<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Department of Energy flushes $15 million down the hydrogen toilet]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Gar Lipow</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:19:11 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>cellulosic ethanol</strong></p><p>Is cellulosic ethanol really closer than hydrogen? I thought that like hydrogen there are a large number of steps to make it work - not to mention the question of what to use as feedstock. (One thing I have against CE is that if we do get it developed, I suspect the feedstock will be coal.)</p><p>
Advanced batteries, deployment of plugins sure. Cellulosic ethanol - I'm not so sure. &nbsp;But maybe you have an argument to make why CE criticism unlike hydrogen criticism goes too far. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>cellulosic ethanol</strong></p><p>Is cellulosic ethanol really closer than hydrogen? I thought that like hydrogen there are a large number of steps to make it work - not to mention the question of what to use as feedstock. (One thing I have against CE is that if we do get it developed, I suspect the feedstock will be coal.)</p><p>
Advanced batteries, deployment of plugins sure. Cellulosic ethanol - I'm not so sure. &nbsp;But maybe you have an argument to make why CE criticism unlike hydrogen criticism goes too far. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by salemguy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:06:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Re: cellulosic ethanol</strong></p><p>Gar, </p><p>
I think you have some things confused. Cellulosic ethanol has nothing to do with coal. Liquid coal fuels are indeed inefficient and big GHG producers, given how they must be produced. Cellulosic ethanol on the other hand is most efficiently produced from plant materials and garbage... long before it becomes coal. </p><p>
How are you connecting coal and cellulosic ethanol? </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Re: cellulosic ethanol</strong></p><p>Gar, </p><p>
I think you have some things confused. Cellulosic ethanol has nothing to do with coal. Liquid coal fuels are indeed inefficient and big GHG producers, given how they must be produced. Cellulosic ethanol on the other hand is most efficiently produced from plant materials and garbage... long before it becomes coal. </p><p>
How are you connecting coal and cellulosic ethanol? </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:44:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Easy<p>How are you connecting coal and cellulosic ethanol? <p>
Oh, thats actually rather easy.<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/coskata" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/coskata<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/biolimits.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/biolimits.png<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/fossilenergy.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/fossilenergy.png<p>
Also, for bonus points, you might want to check these out.<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/R-squared/~3/367327701/coskata-dead-man-walking.html" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/R-squared/~3/367327701/cos ...<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/algae4" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/algae4

<p>-David Ahlport</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Easy<p>How are you connecting coal and cellulosic ethanol? <p>
Oh, thats actually rather easy.<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/coskata" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/coskata<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/biolimits.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/biolimits.png<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/fossilenergy.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/fossilenergy.png<p>
Also, for bonus points, you might want to check these out.<br>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/R-squared/~3/367327701/coskata-dead-man-walking.html" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/R-squared/~3/367327701/cos ...<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/algae4" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/algae4

<p>-David Ahlport</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:10:12 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oh yes<p>And while we're talking about the concept of "Don't worry, the waste will handle it".<p>
I'd answer, "What Waste?"<p>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/7/16/112158/855" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/7/16/112158/855<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/peaksoil.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/peaksoil.pdf<br>
<a href="http://www.stopbp-berkeley.org/CellulosicBiofuels.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stopbp-berkeley.org/CellulosicBiofuels.pdf<br>


<p>-David Ahlport</p></br></a></br></a></br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Oh yes<p>And while we're talking about the concept of "Don't worry, the waste will handle it".<p>
I'd answer, "What Waste?"<p>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/7/16/112158/855" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/7/16/112158/855<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/peaksoil.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/peaksoil.pdf<br>
<a href="http://www.stopbp-berkeley.org/CellulosicBiofuels.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stopbp-berkeley.org/CellulosicBiofuels.pdf<br>


