<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Fleet of hydrogen concept vehicles crosses U.S. as part of Hydrogen Road Tour]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:45:59 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No plugin hybrids</strong></p><p>Here in the US except for those retrofitted against manufactureres wishes by third parties like Calcars. &nbsp;Foreign manufactureres know better than to even try to get them into the US market. &nbsp;</p><p>
Cheney thugs in the regulating agencies would use every rotten trick to scuttle them.</p><p>
But here is a whole tour of delay and diversion hype, cars costing 100s of millions to develop with no practicallity at all. &nbsp;All that money wasted to keep plugin hybrids from being mass produced.</p><p>
This is truly obscene. &nbsp;And the comments from the "experts" are pathetic.</p><p>
Good article exposing it all though Sara, thanks.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>No plugin hybrids</strong></p><p>Here in the US except for those retrofitted against manufactureres wishes by third parties like Calcars. &nbsp;Foreign manufactureres know better than to even try to get them into the US market. &nbsp;</p><p>
Cheney thugs in the regulating agencies would use every rotten trick to scuttle them.</p><p>
But here is a whole tour of delay and diversion hype, cars costing 100s of millions to develop with no practicallity at all. &nbsp;All that money wasted to keep plugin hybrids from being mass produced.</p><p>
This is truly obscene. &nbsp;And the comments from the "experts" are pathetic.</p><p>
Good article exposing it all though Sara, thanks.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:30:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Welcome To Hydrogen.Gov<p><br>
Nice to see Grist Ecologists are changing their H28in ways and manning up for the hydrogen economy.<p>
This road trip also shows states under the control of backward liberals such as Cantwell/Murray who have yet to take any steps towards participating in the 21st century hydrogen infrastructure.<p>
<a href="http://hydrogen.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://hydrogen.gov/<p>
Remember:<p>


Hydrogen cars can also use gasoline.<br>
Hydrogen cars can use ICEs or fuel cells.<br>
Hydrogen cars can run with only one engine.<br>
Regular cars and SUVs can be converted to Hydrogen (not all, actually later models with more ECMs may be more difficult).<br>
The Volt with have three models...including an all hydrogen model with a fuel cell.<br>
We are making rapid breakthroughs to create hydrogen from water with high efficiency. &nbsp;The argument of cost and backend pollution is not valid.<br>
The government recently opened up for bids for solid storage of hydrogen. &nbsp;There have been advances in using magneseum oxides and other.<br>
Hydrogen cars, liter for liter, are 3 times more efficient than gas cars.

</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Welcome To Hydrogen.Gov<p><br>
Nice to see Grist Ecologists are changing their H28in ways and manning up for the hydrogen economy.<p>
This road trip also shows states under the control of backward liberals such as Cantwell/Murray who have yet to take any steps towards participating in the 21st century hydrogen infrastructure.<p>
<a href="http://hydrogen.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://hydrogen.gov/<p>
Remember:<p>


Hydrogen cars can also use gasoline.<br>
Hydrogen cars can use ICEs or fuel cells.<br>
Hydrogen cars can run with only one engine.<br>
Regular cars and SUVs can be converted to Hydrogen (not all, actually later models with more ECMs may be more difficult).<br>
The Volt with have three models...including an all hydrogen model with a fuel cell.<br>
We are making rapid breakthroughs to create hydrogen from water with high efficiency. &nbsp;The argument of cost and backend pollution is not valid.<br>
The government recently opened up for bids for solid storage of hydrogen. &nbsp;There have been advances in using magneseum oxides and other.<br>
Hydrogen cars, liter for liter, are 3 times more efficient than gas cars.

