<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Visiting oil rig, McCain calls again for more offshore drilling]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Zephaniah</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mccain/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:21:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mccain/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>media coverage</strong></p><p>How many times has Grist reported: "Sen McCain said..., calls for..., etc." compared to how many times "Sen Obama said..., calls for...." Sometimes the louder more aggressive kid gets more attention. Just wondering if this is happening even to the best of all possible news sites. <br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>media coverage</strong></p><p>How many times has Grist reported: "Sen McCain said..., calls for..., etc." compared to how many times "Sen Obama said..., calls for...." Sometimes the louder more aggressive kid gets more attention. Just wondering if this is happening even to the best of all possible news sites. <br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>