<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for I&#8217;m back]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by pazapparel</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:48:17 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Real Change</strong></p><p>The thing I don't understand...and this by no means is an endorsement....is why has no one picked up on the fact that a woman's energy in the white house would be radical change? </p><p>
It's absolutely terrific that a woman and an African American are in the running for the highest office in our land but really folks if the country wants real change and I mean REAL change wouldn't it makes sense to opt for a fresh female perspective? <br>


<p>Melinda</p></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Real Change</strong></p><p>The thing I don't understand...and this by no means is an endorsement....is why has no one picked up on the fact that a woman's energy in the white house would be radical change? </p><p>
It's absolutely terrific that a woman and an African American are in the running for the highest office in our land but really folks if the country wants real change and I mean REAL change wouldn't it makes sense to opt for a fresh female perspective? <br>


<p>Melinda</p></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Jay Alt</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:14:38 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Al Wynn<p>Here is representative Wynn's voting record on Energy, a committee on which he serves - <p>
<a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Albert_Wynn.htm#Energy_+_Oil" rel="nofollow">http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Albert_Wynn.htm#Energy_+ ...<p>
I am curious why it is deficient -<p>
Yes - to implement Kyoto protocol<br>
Yes - to continue ban on drilling in ANWR<br>
No - on schedules and on permitting of refineries<br>
Yes - to remove oil and gas subsidies<br>
etc, etc, etc, <p>
90% rating from LCVoters</p></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Al Wynn<p>Here is representative Wynn's voting record on Energy, a committee on which he serves - <p>
<a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Albert_Wynn.htm#Energy_+_Oil" rel="nofollow">http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Albert_Wynn.htm#Energy_+ ...<p>
I am curious why it is deficient -<p>
Yes - to implement Kyoto protocol<br>
Yes - to continue ban on drilling in ANWR<br>
No - on schedules and on permitting of refineries<br>
Yes - to remove oil and gas subsidies<br>
etc, etc, etc, <p>
90% rating from LCVoters</p></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:05:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yep Melinda</strong></p><p>Good point. &nbsp;</p><p>
What I sense behind Barack's very effective messaging is lobbyist friendly positions. &nbsp;on energy policy and healthcare.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yep Melinda</strong></p><p>Good point. &nbsp;</p><p>
What I sense behind Barack's very effective messaging is lobbyist friendly positions. &nbsp;on energy policy and healthcare.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:03:57 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;mostly green and blue runs&quot;<p>That presumably means something ...<p>
Lovely to have you back, DR, after your Saint Valentine's Day romp. &nbsp;Hot-tubbing strikes me as a rather over-rated form of West coast hedonism, but whatever. &nbsp;Whiskey at least is universal and timeless.<p>
(Actually, the choice of hot-tub-side drink matters a great deal. &nbsp;Many years ago, when I was a guest at a hot tub in Marin, the Beverage of the Hour was Armagnac. &nbsp;I do not think that would be my order today, but back then it hit the spot.)<p>
As for "Christ on a popsicle stick," that is a Eucharistic idea that I doubt would be of much interest to the Bishop of Rome; but it should not surprise us if the Archbishop of Canterbury were to find it very interesting indeed. &nbsp;It promises to add yet another bold application of that profound ecclesiological dictum, "Many are cold, but few are frozen."<p>
By the way, you write:<p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
I was up in a condo on Mt. Hood for four days .... &nbsp; The first day we spent on Timberline .... &nbsp;The next three days we hit Meadows ....<br>
&gt;&gt;<p>
Does that mean that a fair amount of driving was taking place? &nbsp;There is nothing wrong with that, necessarily, of course, but there are a few who might prefer to park the car at the beginning of a mountain holiday, then to forget it for the duration.<p>
Any wildlife sightings worth mentioning?<p>
On politics: Our understanding of the Potomac Primaries was indeed all the shallower for the temporary silence of your voice.<p>
