<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Global carbon emissions jumped 3 percent in 2007]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sindark</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/gassing-up-the-atmosphere/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:20:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/gassing-up-the-atmosphere/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Needs to change from rising to falling<p>This is highly disturbing. Keeping temperatures from increasing by more than 2&#176;C requires the deep and rapid reduction of global emissions, so as to achieve stabilization at a relatively low concentration of greenhouse gasses. Using IPCC models, it can be estimated that the chances of avoiding a rise of over 2&#176;C if atmospheric concentrations stabilize at 550 ppm are 15%. Even with stabilization at 450 ppm, the chances are only 50%. Stabilizing at 450 ppm would require that global emissions peak by 2010 and fall by 7% per year thereafter, falling to 70% below 2005 values by 2050. Stabilization scenarios with a lower probability of exceeding the 2&#176;C require even more rapid cuts. The climatic effect of emissions reductions is the product of both their depth and their duration; delaying the timing of emissions reductions significantly increases the depth they must have, in order to produce the same climatic outcome.

<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/" rel="nofollow">a sibilant intake of breath</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Needs to change from rising to falling<p>This is highly disturbing. Keeping temperatures from increasing by more than 2&#176;C requires the deep and rapid reduction of global emissions, so as to achieve stabilization at a relatively low concentration of greenhouse gasses. Using IPCC models, it can be estimated that the chances of avoiding a rise of over 2&#176;C if atmospheric concentrations stabilize at 550 ppm are 15%. Even with stabilization at 450 ppm, the chances are only 50%. Stabilizing at 450 ppm would require that global emissions peak by 2010 and fall by 7% per year thereafter, falling to 70% below 2005 values by 2050. Stabilization scenarios with a lower probability of exceeding the 2&#176;C require even more rapid cuts. The climatic effect of emissions reductions is the product of both their depth and their duration; delaying the timing of emissions reductions significantly increases the depth they must have, in order to produce the same climatic outcome.

<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/" rel="nofollow">a sibilant intake of breath</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>