<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for GreenPrint now free]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by GreyFlcn http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:15:10 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/1 Nifty

I was also looking for a handy way to convert files to PDF

Not bad

]]> Nifty

I was also looking for a handy way to convert files to PDF

Not bad

]]> Comment #2 by spaceshaper http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:12:27 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/2 Hate to be smug

but instant paperless printing to PDF from any application has been a standard part of the Macintosh OS for years.

The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.


]]> Hate to be smug

but instant paperless printing to PDF from any application has been a standard part of the Macintosh OS for years.

The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.


]]> Comment #3 by GreyFlcn http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:32:08 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/3 Yeah

And Mac's cost a lot more than PC's
Partially because of the cost of bundled software.

]]> Yeah

And Mac's cost a lot more than PC's
Partially because of the cost of bundled software.

]]> Comment #4 by spaceshaper http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/ Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:47:55 -0800 http://www.grist.org/article/greenprint-now-free/4 Not hardly.

Grey, on this one you're about five years out of date. Unless you're talking about a geeky kit-built PC. Against a reputable manufacturer like Dell, comparable hardware specs run you about even, the incomparable Mac software is a bonus. Mac peripherals will often will cost a tad more, but then you'll not need new ones as often as with Windows. And the latest OS (Leopard) runs happily on a 4-year-old entry-level iMac. I hear Vista is not nearly so accommodating.

Here's a link to a pretty balanced assessment:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/11/Mac-vs-PC-cost- ...

The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.


]]> Not hardly.

Grey, on this one you're about five years out of date. Unless you're talking about a geeky kit-built PC. Against a reputable manufacturer like Dell, comparable hardware specs run you about even, the incomparable Mac software is a bonus. Mac peripherals will often will cost a tad more, but then you'll not need new ones as often as with Windows. And the latest OS (Leopard) runs happily on a 4-year-old entry-level iMac. I hear Vista is not nearly so accommodating.

Here's a link to a pretty balanced assessment:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/11/Mac-vs-PC-cost- ...

The true meaning of life is to plant trees, under whose shade you do not expect to sit.


]]>