Obama is growing on me -- and, on the other side, Hillary has begun a new disgusting chapter by seeming to insist that the Florida and Michigan delegates be counted, totally against any consideration of fairness -- , so I am not displeased by Obama's momentum.<p>
On the other hand, many of Obama's supporters are sadly carrying on with their narrative of obnoxious superiority.<p>
In yesterday's Sunday New York Times, at the top of the Week in Review section, Kate Zernike writes very nicely on the subject of the "cult of personality," with regard to Obama:<p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
Today that term is all around Barack Obama -- perhaps because there seems so little other way to explain how a first-term senator has managed to dazzle his way to front-runner in the race for the presidency, how he walks on water for so many supporters, and how the mere suggestion that he is, say, mortal, risks vehement objection, or at least exposing the skeptic as deeply uncool.<br>
&gt;&gt;<p>
See this, for the whole shpeel:<p>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/weekinreview/17zernike.html?_r=1&amp;ref=weekinreview&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/weekinreview/17zernike. ....<p>
Then, on the back page, see Dave Eggers' semi-facetious, semi-suicidal lament, "Losing to Idaho," on the way-deep uncoolness of his own California, usually at the leading edge of everything cool, actually going for Hillary on Super Tuesday, and so falling behind such dismal places, progressive-wise, as Idaho, Nebraska and Delaware.<p>
He tries to find consolation, at last, by thinking that his people up by the Bay were as cool and progressive and cutting-edge as ever, voting for Obama; but that the total California vote was weighed down by those unspeakable characters down in LA County.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></p></a></p></p></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;mostly green and blue runs&quot;<p>That presumably means something ...<p>
Lovely to have you back, DR, after your Saint Valentine's Day romp. &nbsp;Hot-tubbing strikes me as a rather over-rated form of West coast hedonism, but whatever. &nbsp;Whiskey at least is universal and timeless.<p>
(Actually, the choice of hot-tub-side drink matters a great deal. &nbsp;Many years ago, when I was a guest at a hot tub in Marin, the Beverage of the Hour was Armagnac. &nbsp;I do not think that would be my order today, but back then it hit the spot.)<p>
As for "Christ on a popsicle stick," that is a Eucharistic idea that I doubt would be of much interest to the Bishop of Rome; but it should not surprise us if the Archbishop of Canterbury were to find it very interesting indeed. &nbsp;It promises to add yet another bold application of that profound ecclesiological dictum, "Many are cold, but few are frozen."<p>
By the way, you write:<p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
I was up in a condo on Mt. Hood for four days .... &nbsp; The first day we spent on Timberline .... &nbsp;The next three days we hit Meadows ....<br>
&gt;&gt;<p>
Does that mean that a fair amount of driving was taking place? &nbsp;There is nothing wrong with that, necessarily, of course, but there are a few who might prefer to park the car at the beginning of a mountain holiday, then to forget it for the duration.<p>
Any wildlife sightings worth mentioning?<p>
On politics: Our understanding of the Potomac Primaries was indeed all the shallower for the temporary silence of your voice.<p>
Obama is growing on me -- and, on the other side, Hillary has begun a new disgusting chapter by seeming to insist that the Florida and Michigan delegates be counted, totally against any consideration of fairness -- , so I am not displeased by Obama's momentum.<p>
On the other hand, many of Obama's supporters are sadly carrying on with their narrative of obnoxious superiority.<p>
In yesterday's Sunday New York Times, at the top of the Week in Review section, Kate Zernike writes very nicely on the subject of the "cult of personality," with regard to Obama:<p>
&lt;&lt;<br>
Today that term is all around Barack Obama -- perhaps because there seems so little other way to explain how a first-term senator has managed to dazzle his way to front-runner in the race for the presidency, how he walks on water for so many supporters, and how the mere suggestion that he is, say, mortal, risks vehement objection, or at least exposing the skeptic as deeply uncool.<br>
&gt;&gt;<p>
See this, for the whole shpeel:<p>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/weekinreview/17zernike.html?_r=1&amp;ref=weekinreview&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/weekinreview/17zernike. ....<p>
Then, on the back page, see Dave Eggers' semi-facetious, semi-suicidal lament, "Losing to Idaho," on the way-deep uncoolness of his own California, usually at the leading edge of everything cool, actually going for Hillary on Super Tuesday, and so falling behind such dismal places, progressive-wise, as Idaho, Nebraska and Delaware.<p>