<p>-David Ahlport</p></br></a></br></a></br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:32:29 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>T. Boone?</strong></p><p><br>
Hey, maybe T. Boone can bid on this...oops...he lost all his money on wind...</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>T. Boone?</strong></p><p><br>
Hey, maybe T. Boone can bid on this...oops...he lost all his money on wind...</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:07:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Strange mention of CE</strong></p><p>Well I just happened to have mentioned nano metal hydride hydrogen storage here recently. &nbsp;Methane nano tech storage seems to be working nicely, that should get the research dollars instead.</p><p>
Yes hydrogen is useless as an energy storage medium. &nbsp;But as with all the other useless technologies like CE, nuclear power, coal to lquid, clean coal, throwing a few million at them to shut the various lobbyists up is a good idea.</p><p>
Luckily these scammers only got 15 million. &nbsp;What will a few experimental nukes cost? &nbsp;50 billion? &nbsp;Experimental CE? &nbsp;5 billion? &nbsp;Yikes. &nbsp;What a mess.</p><p>
It's not helpful at all that Joe is touting CE. Is he looking for a spot in an Obama administration? &nbsp;Modern political correctness cultivates corn state votes, and coal state votes. &nbsp;And nuclear industry money. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Strange mention of CE</strong></p><p>Well I just happened to have mentioned nano metal hydride hydrogen storage here recently. &nbsp;Methane nano tech storage seems to be working nicely, that should get the research dollars instead.</p><p>
Yes hydrogen is useless as an energy storage medium. &nbsp;But as with all the other useless technologies like CE, nuclear power, coal to lquid, clean coal, throwing a few million at them to shut the various lobbyists up is a good idea.</p><p>
Luckily these scammers only got 15 million. &nbsp;What will a few experimental nukes cost? &nbsp;50 billion? &nbsp;Experimental CE? &nbsp;5 billion? &nbsp;Yikes. &nbsp;What a mess.</p><p>
It's not helpful at all that Joe is touting CE. Is he looking for a spot in an Obama administration? &nbsp;Modern political correctness cultivates corn state votes, and coal state votes. &nbsp;And nuclear industry money. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 15:01:59 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>30 mill for plugin hybrids<p><a href="http://www.doe.gov/news/6337.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.doe.gov/news/6337.htm<p>
"U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Andy Karsner today announced up to $30 million in funding over three years for three cost-shared Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) demonstration and development projects. The selected projects will accelerate the development of PHEVs capable of traveling up to 40 miles without recharging, which includes most daily roundtrip commutes and satisfies 70 percent of the average daily travel in the U. S."<p>
This is a better way to spend money. &nbsp;I believe the average daily trip length is 21 miles though. &nbsp;Making this figure of 40 miles saving 70% somewhat hard to understand. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>30 mill for plugin hybrids<p><a href="http://www.doe.gov/news/6337.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.doe.gov/news/6337.htm<p>
"U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Andy Karsner today announced up to $30 million in funding over three years for three cost-shared Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) demonstration and development projects. The selected projects will accelerate the development of PHEVs capable of traveling up to 40 miles without recharging, which includes most daily roundtrip commutes and satisfies 70 percent of the average daily travel in the U. S."<p>
This is a better way to spend money. &nbsp;I believe the average daily trip length is 21 miles though. &nbsp;Making this figure of 40 miles saving 70% somewhat hard to understand. &nbsp;

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin</p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:24:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>WMDs...</strong></p><p>...sounds like several of those projects are aimed more at hydrogen as a military use (possibly weapons), more than for civilian vehicular use.</p><p>
Then again, since when did Los Alamos care 'bout emissions standards (or the humans that drive 'em, for that matter?)</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>WMDs...</strong></p><p>...sounds like several of those projects are aimed more at hydrogen as a military use (possibly weapons), more than for civilian vehicular use.</p><p>
Then again, since when did Los Alamos care 'bout emissions standards (or the humans that drive 'em, for that matter?)</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by sindark</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:40:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen<p>We can only wonder how long it will be before car companies and governments accept that <a href="http://www.sindark.com/2008/06/19/fuel-cells-are-a-pipe-dream/" rel="nofollow">hydrogen is a pipe dream and move on to more promising technologies like battery-powered electric vehicles.

<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/" rel="nofollow">a sibilant intake of breath</a></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydrogen<p>We can only wonder how long it will be before car companies and governments accept that <a href="http://www.sindark.com/2008/06/19/fuel-cells-are-a-pipe-dream/" rel="nofollow">hydrogen is a pipe dream and move on to more promising technologies like battery-powered electric vehicles.

