<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Mackey v. Pollan]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by meander</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 06:33:23 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Alternative to Times <p>Pollan has been posting his NYT pieces on his <a href="http://michaelpollan.com/article.php?id=79" rel="nofollow">personal website, usually a few days after they appear in NYT Select. &nbsp;His piece about the Whole Foods letter is <a href="http://michaelpollan.com/article.php?id=80" rel="nofollow">here.</a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Alternative to Times <p>Pollan has been posting his NYT pieces on his <a href="http://michaelpollan.com/article.php?id=79" rel="nofollow">personal website, usually a few days after they appear in NYT Select. &nbsp;His piece about the Whole Foods letter is <a href="http://michaelpollan.com/article.php?id=80" rel="nofollow">here.</a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Rufus</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:47:55 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>site</strong></p><p>I resent having to register just to post a comment here. What are you so damned afraid of?</p><p>
And if you want to post a longish post, just do it -- don't waste my time requiring me to click through page breaks. Page breaks are a waste of time, and they divert my attention. Wise up.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>site</strong></p><p>I resent having to register just to post a comment here. What are you so damned afraid of?</p><p>
And if you want to post a longish post, just do it -- don't waste my time requiring me to click through page breaks. Page breaks are a waste of time, and they divert my attention. Wise up.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by bookerly</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:12:48 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sourcing Organic Food<p><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ironically, developing countries are trying very hard to become Organic food suppliers to the developed world so that they can help lift themselves out of poverty.<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I understand the lure of the "eat local" movement, but what suggestions do people have for folks in the poorest nations? &nbsp;They are at the bottom of the economic chain, resource poor, agriculture is their main hope. &nbsp;What should they do?<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;It is also ironic, that the United States government is encouraging them to grow organics (through the ITC, link here.<p>
<a href="http://www.intracen.org/docman/PRSR1700.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.intracen.org/docman/PRSR1700.htm<p>
). And a press release from an American Embassy.<p>
<a href="http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_11/alia/a1111321.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_11/alia/a1111321.htm<p>
an FAO article here<p>
<a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/W9171E.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/W9171E.htm<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;I am not advocating an adoption of "industrial organic" measures. &nbsp;Merely wondering if there is any desire on the part of environmentalists to help eliminate poverty in the world, and wondering what they would suggest. &nbsp;Most of the information about "local farming" seems to be aimed at being better, more satisfied consumers. &nbsp;How does this fit in with the needs of the global poor?<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Here is a final link (from one of my favorite paper magazines, when I still looked at such things).<p>
<a href="http://www.newint.org/issue353/facts.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.newint.org/issue353/facts.htm<p>
patrick<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></p></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></a></p></p></a></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sourcing Organic Food<p><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Ironically, developing countries are trying very hard to become Organic food suppliers to the developed world so that they can help lift themselves out of poverty.<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I understand the lure of the "eat local" movement, but what suggestions do people have for folks in the poorest nations? &nbsp;They are at the bottom of the economic chain, resource poor, agriculture is their main hope. &nbsp;What should they do?<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;It is also ironic, that the United States government is encouraging them to grow organics (through the ITC, link here.<p>
<a href="http://www.intracen.org/docman/PRSR1700.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.intracen.org/docman/PRSR1700.htm<p>
). And a press release from an American Embassy.<p>
<a href="http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_11/alia/a1111321.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usembassy.it/file2001_11/alia/a1111321.htm<p>
an FAO article here<p>
<a href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/W9171E.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/W9171E.htm<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;I am not advocating an adoption of "industrial organic" measures. &nbsp;Merely wondering if there is any desire on the part of environmentalists to help eliminate poverty in the world, and wondering what they would suggest. &nbsp;Most of the information about "local farming" seems to be aimed at being better, more satisfied consumers. &nbsp;How does this fit in with the needs of the global poor?<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Here is a final link (from one of my favorite paper magazines, when I still looked at such things).<p>
<a href="http://www.newint.org/issue353/facts.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.newint.org/issue353/facts.htm<p>
patrick<p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></p></a></p></p></p></a></p></p></a></p></p></a></p></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Kif Scheuer</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:25:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/mackey-v-pollan/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Moving on the local distinction<p>David says <p>
 It's inevitable that some store -- if not Whole Foods, an upstart competitor -- will begin defining itself with local and artisanal foods rather than simply organic<p>
which reminded me of an NYT article on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/04/dining/04well.html?ex=1294030800&amp;en=c5f24b32d7d43337&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">local foods from January<p>
SIX years ago "organic" was the next big thing in grocery shopping, but the term has begun to lose its luster. It has been co-opted by agribusiness, which has succeeded in watering down the restrictions of the definition. Today "local" and "sustainable" are the new culinary buzzwords<p>
The article focuses on New Seasons Markets which have made a significant committment to local foods - apparently 27% of their stock. <br>
</br></p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Moving on the local distinction<p>David says <p>
 It's inevitable that some store -- if not Whole Foods, an upstart competitor -- will begin defining itself with local and artisanal foods rather than simply organic<p>
which reminded me of an NYT article on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/04/dining/04well.html?ex=1294030800&amp;en=c5f24b32d7d43337&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">local foods from January<p>
SIX years ago "organic" was the next big thing in grocery shopping, but the term has begun to lose its luster. It has been co-opted by agribusiness, which has succeeded in watering down the restrictions of the definition. Today "local" and "sustainable" are the new culinary buzzwords<p>
The article focuses on New Seasons Markets which have made a significant committment to local foods - apparently 27% of their stock. <br>
</br></p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>