</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p></p></a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:46:54 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Still fossil fuels...</strong></p><p>...the auto industry likes to tout that hydrogen fueled cars can be powered by hydrogen from water.</p><p>
While this true, it is much easier and much less expensive to aquire hydrogen from fossil fuels.</p><p>
Gee, I wonder which one they'll choose? ^rolls eyes^</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Still fossil fuels...</strong></p><p>...the auto industry likes to tout that hydrogen fueled cars can be powered by hydrogen from water.</p><p>
While this true, it is much easier and much less expensive to aquire hydrogen from fossil fuels.</p><p>
Gee, I wonder which one they'll choose? ^rolls eyes^</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:02:15 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>100% not good enough for you?<p><br>
While this true, it is much easier and much less expensive to aquire hydrogen from fossil fuels.<p>
I don't see how given the 100% efficiency of hydrolysis using the Nocera method.<p>
<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209900956" rel="nofollow">http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209900 ...<p>
A liquid catalyst was added to water before electrolysis to achieve what the researchers claim is almost 100-percent efficiency. When combined with photovoltaic cells to store energy chemically, the resulting solar energy systems could generate electricity around the clock, the MIT team said. <p>
And if it is possible to get lots of hydrogen from oil, and do it without producing CO2, then isn't that still a good thing? &nbsp;I mean, oil, per se, is not a bad thing -- it's the fact that we take this rich complicated molecule and...burn it! &nbsp;To me, this is like using a library for firewood...but that doesn't mean we can take the abiotic and super plentiful oil and use it in a more efficient way like stripping out the H2 and using those in fuel cells.</p></p></a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>100% not good enough for you?<p><br>
While this true, it is much easier and much less expensive to aquire hydrogen from fossil fuels.<p>
I don't see how given the 100% efficiency of hydrolysis using the Nocera method.<p>
<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209900956" rel="nofollow">http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209900 ...<p>
A liquid catalyst was added to water before electrolysis to achieve what the researchers claim is almost 100-percent efficiency. When combined with photovoltaic cells to store energy chemically, the resulting solar energy systems could generate electricity around the clock, the MIT team said. <p>
And if it is possible to get lots of hydrogen from oil, and do it without producing CO2, then isn't that still a good thing? &nbsp;I mean, oil, per se, is not a bad thing -- it's the fact that we take this rich complicated molecule and...burn it! &nbsp;To me, this is like using a library for firewood...but that doesn't mean we can take the abiotic and super plentiful oil and use it in a more efficient way like stripping out the H2 and using those in fuel cells.</p></p></a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:37:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>For crying out loud,<p>They are using the same arguments as the biofuel lobby.<p>
Anyone interested in how much energy and effort it takes to cool gaseous hydrogen to -423 deg F, which is what you have to do to turn it into a liquid, should read "Absolute Zero and the Conquest of Cold." Absolute zero, the coldest possible temperature in this universe, is -460 degrees.<p>
<a href="http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2007/solarhouse2_550x413.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2007/solarhouse2_550x413.jpg<p>
The above picture is a tank farm in an engineer's back yard. He filled them with gaseous hydrogen using a hydrogen generator powered by his solar panels. Using this new catalyst bailo mentions would only reduce the energy lost during electrolysis.<p>
They hold the equivalent of a single tank of liquid propane the size of a home hot water tank. Think about it. It would bankrupt him to try to turn it into liquid form and even in liquid form it takes four times as much space as gasoline to store the same amount of energy. What we need are renewable energy sources. Hydrogen is not an energy source. It is a battery. When combined with a tank it is an energy storage device. The energy source was solar. If we have any extra solar energy to spare it will go to displacing coal in power plants, not into gas tanks for twelve cylinder luxury cars. There may be potential to use hydrogen to store excess solar at a solar power plant, which can be burned in a turbine at night but liquifying it and moving it to distribution points for use in cars makes little if any sense.<br>


<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></br></p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>For crying out loud,<p>They are using the same arguments as the biofuel lobby.<p>
Anyone interested in how much energy and effort it takes to cool gaseous hydrogen to -423 deg F, which is what you have to do to turn it into a liquid, should read "Absolute Zero and the Conquest of Cold." Absolute zero, the coldest possible temperature in this universe, is -460 degrees.<p>
<a href="http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2007/solarhouse2_550x413.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.n.com.com/i/ne/p/2007/solarhouse2_550x413.jpg<p>
The above picture is a tank farm in an engineer's back yard. He filled them with gaseous hydrogen using a hydrogen generator powered by his solar panels. Using this new catalyst bailo mentions would only reduce the energy lost during electrolysis.<p>
They hold the equivalent of a single tank of liquid propane the size of a home hot water tank. Think about it. It would bankrupt him to try to turn it into liquid form and even in liquid form it takes four times as much space as gasoline to store the same amount of energy. What we need are renewable energy sources. Hydrogen is not an energy source. It is a battery. When combined with a tank it is an energy storage device. The energy source was solar. If we have any extra solar energy to spare it will go to displacing coal in power plants, not into gas tanks for twelve cylinder luxury cars. There may be potential to use hydrogen to store excess solar at a solar power plant, which can be burned in a turbine at night but liquifying it and moving it to distribution points for use in cars makes little if any sense.<br>