<p><a href="http://www.sindark.com/" rel="nofollow">a sibilant intake of breath</a></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by Bob Wallace</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:52:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Research is good...</strong></p><p>Personally I can't see us driving hydrogen fuel cell cars. &nbsp;But I can't guarantee it.</p><p>
But I'm in favor of spending 'reasonable' amounts on researching almost everything and hydrogen fuel cells fall into that category. &nbsp;</p><p>
Businesses aren't good at funding 'pure' research, the sort of stuff that isn't likely to produce a marketable product in the near future, that's a chore largely left to governments. &nbsp;</p><p>
Let's spend a few million on hydrogen/fuel cells and see where it might take us. &nbsp;</p><p>
At the same time, let's spend all that's needed to bring promising solutions to the market. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Research is good...</strong></p><p>Personally I can't see us driving hydrogen fuel cell cars. &nbsp;But I can't guarantee it.</p><p>
But I'm in favor of spending 'reasonable' amounts on researching almost everything and hydrogen fuel cells fall into that category. &nbsp;</p><p>
Businesses aren't good at funding 'pure' research, the sort of stuff that isn't likely to produce a marketable product in the near future, that's a chore largely left to governments. &nbsp;</p><p>
Let's spend a few million on hydrogen/fuel cells and see where it might take us. &nbsp;</p><p>
At the same time, let's spend all that's needed to bring promising solutions to the market. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by Sean Casten</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:01:08 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It is at least re-assuring to see</strong></p><p>That all the $ is going to H2 storage, as that is the critical path. &nbsp;I'd disagree with Gar that there are a lot of technical glitches - there's simply one massive one with hydrogen: no one knows whether you can store it cost effectively. &nbsp;(Indeed, most don't even know what the fundamental scientific principles are that will enable cost-effective storage.) &nbsp;And if you can't store hydrogen, you certainly can't make it from renewables. &nbsp;(No reason why you'd turn solar into electric to make hydrogen and then turn the hydrogen back into electric on the spot.) &nbsp;And you certainly can't use it as a transport fuel.</p><p>
It's small comfort, but compared to past research budgets that were addressing all sorts of other problems that were downstream, I'm at least glad to see the focus.</p><p>
Re: cellulosic and coal, all I can say is "huh?" &nbsp;That just doesn't pencil. &nbsp;Cellulosics are like a sugarcane mill, in the sense that the sugar comes "prepackaged" with it's fuel, in the form of all the woody bits around the sugar (lignin, etc.) &nbsp;Indeed, this gives a cellulosic ethanol plant an inherently (much) smaller carbon foot print than a corn ethanol plant.</p><p>
There are legitimate challenges getting the cellulose broken down into a fermentable form, but the cellulose:coal link just doesn't add up.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It is at least re-assuring to see</strong></p><p>That all the $ is going to H2 storage, as that is the critical path. &nbsp;I'd disagree with Gar that there are a lot of technical glitches - there's simply one massive one with hydrogen: no one knows whether you can store it cost effectively. &nbsp;(Indeed, most don't even know what the fundamental scientific principles are that will enable cost-effective storage.) &nbsp;And if you can't store hydrogen, you certainly can't make it from renewables. &nbsp;(No reason why you'd turn solar into electric to make hydrogen and then turn the hydrogen back into electric on the spot.) &nbsp;And you certainly can't use it as a transport fuel.</p><p>
It's small comfort, but compared to past research budgets that were addressing all sorts of other problems that were downstream, I'm at least glad to see the focus.</p><p>
Re: cellulosic and coal, all I can say is "huh?" &nbsp;That just doesn't pencil. &nbsp;Cellulosics are like a sugarcane mill, in the sense that the sugar comes "prepackaged" with it's fuel, in the form of all the woody bits around the sugar (lignin, etc.) &nbsp;Indeed, this gives a cellulosic ethanol plant an inherently (much) smaller carbon foot print than a corn ethanol plant.</p><p>
There are legitimate challenges getting the cellulose broken down into a fermentable form, but the cellulose:coal link just doesn't add up.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by GRLCowan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:07:50 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How LONG, you say?<p>We can only wonder how long it will be before car companies and governments accept that hydrogen is a pipe dream &nbsp;...<p>
I believe it's about minus-seven years for the latter. The car companies just go along with the charade. They don't get the gasoline revenue.<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, <a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&amp;rec_id=19452" rel="nofollow">H2 energy fan 'til ~1996<br>
</br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How LONG, you say?<p>We can only wonder how long it will be before car companies and governments accept that hydrogen is a pipe dream &nbsp;...<p>
