<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Grim]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Benny Big Eye</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc-wgii-preview/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:20:48 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc-wgii-preview/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes, technology is going to make it all better</strong></p><p>If you don't believe me, then go read Pielke Jr.'s blog where he just broke the "adaptation taboo."</p><p>
What a brave man Pielke is; to boldly go where only industry has gone before.</p><p>
I sometimes wonder if any "technology solution" for global warming will become some future generation's "new problem." Remember, the greenhouse gases that got us into this mess resulted from us burning carbon to solve a host of problems which allowed us to modernize our society.

<p>Benny Big Eye</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes, technology is going to make it all better</strong></p><p>If you don't believe me, then go read Pielke Jr.'s blog where he just broke the "adaptation taboo."</p><p>
What a brave man Pielke is; to boldly go where only industry has gone before.</p><p>
I sometimes wonder if any "technology solution" for global warming will become some future generation's "new problem." Remember, the greenhouse gases that got us into this mess resulted from us burning carbon to solve a host of problems which allowed us to modernize our society.

<p>Benny Big Eye</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Thad Miller</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc-wgii-preview/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc-wgii-preview/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Posts on adaptation<p>Dave,<p>
I think this makes the previous discussion on adaptation all the more relevant -- <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/3/6/115722/7634" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/3/6/115722/7634. The people who are most vulnerable today to the impacts discussed in the IPCC WGII will not benefit from mitigation.

<p>Phd Student, IGERT Urban Ecology Fellow, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University</p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Posts on adaptation<p>Dave,<p>
I think this makes the previous discussion on adaptation all the more relevant -- <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/3/6/115722/7634" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/3/6/115722/7634. The people who are most vulnerable today to the impacts discussed in the IPCC WGII will not benefit from mitigation.

<p>Phd Student, IGERT Urban Ecology Fellow, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University</p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>