<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Interview with Jeff Goodell, author of Big Coal]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:27:08 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sequestration?</strong></p><p>Please ask him about coal gasification and CO2 sequestration, is it real and, because it is more <br>
expensive than just burning coal, will it be supported in the financial markets unless CO2 is taxed?</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sequestration?</strong></p><p>Please ask him about coal gasification and CO2 sequestration, is it real and, because it is more <br>
expensive than just burning coal, will it be supported in the financial markets unless CO2 is taxed?</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:04:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>4 cents per kwh<p><a href="http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/06/powerspan_co2_p.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/06/powerspan_co2_p.html#comments<p>
"The incremental cost of power production for CO2 removal is $0.04/kWh, and the cost per ton of CO2 removed is $47." <p>
How can coal with sequestration ever compete with wind power at 2 cents per kwh? &nbsp;When the sequestration alone, even without the cost of the fuel itself figured in is double the cost of wind.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>4 cents per kwh<p><a href="http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/06/powerspan_co2_p.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/06/powerspan_co2_p.html#comments<p>
"The incremental cost of power production for CO2 removal is $0.04/kWh, and the cost per ton of CO2 removed is $47." <p>
How can coal with sequestration ever compete with wind power at 2 cents per kwh? &nbsp;When the sequestration alone, even without the cost of the fuel itself figured in is double the cost of wind.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:51:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/interview-with-jeff-goodell-author-of-big-coal/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;default fuel for the 21st century&quot;</strong></p><p>Yes, David, ask away, about the lives of coal-miners first of all; about mountain-top removal and destruction of water sources secondly; and about our future dependence on coal, whatever it is likely to be, thirdly.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;default fuel for the 21st century&quot;</strong></p><p>Yes, David, ask away, about the lives of coal-miners first of all; about mountain-top removal and destruction of water sources secondly; and about our future dependence on coal, whatever it is likely to be, thirdly.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>