<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for IPCC synthesis report confirms global warming is a force to be reckoned with]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Propogation of Error</strong></p><p><br>
has synthesized three previous reports into one 70-page summary document and a 20-page summary of that summary</p><p>
So, therefore, any error in the initial reports is magnified that much more.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Propogation of Error</strong></p><p><br>
has synthesized three previous reports into one 70-page summary document and a 20-page summary of that summary</p><p>
So, therefore, any error in the initial reports is magnified that much more.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by wendypenner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:52:28 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Media blackout on climate change?</strong></p><p>Can someone please explain to me why there is no extensive coverage in the media of the UN report? It's almost a complete miss in the press. I also noticed virtually no mainstream media coverage of Powershift which I find shocking. </p><p>
If you've read any good coverage please post the links. I'd love to know who is publishing it.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Media blackout on climate change?</strong></p><p>Can someone please explain to me why there is no extensive coverage in the media of the UN report? It's almost a complete miss in the press. I also noticed virtually no mainstream media coverage of Powershift which I find shocking. </p><p>
If you've read any good coverage please post the links. I'd love to know who is publishing it.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by mspelto</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:39:20 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>BBC Coverage</strong></p><p>You have merely to read the first few pages of the summary report and examine the charts contained to see the significance. &nbsp;The BBC has the most reporting I have seen. &nbsp;A sobering report indeed.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>BBC Coverage</strong></p><p>You have merely to read the first few pages of the summary report and examine the charts contained to see the significance. &nbsp;The BBC has the most reporting I have seen. &nbsp;A sobering report indeed.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Pathos</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:55:39 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wendy,</strong></p><p>I'm afraid your question reveals a very dark and haunting truth about you: &nbsp;You live in America.</p><p>
American news sucks. &nbsp;It's not biased, so much as it is useless and full of irrelevant bull$#!!.</p><p>
I know, because I live in America, too. &nbsp;:)</p><p>
Mspelto (M. Spelto? Ms. Pelto? Misspelt-o?) is right; go with BBC. &nbsp;I won't say they'll tell you everything you need to know, but they do cover everything that's news.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wendy,</strong></p><p>I'm afraid your question reveals a very dark and haunting truth about you: &nbsp;You live in America.</p><p>
American news sucks. &nbsp;It's not biased, so much as it is useless and full of irrelevant bull$#!!.</p><p>
I know, because I live in America, too. &nbsp;:)</p><p>
Mspelto (M. Spelto? Ms. Pelto? Misspelt-o?) is right; go with BBC. &nbsp;I won't say they'll tell you everything you need to know, but they do cover everything that's news.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Andrew Dessler</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:41:44 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>IPCC needs to hire a media specialist</strong></p><p>One <strong>big</strong> problem w/ the IPCC is that they have released their AR/4 reports on Friday or Saturday. &nbsp;These are the absolute worst times to release news if you want to get coverage. &nbsp;I cannot figure out why they continue to shoot themselves in the foot by doing this.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>IPCC needs to hire a media specialist</strong></p><p>One <strong>big</strong> problem w/ the IPCC is that they have released their AR/4 reports on Friday or Saturday. &nbsp;These are the absolute worst times to release news if you want to get coverage. &nbsp;I cannot figure out why they continue to shoot themselves in the foot by doing this.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by wendypenner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:55:51 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes</strong></p><p>I agree with all but Andrew makes a great point. Why oh why did they release the report for the Satuday news cycle? &nbsp;Still-hard to imagine it didn't seem to be the lead story almost anywhere (Friday's NYTimes is an exception-but nothing on the front page Saturday or Sunday).</p><p>
I keep trying to imagine what sort of staged media event about climate change could ever attract the attention of the "cop kills wife" or "britney's acting looney" news. Maybe if we could get people to have group sex in their Priuses at a Hummer dealership would get some attention? &nbsp;How about a solar powered sex toys? Ideas anyone? </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yes</strong></p><p>I agree with all but Andrew makes a great point. Why oh why did they release the report for the Satuday news cycle? &nbsp;Still-hard to imagine it didn't seem to be the lead story almost anywhere (Friday's NYTimes is an exception-but nothing on the front page Saturday or Sunday).</p><p>
I keep trying to imagine what sort of staged media event about climate change could ever attract the attention of the "cop kills wife" or "britney's acting looney" news. Maybe if we could get people to have group sex in their Priuses at a Hummer dealership would get some attention? &nbsp;How about a solar powered sex toys? Ideas anyone? </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by trock</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:13:41 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/ipcc/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>ideas, sure lots of ideas</strong></p><p>Ideas, but would any of them get the information across that we need to get across. &nbsp;</p><p>
This is only a summary of the other 3 reports, so has already been reported. &nbsp;And the other 3 reports were in the summer, when it was hotter. &nbsp;We had cool breezes around here this week. &nbsp;</p><p>
global warming is just not funny enough. &nbsp;to much like work.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>ideas, sure lots of ideas</strong></p><p>Ideas, but would any of them get the information across that we need to get across. &nbsp;</p><p>
This is only a summary of the other 3 reports, so has already been reported. &nbsp;And the other 3 reports were in the summer, when it was hotter. &nbsp;We had cool breezes around here this week. &nbsp;</p><p>
global warming is just not funny enough. &nbsp;to much like work.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>