I believe it's about minus-seven years for the latter. The car companies just go along with the charade. They don't get the gasoline revenue.<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, <a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&amp;rec_id=19452" rel="nofollow">H2 energy fan 'til ~1996<br>
</br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:15:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A wind-to-hydrogen &quot;mini grid&quot;<p>Meanwhile...<p>
<a href="http://newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&amp;listcatid=32&amp;listitemid=1591&amp;section" rel="nofollow">http://newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&a ...=<p>
The new Environmental Energy Technology Centre (EETC) between Rotherham and Sheffield should see all its power provided by a 225kW turbine.<p>
And, even when the wind does not blow, the turbine should be able to provide the building's power needs through a hydrogen fuel cell system.<p>
The system will generate hydrogen from excess power from the wind turbine through an electrolyser, which can then turned back into electricity by the fuel cell during periods of low wind speed.<br>
</br></p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A wind-to-hydrogen &quot;mini grid&quot;<p>Meanwhile...<p>
<a href="http://newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&amp;listcatid=32&amp;listitemid=1591&amp;section" rel="nofollow">http://newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&a ...=<p>
The new Environmental Energy Technology Centre (EETC) between Rotherham and Sheffield should see all its power provided by a 225kW turbine.<p>
And, even when the wind does not blow, the turbine should be able to provide the building's power needs through a hydrogen fuel cell system.<p>
The system will generate hydrogen from excess power from the wind turbine through an electrolyser, which can then turned back into electricity by the fuel cell during periods of low wind speed.<br>
</br></p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:20:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Roll On, Hydrogen, Roll On!<p>If Woody Guthrie were alive today, he'd be roaming the country, warbling about the glories of hydrogen....<p>
<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/hydrogenics-supply-electrolyzer-powertech-labs/story.aspx?guid=%7B63618086-C43A-4BAA-9479-8971A4C5A1A9%7D&amp;dist=hppr" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/hydrogenics-supply- ...<p>
Hydrogenics, a leading designer and manufacturer of hydrogen electrolyzers and fuel cell systems, has been selected by Powertech Labs, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BC Hydro, to provide an electrolyzer for a community hydro-hydrogen-diesel system serving the community of Bella Coola, British Columbia. <p>
...<p>
"Hydrogen provides an ideal energy storage solution," said Daryl Wilson, President and CEO of Hydrogenics. "We believe that hydrogen will play a critical role in capturing the power of renewable resources and creating viable energy systems that are cost effective, sustainable and environmentally friendly," says Wilson. Batteries are often used to store excess energy; however, batteries incur significant energy loss over time and are relatively expensive options for large scale energy storage. By comparison, stored hydrogen does not dissipate energy over time and the cost of storage is relatively low. "Hydrogen storage is highly scalable and ideal for storing large amounts of energy for long periods of time," Wilson added. This is particularly significant at Bella Coola where the intermittency of the run-of-the-river system will require long-term storage, where hydrogen significantly outperforms batteries. In addition, hydrogen is multi-use and can be used to fuel vehicles and other industrial equipment.</p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Roll On, Hydrogen, Roll On!<p>If Woody Guthrie were alive today, he'd be roaming the country, warbling about the glories of hydrogen....<p>
<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/hydrogenics-supply-electrolyzer-powertech-labs/story.aspx?guid=%7B63618086-C43A-4BAA-9479-8971A4C5A1A9%7D&amp;dist=hppr" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/hydrogenics-supply- ...<p>
Hydrogenics, a leading designer and manufacturer of hydrogen electrolyzers and fuel cell systems, has been selected by Powertech Labs, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BC Hydro, to provide an electrolyzer for a community hydro-hydrogen-diesel system serving the community of Bella Coola, British Columbia. <p>
...<p>