<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></br></p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 05:38:50 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>More questons...</strong></p><p>And if it is possible to get lots of hydrogen from oil, and do it without producing CO2, then isn't that still a good thing?</p><p>
Seperation of hydrogen from oil still creates CO2.</p><p>
Plus, there's still the pollution from drilling and processing.</p><p>
And the fact that as a non-renewable resource, it will still run out eventually.</p><p>
The Nocera method has also yet to be proven at a large scale over long distances in regular driving conditions.</p><p>
And it's still very expensive, unfortunately.</p><p>
Then there's also the fact that even if water were used for the process, it would take billions of gallons annually for just the United States alone. &nbsp;The water would have to be fresh and also fairly clean (requiring energy-intensive filtration).</p><p>
And fresh water isn't nearly as abundant as it used to be, so just how are we gonna sustain that amount of consumption?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>More questons...</strong></p><p>And if it is possible to get lots of hydrogen from oil, and do it without producing CO2, then isn't that still a good thing?</p><p>
Seperation of hydrogen from oil still creates CO2.</p><p>
Plus, there's still the pollution from drilling and processing.</p><p>
And the fact that as a non-renewable resource, it will still run out eventually.</p><p>
The Nocera method has also yet to be proven at a large scale over long distances in regular driving conditions.</p><p>
And it's still very expensive, unfortunately.</p><p>
Then there's also the fact that even if water were used for the process, it would take billions of gallons annually for just the United States alone. &nbsp;The water would have to be fresh and also fairly clean (requiring energy-intensive filtration).</p><p>
And fresh water isn't nearly as abundant as it used to be, so just how are we gonna sustain that amount of consumption?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:22:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>yeah amazin</strong></p><p>can you believe all the car companies that joined in on this? &nbsp;and there will also be a hydrogen Volt? &nbsp;Meanwhile, nobody seems to know how to make a plug-in.</p><p>
BioD, do you know if those tanks are very expensive due to the leakage problem? &nbsp;And I hope he's not in a fire prone area, if there was one those tanks would take out the neighborhood.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>yeah amazin</strong></p><p>can you believe all the car companies that joined in on this? &nbsp;and there will also be a hydrogen Volt? &nbsp;Meanwhile, nobody seems to know how to make a plug-in.</p><p>
BioD, do you know if those tanks are very expensive due to the leakage problem? &nbsp;And I hope he's not in a fire prone area, if there was one those tanks would take out the neighborhood.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by GRLCowan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:01:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Last I heard ...<p>Is it really true that <p>
He filled them with gaseous hydrogen using a hydrogen generator powered by his solar panels ...<p>
Last I heard, the solar panels were expected to make up for depletion of the initial load, which was due to Praxair or some such entity.<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, <a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&amp;rec_id=19452" rel="nofollow">H2 energy fan 'til ~1996</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Last I heard ...<p>Is it really true that <p>
He filled them with gaseous hydrogen using a hydrogen generator powered by his solar panels ...<p>
Last I heard, the solar panels were expected to make up for depletion of the initial load, which was due to Praxair or some such entity.<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, <a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&amp;rec_id=19452" rel="nofollow">H2 energy fan 'til ~1996</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:38:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I was making an educated guess GRL<p>I suspect you have the more accurate picture. That's a lot of hydrogen gas.<p>
I don't really know Jon, but I doubt if those tanks are any more dangerous than a liquid propane tank. Safety is one thing but the main issue with using hydrogen for cars is the horrific energy balance (once you liquefy and transport it) and usurpation of sources of electricity to make it.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I was making an educated guess GRL<p>I suspect you have the more accurate picture. That's a lot of hydrogen gas.<p>
I don't really know Jon, but I doubt if those tanks are any more dangerous than a liquid propane tank. Safety is one thing but the main issue with using hydrogen for cars is the horrific energy balance (once you liquefy and transport it) and usurpation of sources of electricity to make it.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by Sam Wells</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:54:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Every year ...</strong></p><p>Every year some college kids and some car companies get together for an August "fun run" across America and this year is no exception. Hey, if some big money and some kids think it's fun, let them have their fun. If it is commercially viable, like solar powered vehicles, well, that's not the purpose of these PR jobs. &nbsp;</p><p>
Every summer engineering kids get to build robotic vehicles, like for a Baja course, and yes we now have a hydrogen "fun run." So what? We know about energy density and upstream energy leakage and things like that. Let 'em have their fun, the PR fade away, and see what the market has to bear.

