<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Lily Tomlin was right]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:25:58 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Near Seattle,<p>you can now see a gigantic subdivision from Snoqualmie Falls. Until very recently, it was recently surrounded by forests. Eventually is will be surrounded by strip malls. 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Near Seattle,<p>you can now see a gigantic subdivision from Snoqualmie Falls. Until very recently, it was recently surrounded by forests. Eventually is will be surrounded by strip malls. 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by stevenearlsalmony</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:29:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dear Lily Tomlin and JMG...........<p>Thanks for your many wonderful comments, other efforts and for this opportunity to communicate openly about what to me looks like the proverbial "mother" of all global challenges: the human overpopulation of Earth in our time.<p>
It looks like humankind inhabits a tiny celestial orb that is miraculously set among of sea of stars. As far as we know, life as we know it exists nowhere else in the Universe. In the light of these one-of-a-kind circumstances, perhaps we of the human family have the responsibility of assuring the security for the future of life in our planetary home.<p>
I am trying to focus attention on the pressing need for human beings to protect and preserve the finite resources of Earth and its frangible ecosystems. If we fail to achieve this goal, then an unimaginably bleak future could await our children. In all the seriousness of what could be somehow true, I mean the children of my generation.<p>
If 6+ billion human beings live on Earth now and 9+ billion are expected to populate our small planet by 2050, then the human species simply cannot keep engaging in certain unbridled activities that we can see overspreading the Earth because the Earth has limited resources upon which all forms of life and human constructions like national economies utterly depend for existence. Without adequate resources and ecosystem system services of Earth, life as we know it and human institutions could collapse, I suppose.<p>
Now, some portion of the world's human population conspicuously over-consumes the resources of our planetary home. Other people, working in huge multinational conglomerations, are operating businesses in a way that recklessly scours the oceans' floor, decapitates mountains, turns biomass into human mass and, in these and many other ways, end up dissipating natural resources at such an alarming rate that the Earth has insufficient time to restore the resources for human benefit. Still other people in the family of humanity are overpopulating the planet. The leviathan-like scale and rapid growth of global human consumption, production and propagation activities are putting the Earth, life as we know it, and the human community in grave, clear and present danger.<p>
Elder human beings of the overdeveloped world, of whom I am one, are among the people in our planetary home who are ravenously over-consuming Earth's resources. We could choose to consume less. People in the developing could choose to limit overproduction of unnecessary things, to stop ravaging the planet, and to contain industrial pollution. People in the underdeveloped world could limit their number of offspring. Perhaps these are some ways the family of humanity begins to respond ably to the human-induced global challenges that loom so ominously before humanity in our time.<p>
While I certainly agree that action should have been taken by my generation of old folks when we were young in the 60s and 70s, when we became aware of the "population bomb," still we have responsibilities to assume and duties to perform, here and now, for the sake of our children, grandchildren and coming generations. <p>
The idea of making a conscious choice to do nothing in the face of the recognizably daunting global challenges that are visible before humanity on the far horizon is anathema to me.<p>
At a minimum, do we not have a "duty to warn" others of the potential for some kind of ecological catastrophe if the human community adamantly chooses to continue relentlessly down the current "primrose path" marked by soon to become unsustainable consumption, production and propagation activities now overspreading the surface of Earth?<p>
Always with thanks,<p>
Steve<p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br>
established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></br></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dear Lily Tomlin and JMG...........<p>Thanks for your many wonderful comments, other efforts and for this opportunity to communicate openly about what to me looks like the proverbial "mother" of all global challenges: the human overpopulation of Earth in our time.<p>
It looks like humankind inhabits a tiny celestial orb that is miraculously set among of sea of stars. As far as we know, life as we know it exists nowhere else in the Universe. In the light of these one-of-a-kind circumstances, perhaps we of the human family have the responsibility of assuring the security for the future of life in our planetary home.<p>
I am trying to focus attention on the pressing need for human beings to protect and preserve the finite resources of Earth and its frangible ecosystems. If we fail to achieve this goal, then an unimaginably bleak future could await our children. In all the seriousness of what could be somehow true, I mean the children of my generation.<p>
If 6+ billion human beings live on Earth now and 9+ billion are expected to populate our small planet by 2050, then the human species simply cannot keep engaging in certain unbridled activities that we can see overspreading the Earth because the Earth has limited resources upon which all forms of life and human constructions like national economies utterly depend for existence. Without adequate resources and ecosystem system services of Earth, life as we know it and human institutions could collapse, I suppose.<p>
Now, some portion of the world's human population conspicuously over-consumes the resources of our planetary home. Other people, working in huge multinational conglomerations, are operating businesses in a way that recklessly scours the oceans' floor, decapitates mountains, turns biomass into human mass and, in these and many other ways, end up dissipating natural resources at such an alarming rate that the Earth has insufficient time to restore the resources for human benefit. Still other people in the family of humanity are overpopulating the planet. The leviathan-like scale and rapid growth of global human consumption, production and propagation activities are putting the Earth, life as we know it, and the human community in grave, clear and present danger.<p>
Elder human beings of the overdeveloped world, of whom I am one, are among the people in our planetary home who are ravenously over-consuming Earth's resources. We could choose to consume less. People in the developing could choose to limit overproduction of unnecessary things, to stop ravaging the planet, and to contain industrial pollution. People in the underdeveloped world could limit their number of offspring. Perhaps these are some ways the family of humanity begins to respond ably to the human-induced global challenges that loom so ominously before humanity in our time.<p>
While I certainly agree that action should have been taken by my generation of old folks when we were young in the 60s and 70s, when we became aware of the "population bomb," still we have responsibilities to assume and duties to perform, here and now, for the sake of our children, grandchildren and coming generations. <p>
The idea of making a conscious choice to do nothing in the face of the recognizably daunting global challenges that are visible before humanity on the far horizon is anathema to me.<p>
At a minimum, do we not have a "duty to warn" others of the potential for some kind of ecological catastrophe if the human community adamantly chooses to continue relentlessly down the current "primrose path" marked by soon to become unsustainable consumption, production and propagation activities now overspreading the surface of Earth?<p>
Always with thanks,<p>
Steve<p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br>
established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></br></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:41:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>cynicism</strong></p><p>This bit, from the Christian Science Monitor article, is fairly chilling:</p><p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
An EPA spokesman in Washington declined to grant an interview or respond to e-mailed questions. A fact sheet about the proposed rule and a letter to Congress on the change were referred instead. "The proposed rules would provide greater regulatory certainty and reduce complexity without sacrificing the current level of environmental protection," the fact sheet says. </p><p>
&gt;&gt;</p><p>
Right.