"Hydrogen provides an ideal energy storage solution," said Daryl Wilson, President and CEO of Hydrogenics. "We believe that hydrogen will play a critical role in capturing the power of renewable resources and creating viable energy systems that are cost effective, sustainable and environmentally friendly," says Wilson. Batteries are often used to store excess energy; however, batteries incur significant energy loss over time and are relatively expensive options for large scale energy storage. By comparison, stored hydrogen does not dissipate energy over time and the cost of storage is relatively low. "Hydrogen storage is highly scalable and ideal for storing large amounts of energy for long periods of time," Wilson added. This is particularly significant at Bella Coola where the intermittency of the run-of-the-river system will require long-term storage, where hydrogen significantly outperforms batteries. In addition, hydrogen is multi-use and can be used to fuel vehicles and other industrial equipment.</p></p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #15 by patrickS</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:00:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Put all your eggs in one basket?</strong></p><p>Bob Wallace has the right idea here. &nbsp;There are several alternatives which will be ready at different times. &nbsp;Without research as a part of technology development, we'll never be able to take advantage of the benefits from any of them. &nbsp;</p><p>
To meet our energy needs, we'll need a portfolio of options and hydrogen technologies are going to be PART of that portfolio. &nbsp;So that means hydrogen technologies WITH, not instead of, renewables, plug-in technology, some batteries, hybridization and others so that we can use the advantages of each technology. &nbsp;Looking for a silver bullet, if you believe in that sort of thing, will limit us all.</p><p>
And research dollars are going to continue to be needed to make these technologies ready for commercialization. &nbsp;So let's put some effort into making some progress (like the fact that the cost of a fuel cell for a vehicles has come down from $300/kW to $90/kW in just the last 4 years due in part to DOE money), instead of trying to cut technologies out of the picture. &nbsp;</p><p>
I spend a lot of my time working with the National Hydrogen Association and I'll be the first to say that we're going to need a group of technologies (not JUST hydrogen) if we really want to have a meaningful impact on A) reducing fuel imports, B) improving the environment and C) growing the economy. &nbsp;And as we work to get there, hydrogen will be an important part of the solution.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Put all your eggs in one basket?</strong></p><p>Bob Wallace has the right idea here. &nbsp;There are several alternatives which will be ready at different times. &nbsp;Without research as a part of technology development, we'll never be able to take advantage of the benefits from any of them. &nbsp;</p><p>
To meet our energy needs, we'll need a portfolio of options and hydrogen technologies are going to be PART of that portfolio. &nbsp;So that means hydrogen technologies WITH, not instead of, renewables, plug-in technology, some batteries, hybridization and others so that we can use the advantages of each technology. &nbsp;Looking for a silver bullet, if you believe in that sort of thing, will limit us all.</p><p>
And research dollars are going to continue to be needed to make these technologies ready for commercialization. &nbsp;So let's put some effort into making some progress (like the fact that the cost of a fuel cell for a vehicles has come down from $300/kW to $90/kW in just the last 4 years due in part to DOE money), instead of trying to cut technologies out of the picture. &nbsp;</p><p>
I spend a lot of my time working with the National Hydrogen Association and I'll be the first to say that we're going to need a group of technologies (not JUST hydrogen) if we really want to have a meaningful impact on A) reducing fuel imports, B) improving the environment and C) growing the economy. &nbsp;And as we work to get there, hydrogen will be an important part of the solution.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #16 by jgangi</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:07:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/16</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rebuttal to Romm<p>Bob Rose (executive director of the U.S. Fuel Cell Council) has written a great rebuttal to Romm's piece - check it out at <a href="http://www.fuelcellinsider.org" rel="nofollow">www.fuelcellinsider.org.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Rebuttal to Romm<p>Bob Rose (executive director of the U.S. Fuel Cell Council) has written a great rebuttal to Romm's piece - check it out at <a href="http://www.fuelcellinsider.org" rel="nofollow">www.fuelcellinsider.org.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #17 by H2andYou</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:43:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/17</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let's Remember H2 tech is in use today<p>It is a shame that many people continue to have such pessimistic and ill-informed point of view about hydrogen. &nbsp;The truth is that hydrogen will be a critical part of our nation's sustainable and clean energy future. &nbsp;In fact, even though hydrogen doesn't get the attention it deserves today, people should know that many hydrogen technologies are already available and used widely today. &nbsp;<p>
Although many focus on the automotive industry's progress developing hydrogen technologies, that's just the tip of the iceberg. &nbsp;Consider: &nbsp;both Motorola and Samsung are developing hydrogen-powered cellular phones to be released in 2010. &nbsp; And, the cellular phone industry has already deployed approximately 200 hydrogen back-up power units, which are tied to cell phone towers in the event of a power outage. &nbsp;That means the next cell phone call you make could be powered by hydrogen. &nbsp; <p>
