<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for FOX in thrall to Kennedy and Clinton?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Kit Stolz</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/fox-in-thrall-to-kennedy-and-clinton/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:55:43 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/fox-in-thrall-to-kennedy-and-clinton/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Fox in Thrall<p>I posted an item on my site (<a href="http://www.achangeinthewind.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.achangeinthewind.com) on this interesting development for FOXNews. I'll post just the conclusion here:<p>
FOXNews is tightly tied in the public perception to a President and a political party whose approval ratings are plummeting. Mightn't covering global warming be a conveniently non-political way for FOX to show its independence of the failing Bush administration? <p>
Posted by Kit Stolz on 11/18/2005 | Permalink<br>
</br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Fox in Thrall<p>I posted an item on my site (<a href="http://www.achangeinthewind.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.achangeinthewind.com) on this interesting development for FOXNews. I'll post just the conclusion here:<p>
FOXNews is tightly tied in the public perception to a President and a political party whose approval ratings are plummeting. Mightn't covering global warming be a conveniently non-political way for FOX to show its independence of the failing Bush administration? <p>
Posted by Kit Stolz on 11/18/2005 | Permalink<br>
</br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by jdhlax</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/fox-in-thrall-to-kennedy-and-clinton/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:01:45 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/fox-in-thrall-to-kennedy-and-clinton/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hillary Clinton</strong></p><p>Speaking strictly tactically, I think the right's bashing of Hillary Clinton is a brilliant tactic. &nbsp;The Clintons are right wing Democrats who are socially liberal. &nbsp;(Right wing means support of those with power. &nbsp;The terms "right" and "left" referring to political affiliations come from "righthanded" and "lefthanded," the former being a far higher percentage of the human population, and thus having much more power.)</p><p>
The Clintons are very pro-corporate, so they don't threaten the power elite. &nbsp;Hillary is even pro-Iraq war. &nbsp;By portraying Hillary Clinton as some raging commie or whatever, the right makes a right wing Democrat seem as if she's way off the radar by being too far to the left. &nbsp;This has the effect of portraying actual liberal Democrats or more progressive types like Greens as extreme radicals who aren't even worth listening to.

<p>Jeff Hoffman</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hillary Clinton</strong></p><p>Speaking strictly tactically, I think the right's bashing of Hillary Clinton is a brilliant tactic. &nbsp;The Clintons are right wing Democrats who are socially liberal. &nbsp;(Right wing means support of those with power. &nbsp;The terms "right" and "left" referring to political affiliations come from "righthanded" and "lefthanded," the former being a far higher percentage of the human population, and thus having much more power.)</p><p>
The Clintons are very pro-corporate, so they don't threaten the power elite. &nbsp;Hillary is even pro-Iraq war. &nbsp;By portraying Hillary Clinton as some raging commie or whatever, the right makes a right wing Democrat seem as if she's way off the radar by being too far to the left. &nbsp;This has the effect of portraying actual liberal Democrats or more progressive types like Greens as extreme radicals who aren't even worth listening to.

<p>Jeff Hoffman</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>