<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for What makes a good climate change plan?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by willa</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:20:45 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Names</strong></p><p>If I hear "McCain vs Hillary" or "Obama vs Hillary" one more freaking time...</p><p>
She has a last name too, y'all.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Names</strong></p><p>If I hear "McCain vs Hillary" or "Obama vs Hillary" one more freaking time...</p><p>
She has a last name too, y'all.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GreenMom</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:27:30 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This is very good</strong></p><p>Just one quibble - &nbsp;on #2 "Go broad", it would be worth it for you to note that going broader makes it harder to verify reductions. &nbsp;It's easy enough to know how much carbon is coming from a power plant stack or an industrial boiler -- but many other sources won't be monitoring or otherwise tracking the carbon as accurately, and funny business could be a real problem.</p><p>
On the other hand, abiding by rule #3 "Go to the source" will prevent some of those tracking woes.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This is very good</strong></p><p>Just one quibble - &nbsp;on #2 "Go broad", it would be worth it for you to note that going broader makes it harder to verify reductions. &nbsp;It's easy enough to know how much carbon is coming from a power plant stack or an industrial boiler -- but many other sources won't be monitoring or otherwise tracking the carbon as accurately, and funny business could be a real problem.</p><p>
On the other hand, abiding by rule #3 "Go to the source" will prevent some of those tracking woes.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by davidconnell</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:16:01 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mccain-vs-hillary-vs-obama-vs-bingaman-bernie-and-boxer/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Here, Here...</strong></p><p>Don't misconstrue this as an endorsement for Clinton, but jeez, it's awfully demeaning they way everyone refers to her by her first name. I honestly think it's subtle sexism -- like a woman is best referred to by her first name. (Although, it doesn't help that all her campaign materials refer to her as just "Hillary.") </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Here, Here...</strong></p><p>Don't misconstrue this as an endorsement for Clinton, but jeez, it's awfully demeaning they way everyone refers to her by her first name. I honestly think it's subtle sexism -- like a woman is best referred to by her first name. (Although, it doesn't help that all her campaign materials refer to her as just "Hillary.") </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>