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>cynicism</strong></p><p>This bit, from the Christian Science Monitor article, is fairly chilling:</p><p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
An EPA spokesman in Washington declined to grant an interview or respond to e-mailed questions. A fact sheet about the proposed rule and a letter to Congress on the change were referred instead. "The proposed rules would provide greater regulatory certainty and reduce complexity without sacrificing the current level of environmental protection," the fact sheet says. </p><p>
&gt;&gt;</p><p>
Right.

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:33:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>more reason for cynicism</strong></p><p>Underneath this cap of Lemon diet Snapple Iced Tea is written:</p><p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
"Real Fact" #327</p><p>
Chewing gum was invented in New York City in 1870 by Thomas Adams.</p><p>
SnappleandNYC.com<br>
&gt;&gt;</p><p>
This sort of thing makes us New Yorkers real proud. &nbsp;The cupcakes that we traditionally bake on Thomas Adams Day are world-famous.

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>more reason for cynicism</strong></p><p>Underneath this cap of Lemon diet Snapple Iced Tea is written:</p><p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
"Real Fact" #327</p><p>
Chewing gum was invented in New York City in 1870 by Thomas Adams.</p><p>
SnappleandNYC.com<br>
&gt;&gt;</p><p>
This sort of thing makes us New Yorkers real proud. &nbsp;The cupcakes that we traditionally bake on Thomas Adams Day are world-famous.

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:32:12 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ha!<p>Had nothing to drink before posting, I swear! Maybe I should have ...

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ha!<p>Had nothing to drink before posting, I swear! Maybe I should have ...

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by JMG</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:34:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lily-tomlin-was-right/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>GBS was right too</strong></p><p>P.S. &nbsp;Speaking of the divine Miss T, here's someone who anticipated her nicely:</p><p>
George Bernard Shaw</p><p>
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."</p><p>
(h/t to "Quotes of the Day")

<p>Save your community:  Cut greenhouse gas emissions 5% per year.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>GBS was right too</strong></p><p>P.S. &nbsp;Speaking of the divine Miss T, here's someone who anticipated her nicely:</p><p>
George Bernard Shaw</p><p>
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it."</p><p>
(h/t to "Quotes of the Day")

<p>Save your community:  Cut greenhouse gas emissions 5% per year.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>