<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Pelosi confirms intent to maintain the House global warming committee; Markey stays on]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/it-is-my-intention-to-put-forth-a-renewal-of-that-committee/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:12:12 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/it-is-my-intention-to-put-forth-a-renewal-of-that-committee/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Obamaspeak dominates</strong></p><p>Is everyone going to start talking like Barack Obama now? &nbsp; </p><p>
To wit: Pelosi</p><p>
It is my intention to put forth a renewal of that committee</p><p>
She's not actually doing anything -- she's renewing a "committee". </p><p>
in the new Congress, in the rules for the new congress. </p><p>
It's new...it's green. &nbsp; It must be good.</p><p>
I have consulted in bipartisan way on this subject, and I intend to put it in the rules.</p><p>
In a bi-partisan way? &nbsp;Well, she is from San Fransico...and yes, she still hasn't done anything, but she will put it in the rules (cough, cough, meanwhile, dying of pollution...)</p><p>
I think we do have a need for one more term, because our work is not finished. We do not have the climate change legislation</p><p>
What work? &nbsp;You don't do any work...you renew things and put them in the rules. &nbsp; How about shutting down a coal plant and replacing it with hydrogen generators or some nuclear batteries? &nbsp; How about running your vineyard on a mini-nuke? &nbsp; Please, Lady, do something!</p><p>
that I had hoped we might be closer to, at least at this point. The committee serves a tremendous intellectual resource purpose for me to get the scientific basis</p><p>
Ye, Gods! &nbsp; She's babbling now! &nbsp; Did the plastic gel leak out and enter her brain stem?</p><p>
for how we go forward, and it is a big problem. It is as big as the world, literally and figuratively.</p><p>
What? &nbsp;What is a big problem? &nbsp; Committees that don't last until Doomsday? &nbsp; Or there not being enough "rules"?</p><p>
Chairman Markey has done a magnificent job, to use the word again. And I hope he will agree to serve in that position.</p><p>
Yes, please. &nbsp; Someone needs a good long rest...it might as well be Markey. &nbsp; </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Obamaspeak dominates</strong></p><p>Is everyone going to start talking like Barack Obama now? &nbsp; </p><p>
To wit: Pelosi</p><p>
It is my intention to put forth a renewal of that committee</p><p>
She's not actually doing anything -- she's renewing a "committee". </p><p>
in the new Congress, in the rules for the new congress. </p><p>
It's new...it's green. &nbsp; It must be good.</p><p>
I have consulted in bipartisan way on this subject, and I intend to put it in the rules.</p><p>
In a bi-partisan way? &nbsp;Well, she is from San Fransico...and yes, she still hasn't done anything, but she will put it in the rules (cough, cough, meanwhile, dying of pollution...)</p><p>
I think we do have a need for one more term, because our work is not finished. We do not have the climate change legislation</p><p>
What work? &nbsp;You don't do any work...you renew things and put them in the rules. &nbsp; How about shutting down a coal plant and replacing it with hydrogen generators or some nuclear batteries? &nbsp; How about running your vineyard on a mini-nuke? &nbsp; Please, Lady, do something!</p><p>
that I had hoped we might be closer to, at least at this point. The committee serves a tremendous intellectual resource purpose for me to get the scientific basis</p><p>
Ye, Gods! &nbsp; She's babbling now! &nbsp; Did the plastic gel leak out and enter her brain stem?</p><p>
for how we go forward, and it is a big problem. It is as big as the world, literally and figuratively.</p><p>
What? &nbsp;What is a big problem? &nbsp; Committees that don't last until Doomsday? &nbsp; Or there not being enough "rules"?</p><p>
Chairman Markey has done a magnificent job, to use the word again. And I hope he will agree to serve in that position.</p><p>
Yes, please. &nbsp; Someone needs a good long rest...it might as well be Markey. &nbsp; </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>