<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Here&#8217;s why the scientific community thinks so]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by swozniak</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:07:59 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good breakdown.<p>These are good talking points for any conversation about global warming. Good job.<p>
<a href="http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=71964&amp;m=1FNEN13&amp;c=elzwosdqtuayfmy" rel="nofollow">Here's a study I found that talks a lot about us being responsible for the surge in greenhouse gases.<p>
Shawn<br>
<a href="http://www.thegoodthebadandthegreen.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegoodthebadandthegreen.com/</a></br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good breakdown.<p>These are good talking points for any conversation about global warming. Good job.<p>
<a href="http://www.foodnavigator.com/news/ng.asp?n=71964&amp;m=1FNEN13&amp;c=elzwosdqtuayfmy" rel="nofollow">Here's a study I found that talks a lot about us being responsible for the surge in greenhouse gases.<p>
Shawn<br>
<a href="http://www.thegoodthebadandthegreen.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thegoodthebadandthegreen.com/</a></br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by jjwfmme</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:48:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ross Gelbspan has a page on this...<p>It sits on a firm foundation of peer-reviewed studies using a wide range of techniques.<p>
Ross Gelbspan has a page listing the top studies attributing warming to human sources:<p>
<a href="http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?id=3458&amp;method=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/...</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ross Gelbspan has a page on this...<p>It sits on a firm foundation of peer-reviewed studies using a wide range of techniques.<p>
Ross Gelbspan has a page listing the top studies attributing warming to human sources:<p>
<a href="http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?id=3458&amp;method=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/...</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Zarkov</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:25:44 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Client Science</strong></p><p>&gt;&gt; Finally, there is a new player in the climate game: human-emitted greenhouse gases. &gt;&gt;</p><p>
There is another more sinister player, also delivered by human activity that started around the Industrial revolution.<br>
Just the right timing, eh.</p><p>
This player multiplies with industrial activity and much more rapidly in wartime, and there has been a lot of that. &nbsp;<br>
Carbon Dioxide is natural, it has been on this planet since the beginning, it has been in far higher concentrations with no deleterious effects.</p><p>
But a micro layer of petroleum oil all over the seas of the world has never been tested before.<br>
Oh on dams etc it has and it inhibits the evaporation of water.... it reduces cloud cover which leads to global warming.... until it brings global cooling and severe drought and ....</p><p>
It could be that the warming in the middle ages is the baseline for our climate, we should have a more pleasant climate<br>
then came our excretions...and the climate has been oscillation ever since, with wider and wider swings.</p><p>
What is happening is not just a straight line effect, we are dealing with a swinging equilibrium.</p><p>
OIL, you can see why this topic is never brought up, and why client scientists murky the waters.</br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Client Science</strong></p><p>&gt;&gt; Finally, there is a new player in the climate game: human-emitted greenhouse gases. &gt;&gt;</p><p>
There is another more sinister player, also delivered by human activity that started around the Industrial revolution.<br>
Just the right timing, eh.</p><p>
This player multiplies with industrial activity and much more rapidly in wartime, and there has been a lot of that. &nbsp;<br>
Carbon Dioxide is natural, it has been on this planet since the beginning, it has been in far higher concentrations with no deleterious effects.</p><p>
But a micro layer of petroleum oil all over the seas of the world has never been tested before.<br>
Oh on dams etc it has and it inhibits the evaporation of water.... it reduces cloud cover which leads to global warming.... until it brings global cooling and severe drought and ....</p><p>
It could be that the warming in the middle ages is the baseline for our climate, we should have a more pleasant climate<br>
then came our excretions...and the climate has been oscillation ever since, with wider and wider swings.</p><p>
What is happening is not just a straight line effect, we are dealing with a swinging equilibrium.</p><p>
OIL, you can see why this topic is never brought up, and why client scientists murky the waters.</br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Zarkov</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 20:00:15 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/is-todays-warming-man-made/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>LOL, Full Stop</strong></p><p>omegafour.com</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>LOL, Full Stop</strong></p><p>omegafour.com</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>