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Every year ...</strong></p><p>Every year some college kids and some car companies get together for an August "fun run" across America and this year is no exception. Hey, if some big money and some kids think it's fun, let them have their fun. If it is commercially viable, like solar powered vehicles, well, that's not the purpose of these PR jobs. &nbsp;</p><p>
Every summer engineering kids get to build robotic vehicles, like for a Baja course, and yes we now have a hydrogen "fun run." So what? We know about energy density and upstream energy leakage and things like that. Let 'em have their fun, the PR fade away, and see what the market has to bear.

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:18:11 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It's</strong></p><p>Almost hard to believe Jon. &nbsp;The mass delusion behind it all. &nbsp;Has human culture always run on self deception and mass delusion?</p><p>
Gotta hand it to Sara and the other Gristers who keep hammering on the mass media, count the articles from the staff and regular contributors on this topic of media acceptance of industry deception. </p><p>
It's the only place I know where this is the norm and not the exception. &nbsp;This makes Grist the best internet street corner for those of us frustrated by it to speak up.</p><p>
What's the name of that street corner in London where they have been ranting for centuries?

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It's</strong></p><p>Almost hard to believe Jon. &nbsp;The mass delusion behind it all. &nbsp;Has human culture always run on self deception and mass delusion?</p><p>
Gotta hand it to Sara and the other Gristers who keep hammering on the mass media, count the articles from the staff and regular contributors on this topic of media acceptance of industry deception. </p><p>
It's the only place I know where this is the norm and not the exception. &nbsp;This makes Grist the best internet street corner for those of us frustrated by it to speak up.</p><p>
What's the name of that street corner in London where they have been ranting for centuries?

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:19:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Proof of the Pudding...<p>You boys can H28 all you want, but vid this:<p>
Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdQRVQtffw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdQRVQtffw</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Proof of the Pudding...<p>You boys can H28 all you want, but vid this:<p>
Solar hydrogen home Michael Strizki<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdQRVQtffw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdQRVQtffw</a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:24:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Big Tanks To You<p>Biodiversificist,<p>
Those tanks are cool, but I don't think they'd fit in a Honda FCX Clarity, the hydrogen-only powered car that is being leased in california. &nbsp; We're talking something more like:<p>
&lt;img src="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/images/quantum_storage_tank.jpg"&gt;<p>
<a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/hydrogen_storage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/ ...</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Big Tanks To You<p>Biodiversificist,<p>
Those tanks are cool, but I don't think they'd fit in a Honda FCX Clarity, the hydrogen-only powered car that is being leased in california. &nbsp; We're talking something more like:<p>
&lt;img src="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/images/quantum_storage_tank.jpg"&gt;<p>
<a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/hydrogen_storage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/storage/ ...</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:27:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Speakers' corner<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speakers'_Corner" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speakers'_Corner<p>
There it is. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Speakers' corner<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speakers'_Corner" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speakers'_Corner<p>
There it is. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #15 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:27:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Increase Your H2IQ<p><br>
A lot of the Grist Ecologists make sweeping statements about hydrogen, without bothering to research the state of the art in gaseous technology.<p>
I invite you to "increase your H2IQ":<p>
<a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/education/h2iq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/educatio ...</a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Increase Your H2IQ<p><br>
A lot of the Grist Ecologists make sweeping statements about hydrogen, without bothering to research the state of the art in gaseous technology.<p>
I invite you to "increase your H2IQ":<p>
<a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/education/h2iq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/educatio ...</a></p></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #16 by Pangolin</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:28:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/16</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen is still dead<p>Jabailo that link you provided had absolutely no numbers about the relative energy, materials, and manufacturing costs of the hydrogen fuel system. Which means that it's all meaningless blather.<p>
There are better alternative energy storage systems available now from compressed air to flywheels to lithium-phosphate batteries. All of them &nbsp;are in use somewhere as installed solutions at market prices. <p>
Hydrogen just can't compete. It's propaganda used to distract from real solutions just like calls for "research" by politicians. 

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen is still dead<p>Jabailo that link you provided had absolutely no numbers about the relative energy, materials, and manufacturing costs of the hydrogen fuel system. Which means that it's all meaningless blather.<p>
There are better alternative energy storage systems available now from compressed air to flywheels to lithium-phosphate batteries. All of them &nbsp;are in use somewhere as installed solutions at market prices. <p>
Hydrogen just can't compete. It's propaganda used to distract from real solutions just like calls for "research" by politicians. 

