
I'd say we're spoiled for choice!</p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>