<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Where did the comparison start?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by gogreener</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:29:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Lyndon LaRouche<p>Here in Australia the LaRouche groups are claiming that environmentalism is synonymous with eugenics and Hitler. They frequently write letters to newspapers and infest internet discussions making these claims. <p>
Some of them were in the audience of a tv-debate over the screening of The Great Global Warming Swindle, there's a video of it on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeUiUDqEWXk&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarvatusprodeo%2Enet%2F2007%2F07%2F13%2Fthe%2Dmad%2Dbad%2Dand%2Dunhinged%2F" rel="nofollow">YouTube  (about 1min 30secs in, then 5min 10secs and 6min 20secs). They manage to drag Kepler and Prince Phillip into the discussion as well...<p>
However, when I look LaRouche up, it's hard to find his environmental stance in among his other... theories. So it may not be a major platform of his, although he's been around for ages.</p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Lyndon LaRouche<p>Here in Australia the LaRouche groups are claiming that environmentalism is synonymous with eugenics and Hitler. They frequently write letters to newspapers and infest internet discussions making these claims. <p>
Some of them were in the audience of a tv-debate over the screening of The Great Global Warming Swindle, there's a video of it on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeUiUDqEWXk&amp;eurl=http%3A%2F%2Flarvatusprodeo%2Enet%2F2007%2F07%2F13%2Fthe%2Dmad%2Dbad%2Dand%2Dunhinged%2F" rel="nofollow">YouTube  (about 1min 30secs in, then 5min 10secs and 6min 20secs). They manage to drag Kepler and Prince Phillip into the discussion as well...<p>
However, when I look LaRouche up, it's hard to find his environmental stance in among his other... theories. So it may not be a major platform of his, although he's been around for ages.</p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by gzuckier</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:47:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>larouche vs the greenies</strong></p><p>The Larouche organization is also a big force behind the 'rachel carson killed more people than hitler' 'ddt ban causes malaria' crap you see around. if you look at the article on wikipedia, for instance, there are people who post only to that point, and on the larouche page.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>larouche vs the greenies</strong></p><p>The Larouche organization is also a big force behind the 'rachel carson killed more people than hitler' 'ddt ban causes malaria' crap you see around. if you look at the article on wikipedia, for instance, there are people who post only to that point, and on the larouche page.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:32:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/global-warming-and-eugenics/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Crichton is an imbecile in sheep's clothing<p>For those of you who missed this review of his book, <a href="http://www.grist.org/advice/books/2005/02/01/roberts-fear" rel="nofollow">enjoy.<p>
"Third, and most distressing, the scientific establishment in both the United States and Germany did not mount any sustained protest."<p>
Scientists also failed to mount a sustained protest when the theory of evolution was first presented, which as any evangelical can tell you, was the root of the eugenics movement. Hmmm...<p>
That's right. Bonehead is advocating for real scientists to mount a sustained protest against the science behind global warming. You can bet your first born that had this dork been alive at the time of Darwin his article would have been calling for a sustained protest against the theory of evolution, using, oh, the debunked theory of something as proof that evolution was bunk.<p>
Bad ideas can propogate for short periods before being rejected. Eugenics was heading for rejection before Hitler came along. Eugenics would not be with us today, just as slavery isn't, had Hitler never been born.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Crichton is an imbecile in sheep's clothing<p>For those of you who missed this review of his book, <a href="http://www.grist.org/advice/books/2005/02/01/roberts-fear" rel="nofollow">enjoy.<p>
"Third, and most distressing, the scientific establishment in both the United States and Germany did not mount any sustained protest."<p>
Scientists also failed to mount a sustained protest when the theory of evolution was first presented, which as any evangelical can tell you, was the root of the eugenics movement. Hmmm...<p>
That's right. Bonehead is advocating for real scientists to mount a sustained protest against the science behind global warming. You can bet your first born that had this dork been alive at the time of Darwin his article would have been calling for a sustained protest against the theory of evolution, using, oh, the debunked theory of something as proof that evolution was bunk.<p>
Bad ideas can propogate for short periods before being rejected. Eugenics was heading for rejection before Hitler came along. Eugenics would not be with us today, just as slavery isn't, had Hitler never been born.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>