<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for European cap-and-trade program gets a positive review]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Gar Lipow</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/lehman-on-the-european-union-emissions-trading-scheme/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:16:16 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/lehman-on-the-european-union-emissions-trading-scheme/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Emissions are not on target</strong></p><p>The point of ETS was NOT to put a price on carbon. That was the means. The end was to be a specific amount of emissions reductions from the nations participating. At the moment emissions are not on target for the Kyoto treaty. And I mean emissions for participating nations, not emissions worldwide for all nations. Further, many of the reductions that are &nbsp;credited are CDM. At least 20% of CDM is documented to fail additionality tests (f5 gases where emissions are increased in order to be decreased.) A great percentage of remaining CDM reductions are of doubtful additionality. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Emissions are not on target</strong></p><p>The point of ETS was NOT to put a price on carbon. That was the means. The end was to be a specific amount of emissions reductions from the nations participating. At the moment emissions are not on target for the Kyoto treaty. And I mean emissions for participating nations, not emissions worldwide for all nations. Further, many of the reductions that are &nbsp;credited are CDM. At least 20% of CDM is documented to fail additionality tests (f5 gases where emissions are increased in order to be decreased.) A great percentage of remaining CDM reductions are of doubtful additionality. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>