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #17 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:39:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/17</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What is the Hindenburg?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;"Ironically disastrous energy boondoggles for 500 Alex."</p><p>
"Hydrogen as a majical energy solution is about to go down like this infamous airship."</p><p>
Your connection with reality may be in "Jeapordy" JB.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What is the Hindenburg?</strong></p><p>&nbsp;"Ironically disastrous energy boondoggles for 500 Alex."</p><p>
"Hydrogen as a majical energy solution is about to go down like this infamous airship."</p><p>
Your connection with reality may be in "Jeapordy" JB.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #18 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:33:46 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/18</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bailo</strong></p><p>You were the first commenter to link me to geothermal heat pumps (sorry amazin, must have been the timing), you are an effective advocate for bikes, and you live in what sounds like a well-functioning town (not an exurb). &nbsp;It seems to me that large scale batteries like sodium-sulfur could be very useful for storage, particularly in buildings. &nbsp;Any info on that?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bailo</strong></p><p>You were the first commenter to link me to geothermal heat pumps (sorry amazin, must have been the timing), you are an effective advocate for bikes, and you live in what sounds like a well-functioning town (not an exurb). &nbsp;It seems to me that large scale batteries like sodium-sulfur could be very useful for storage, particularly in buildings. &nbsp;Any info on that?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #19 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:23:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/19</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That's ok Jon</strong></p><p>Ground source heat pumps have been around for a long time, although direct circulation heat envelope heating and building mass cooling are possibly even more effective than heat pumps in most of the US.</p><p>
Down in the south where volatile weather has created heating demand, the ground temperature is warm enough to heat directly. &nbsp;In northern areas the ground temperature is still high enough to reduce haeting load to rqual the value of waste heat inside the building. &nbsp;</p><p>
Direct cooling is feasible everywhere except the southernmost areas of the US. &nbsp;In those areas heat envelope cooling can reduce heat pump cooling load to a small fraction of energy use.</p><p>
It's a good warning though, being mentiond in conjunction with Bailo twice now in 2 days, yikes!</p><p>
It's vacation season though, low internet traffic creates anomalies. &nbsp;At least I hope that's it. &nbsp;Hehey.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>That's ok Jon</strong></p><p>Ground source heat pumps have been around for a long time, although direct circulation heat envelope heating and building mass cooling are possibly even more effective than heat pumps in most of the US.</p><p>
Down in the south where volatile weather has created heating demand, the ground temperature is warm enough to heat directly. &nbsp;In northern areas the ground temperature is still high enough to reduce haeting load to rqual the value of waste heat inside the building. &nbsp;</p><p>
Direct cooling is feasible everywhere except the southernmost areas of the US. &nbsp;In those areas heat envelope cooling can reduce heat pump cooling load to a small fraction of energy use.</p><p>
It's a good warning though, being mentiond in conjunction with Bailo twice now in 2 days, yikes!</p><p>
It's vacation season though, low internet traffic creates anomalies. &nbsp;At least I hope that's it. &nbsp;Hehey.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #20 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:25:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/20</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You know</strong></p><p>I sometimes wonder about Bailo</p><p>


Does he really believe what he's saying<br>
Is he just some paid off astroturfer<br>
Or does he just enjoy annoying people



<p>-David Ahlport</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You know</strong></p><p>I sometimes wonder about Bailo</p><p>


Does he really believe what he's saying<br>
Is he just some paid off astroturfer<br>
Or does he just enjoy annoying people



<p>-David Ahlport</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #21 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 02:57:33 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/21</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Costanza (LD) principle</strong></p><p>

It's not a lie, if you yourself actually believe it. &nbsp;Many actually believe environmental activism is a liberal conspiracy, devoid of any underlying reality.</p><p>
&nbsp;Who would pay him for the worthless cr.. &nbsp;hmmm, on the other hand, "drug" limbaugh himself is wealthy enough to get actual (normal?) women to date him.</p><p>


3 &nbsp;Yep. &nbsp;You got it.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Costanza (LD) principle</strong></p><p>

