<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Three key energy and climate questions and why conservatives just don&#8217;t get why they lost, part 1]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Forward...</strong></p><p><br>
The Democratic edict was a backward looking one.</p><p>
Americans are fearful, and they want protection.</p><p>
I can understand that.</p><p>
The McCain campaign was a backward-forward looking one...a pushme-pullyou where he seemed to want to say certain things, but the political climate made it...impossible.</p><p>
In the end, one must always move forward...one can never go backward.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Forward...</strong></p><p><br>
The Democratic edict was a backward looking one.</p><p>
Americans are fearful, and they want protection.</p><p>
I can understand that.</p><p>
The McCain campaign was a backward-forward looking one...a pushme-pullyou where he seemed to want to say certain things, but the political climate made it...impossible.</p><p>
In the end, one must always move forward...one can never go backward.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by featherfish81</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:37:10 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Free Market?</strong></p><p><strong>...the free market is still the most efficient means to allocate capital and human resources in an economy, and Americans know it.<br>
</strong></p><p>
Sure, I know it. &nbsp;But the free market is predicated on perfect competition and zero externalities, and those conditions don't really exist in any industry in America today. &nbsp;Although this feeling should make a carbon tax palatable to Republicans, because it utilizes the free market to make decisions about reducing carbon, though I doubt that it will. </br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Free Market?</strong></p><p><strong>...the free market is still the most efficient means to allocate capital and human resources in an economy, and Americans know it.<br>
</strong></p><p>
Sure, I know it. &nbsp;But the free market is predicated on perfect competition and zero externalities, and those conditions don't really exist in any industry in America today. &nbsp;Although this feeling should make a carbon tax palatable to Republicans, because it utilizes the free market to make decisions about reducing carbon, though I doubt that it will. </br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GreenMom</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:01:21 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I think you're absolutely right...</strong></p><p><br>
...and per your question #3 above -- I wonder if part of the reason for appointing Rahm Emanuel is that Obama recognizes that the Republicans who are left in Congress just aren't going to go along.</p><p>
If the minority is hell-bent on obstruction, why not hire a pit bull to clear them out of the way? &nbsp;Not a bad strategy, especially if you know you're going to have to counter the propensity of Pelosi and Reid to roll over at the first sign of trouble.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I think you're absolutely right...</strong></p><p><br>
...and per your question #3 above -- I wonder if part of the reason for appointing Rahm Emanuel is that Obama recognizes that the Republicans who are left in Congress just aren't going to go along.</p><p>
If the minority is hell-bent on obstruction, why not hire a pit bull to clear them out of the way? &nbsp;Not a bad strategy, especially if you know you're going to have to counter the propensity of Pelosi and Reid to roll over at the first sign of trouble.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Angelsnecropolis</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:49:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/losers-find-ways-to-lose/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bipartisan</strong></p><p>The republicans are notorious for obstructing legislation the people need and putting their own parties self interest ahead of the American peoples interests. </p><p>
Everyone want bipartisanship but when the other party doesn't care about what's best then how can you?! I say let the dems rule. Maybe then we'll get to pass good climate acts and environmental protections. Maybe then we'll get to have a better healthcare system, better education, better science education, etc...</p><p>
And I don't feel the Free Market, by itself, is the best option. There needs to be a leash on the beast or else it'll run wild with trying to get the most profits in the shortest amount of time and BAM we have a global crisis. There has to be some mandates and restrictions to keep the greedy corporate giants in check. Just look at the multi-million/billion dollar bonuses they receive. They put a cap on corporate salary and they bypass it with bonuses. Meanwhile they're now using tax payer money to go on thousand dollar golf trips and spa resort vacations. </p><p>
Until the republican party in senate can think about anyone but themselves then to hell with bipartisanship.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bipartisan</strong></p><p>The republicans are notorious for obstructing legislation the people need and putting their own parties self interest ahead of the American peoples interests. </p><p>
Everyone want bipartisanship but when the other party doesn't care about what's best then how can you?! I say let the dems rule. Maybe then we'll get to pass good climate acts and environmental protections. Maybe then we'll get to have a better healthcare system, better education, better science education, etc...</p><p>
And I don't feel the Free Market, by itself, is the best option. There needs to be a leash on the beast or else it'll run wild with trying to get the most profits in the shortest amount of time and BAM we have a global crisis. There has to be some mandates and restrictions to keep the greedy corporate giants in check. Just look at the multi-million/billion dollar bonuses they receive. They put a cap on corporate salary and they bypass it with bonuses. Meanwhile they're now using tax payer money to go on thousand dollar golf trips and spa resort vacations. </p><p>
Until the republican party in senate can think about anyone but themselves then to hell with bipartisanship.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>