He tries to find consolation, at last, by thinking that his people up by the Bay were as cool and progressive and cutting-edge as ever, voting for Obama; but that the total California vote was weighed down by those unspeakable characters down in LA County.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></p></a></p></p></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></br></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:14:40 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Charles Barkley, new hero<p>Oh right, this was stupendously newsworthy:<p>
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/17/charles-barkley-slams-rep_n_87068.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/17/charles-barkley- ...<p>
It is always the right time to express disgust for Republicans, conservatives, and, especially, conservative Christians.<p>
It is good to stand up for women's reproductive rights.<p>
It is heroic, within the African-American community especially but really in homophobic America generally, to stand up for same-sex marriage.<p>
And, as a kind of lagniappe, it is pleasant to endorse Barack Obama.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Charles Barkley, new hero<p>Oh right, this was stupendously newsworthy:<p>
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/17/charles-barkley-slams-rep_n_87068.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/17/charles-barkley- ...<p>
It is always the right time to express disgust for Republicans, conservatives, and, especially, conservative Christians.<p>
It is good to stand up for women's reproductive rights.<p>
It is heroic, within the African-American community especially but really in homophobic America generally, to stand up for same-sex marriage.<p>
And, as a kind of lagniappe, it is pleasant to endorse Barack Obama.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!  So are fish!  So are other sentient animals!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p></p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:18:49 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Coolness</strong></p><p>Yep Canis, the trend is where it's at. &nbsp;Will there be any substance behind it this time?</p><p>
I guess it is time to start getting used to a Barack run. I still don't trust cool trends much.</p><p>
I sure was looking forward to first gentleman Bill making dimbulb limboobs keel over in their tracks daily. &nbsp;Oh well. &nbsp;</p><p>
I knew/know Wisconsin is going to go for Barack. &nbsp;The one time our primary vote counts. &nbsp;Please Barack, no "faithbased initiatives", that would be too raygun revolutionary.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Coolness</strong></p><p>Yep Canis, the trend is where it's at. &nbsp;Will there be any substance behind it this time?</p><p>
I guess it is time to start getting used to a Barack run. I still don't trust cool trends much.</p><p>
I sure was looking forward to first gentleman Bill making dimbulb limboobs keel over in their tracks daily. &nbsp;Oh well. &nbsp;</p><p>
I knew/know Wisconsin is going to go for Barack. &nbsp;The one time our primary vote counts. &nbsp;Please Barack, no "faithbased initiatives", that would be too raygun revolutionary.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by GreenMom</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:14:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks, Canis</strong></p><p>We're all home today - off for President's Day - and my middle-schooler quite enjoyed the Charles Barkley clip (though I had to explain who he was :-) ).</p><p>
FWIW, the kids are all for Obama. &nbsp;Too bad pre-teens can't vote.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks, Canis</strong></p><p>We're all home today - off for President's Day - and my middle-schooler quite enjoyed the Charles Barkley clip (though I had to explain who he was :-) ).</p><p>
FWIW, the kids are all for Obama. &nbsp;Too bad pre-teens can't vote.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by bookerly</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:42:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/im-back1/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>And on Charles</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; I didn't see the youtube clip, but don't forget he also endorsed gay marriage. &nbsp;His endorsement may be worth ten times as much as Al Gores, since he speaks to a different audience.</p><p>
patrick in Beijing</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>And on Charles</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; I didn't see the youtube clip, but don't forget he also endorsed gay marriage. &nbsp;His endorsement may be worth ten times as much as Al Gores, since he speaks to a different audience.</p><p>
patrick in Beijing</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>