It's not a lie, if you yourself actually believe it. &nbsp;Many actually believe environmental activism is a liberal conspiracy, devoid of any underlying reality.</p><p>
&nbsp;Who would pay him for the worthless cr.. &nbsp;hmmm, on the other hand, "drug" limbaugh himself is wealthy enough to get actual (normal?) women to date him.</p><p>


3 &nbsp;Yep. &nbsp;You got it.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #22 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:44:37 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/22</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Put Something Green Between Your Legs<p><br>
<a href="http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage9093.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage9093.html<p>
China has developed its first hydrogen-powered fuel cell mopeds and began exporting to overseas markets, a pioneering step to compete on the new and niche market.<p>
Shanghai Pearl Hydrogen Power Resource Technology Co Ltd said it has exported 30 fuel cell mopeds to since May this year, according to Steve Shi, its marketing director. This included 20 units to Spain through a local partner that served the World Expo in Spain this year. Others were shipped to United States and Britain.</p></p></a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Put Something Green Between Your Legs<p><br>
<a href="http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage9093.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage9093.html<p>
China has developed its first hydrogen-powered fuel cell mopeds and began exporting to overseas markets, a pioneering step to compete on the new and niche market.<p>
Shanghai Pearl Hydrogen Power Resource Technology Co Ltd said it has exported 30 fuel cell mopeds to since May this year, according to Steve Shi, its marketing director. This included 20 units to Spain through a local partner that served the World Expo in Spain this year. Others were shipped to United States and Britain.</p></p></a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #23 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:57:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/23</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Read the article, baka!</strong></p><p>...<strong>jabailo</strong>, read the article. &nbsp;Those fuel cells were for PEDAL-DRIVEN MOPEDS, <strong>NOT</strong> CARS!</p><p>
Wanna guess at the difference? </p><p>
And since only 30 of 'em were sold, I'm guessin' that even for mopeds they're too expensive to be viable.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Read the article, baka!</strong></p><p>...<strong>jabailo</strong>, read the article. &nbsp;Those fuel cells were for PEDAL-DRIVEN MOPEDS, <strong>NOT</strong> CARS!</p><p>
Wanna guess at the difference? </p><p>
And since only 30 of 'em were sold, I'm guessin' that even for mopeds they're too expensive to be viable.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #24 by trock</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:03:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/24</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen and fuel cells, bad efficiency<p>Here's a report done by a European Ulf Bossel, which pretty well explains why Hydrogen as a fuel isn't a good idea.<p>
Does a Hydrogen Economy make sense?<p>
<a href="http://www.efcf.com/reports/E21.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.efcf.com/reports/E21.pdf<p>
Look at the graphic which explains it all. <p>
The word about Hydrogen takes along time to get out. &nbsp;Or is it that the system of vetting ideas is not very good? &nbsp; Or do people just not look at things skeptically enough?</p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen and fuel cells, bad efficiency<p>Here's a report done by a European Ulf Bossel, which pretty well explains why Hydrogen as a fuel isn't a good idea.<p>
Does a Hydrogen Economy make sense?<p>
<a href="http://www.efcf.com/reports/E21.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.efcf.com/reports/E21.pdf<p>
Look at the graphic which explains it all. <p>
The word about Hydrogen takes along time to get out. &nbsp;Or is it that the system of vetting ideas is not very good? &nbsp; Or do people just not look at things skeptically enough?</p></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #25 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:53:39 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/25</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wake Up Rip Van Winkles -- it's 2008!</strong></p><p><br>
That report was in 2006.</p><p>
The breakthrough in electrolysis was in 2008...July 2008.</p><p>
In hydrogen technology years, the difference between 2006 and 2008 is like the difference between the 21st century and the 18th.</p><p>
You can't put in a link to a two year old report that has zero knowledge of the Nocera process and expect people to take your seriously....</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wake Up Rip Van Winkles -- it's 2008!</strong></p><p><br>
That report was in 2006.</p><p>
The breakthrough in electrolysis was in 2008...July 2008.</p><p>
In hydrogen technology years, the difference between 2006 and 2008 is like the difference between the 21st century and the 18th.</p><p>
You can't put in a link to a two year old report that has zero knowledge of the Nocera process and expect people to take your seriously....</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #26 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:27:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/26</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>2008 vs. 2006...</strong></p><p>...so then, if the technology is takin' off by leaps and bounds, then how many additional hydrogen-powered mopeds are there now?</p><p>
Two years later?</p><p>
After the first shipment?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>2008 vs. 2006...</strong></p><p>...so then, if the technology is takin' off by leaps and bounds, then how many additional hydrogen-powered mopeds are there now?</p><p>
Two years later?</p><p>
After the first shipment?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #27 by H2andYou</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:10:43 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/27</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen industry continues to make progress<p>The hydrogen road tour has created a way for people to better understand the differences of hydrogen vehicle technology, and the role it will play in the future. &nbsp;As a representative of the Hydrogen Education Foundation, I am helping people understand how hydrogen can help the US achieve a clean energy future. &nbsp;As a society, we need to collectively decide how to reduce our dependence on foreign energy imports. &nbsp;In order to achieve this goal, we must use domestic resources and develop an alternative energy infrastructure - guiding us towards a cleaner, sustainable energy infrastructure. &nbsp;<p>
Instead of seeking a single solution, a portfolio of energy choices will emerge in different ways all over the world. In some areas solar might make more sense, in others, wind or hydropower, and nuclear or coal might be used elsewhere - and all of these sources can be used to create hydrogen. &nbsp;Incorporating hydrogen within the world's energy portfolio will simultaneously reduce dependence on oil, while improving the country's carbon footprint by reducing greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. &nbsp;<p>
In the past several months, the industry has made several advancements. &nbsp;Here are few stories that highlight the progress made: <br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.h ...<br>
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell-hybrid-vehicle-hydrogen.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell- ... <br>
<a href="http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422<br>
Over the last several decades, we have witnessed different kinds of technologies evolve and impact our lives in ways we couldn't have completely imagined. &nbsp;Everything from cell phones to computers to televisions have evolved and improved in speed, reception, size and capabilities. &nbsp;This advancement in technology became possible through research. &nbsp;The same is true for hydrogen technologies today. &nbsp;Researchers will continue to explore, improve and diversify how hydrogen can impact our lives.<p>
To learn more about the benefits of hydrogen, we invite everyone to please visit and ask us questions at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.h2andyou.org" rel="nofollow">www.h2andyou.org. &nbsp;<br>
</br></a></p></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen industry continues to make progress<p>The hydrogen road tour has created a way for people to better understand the differences of hydrogen vehicle technology, and the role it will play in the future. &nbsp;As a representative of the Hydrogen Education Foundation, I am helping people understand how hydrogen can help the US achieve a clean energy future. &nbsp;As a society, we need to collectively decide how to reduce our dependence on foreign energy imports. &nbsp;In order to achieve this goal, we must use domestic resources and develop an alternative energy infrastructure - guiding us towards a cleaner, sustainable energy infrastructure. &nbsp;<p>
Instead of seeking a single solution, a portfolio of energy choices will emerge in different ways all over the world. In some areas solar might make more sense, in others, wind or hydropower, and nuclear or coal might be used elsewhere - and all of these sources can be used to create hydrogen. &nbsp;Incorporating hydrogen within the world's energy portfolio will simultaneously reduce dependence on oil, while improving the country's carbon footprint by reducing greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. &nbsp;<p>
In the past several months, the industry has made several advancements. &nbsp;Here are few stories that highlight the progress made: <br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.h ...<br>
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell-hybrid-vehicle-hydrogen.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell- ... <br>
<a href="http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422<br>
Over the last several decades, we have witnessed different kinds of technologies evolve and impact our lives in ways we couldn't have completely imagined. &nbsp;Everything from cell phones to computers to televisions have evolved and improved in speed, reception, size and capabilities. &nbsp;This advancement in technology became possible through research. &nbsp;The same is true for hydrogen technologies today. &nbsp;Researchers will continue to explore, improve and diversify how hydrogen can impact our lives.<p>
To learn more about the benefits of hydrogen, we invite everyone to please visit and ask us questions at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.h2andyou.org" rel="nofollow">www.h2andyou.org. &nbsp;<br>
</br></a></p></br></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #28 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:04:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/hydro-power/28</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>H2andYou<p>"... Foundation is managed by the National Hydrogen Association."<p>
Research is good. Product promotion, less so. The National Steel, Hydrogen, Orange Growers, etc, etc, Association just helping to educate the public on all the benefits of [insert product here].

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>H2andYou<p>"... Foundation is managed by the National Hydrogen Association."<p>
Research is good. Product promotion, less so. The National Steel, Hydrogen, Orange Growers, etc, etc, Association just helping to educate the public on all the benefits of [insert product here].

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>