In addition, today's businesses &nbsp;are starting to add hydrogen injection systems on their trucks, bypassing the need for a fueling infrastructure all together, thereby lowering operational fuel costs. &nbsp; And, quite logically, this is making the products we purchase more environmentally-friendly. &nbsp;And, let's not forget that fuel cell forklifts are currently being used by companies such as Wal-Mart and Bridgestone/Firestone to transport goods in warehouses. &nbsp;It was a commitment to research and investment that made each of these technologies possible. <p>
Over the last several decades, we have witnessed different kinds of technologies evolve and impact our lives in ways we couldn't have completely imagined. &nbsp;Everything from cell phones to computers to televisions have evolved and improved in speed, reception, size and their range of capabilities. &nbsp;These advancements in technology became possible through research. &nbsp;The same is true for hydrogen technologies today. &nbsp;Researchers will continue to explore, improve and diversify how hydrogen can impact our lives. <p>
Here are few stories that highlight some of the recent progress that has been made throughout the hydrogen industry: <br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.h ...<br>
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell-hybrid-vehicle-hydrogen.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell- ... <br>
<a href="http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422<p>
As a representative of the National Hydrogen Association, I am helping people understand that hydrogen is a universal fuel that can be used to store energy and power everything from cars, to laptops, to heating systems for your car. &nbsp;It can be produced from any resource, including many that produce no emissions whatsoever other than water, including solar, wind, and nuclear. &nbsp;<br>
</br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Let's Remember H2 tech is in use today<p>It is a shame that many people continue to have such pessimistic and ill-informed point of view about hydrogen. &nbsp;The truth is that hydrogen will be a critical part of our nation's sustainable and clean energy future. &nbsp;In fact, even though hydrogen doesn't get the attention it deserves today, people should know that many hydrogen technologies are already available and used widely today. &nbsp;<p>
Although many focus on the automotive industry's progress developing hydrogen technologies, that's just the tip of the iceberg. &nbsp;Consider: &nbsp;both Motorola and Samsung are developing hydrogen-powered cellular phones to be released in 2010. &nbsp; And, the cellular phone industry has already deployed approximately 200 hydrogen back-up power units, which are tied to cell phone towers in the event of a power outage. &nbsp;That means the next cell phone call you make could be powered by hydrogen. &nbsp; <p>
In addition, today's businesses &nbsp;are starting to add hydrogen injection systems on their trucks, bypassing the need for a fueling infrastructure all together, thereby lowering operational fuel costs. &nbsp; And, quite logically, this is making the products we purchase more environmentally-friendly. &nbsp;And, let's not forget that fuel cell forklifts are currently being used by companies such as Wal-Mart and Bridgestone/Firestone to transport goods in warehouses. &nbsp;It was a commitment to research and investment that made each of these technologies possible. <p>
Over the last several decades, we have witnessed different kinds of technologies evolve and impact our lives in ways we couldn't have completely imagined. &nbsp;Everything from cell phones to computers to televisions have evolved and improved in speed, reception, size and their range of capabilities. &nbsp;These advancements in technology became possible through research. &nbsp;The same is true for hydrogen technologies today. &nbsp;Researchers will continue to explore, improve and diversify how hydrogen can impact our lives. <p>
Here are few stories that highlight some of the recent progress that has been made throughout the hydrogen industry: <br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/06/3m-fuel-cell-me.h ...<br>
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell-hybrid-vehicle-hydrogen.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/toyota-fuel-cell- ... <br>
<a href="http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartpower.org/blog/?p=422<p>
As a representative of the National Hydrogen Association, I am helping people understand that hydrogen is a universal fuel that can be used to store energy and power everything from cars, to laptops, to heating systems for your car. &nbsp;It can be produced from any resource, including many that produce no emissions whatsoever other than water, including solar, wind, and nuclear. &nbsp;<br>
</br></p></a></br></a></br></a></br></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #18 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:52:37 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/flush4/18</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>H2andYou person,<p>I love it. In addition to the biofuel, nuclear, and clean coal enthusiasts begging from the public larder we got the hydrogen enthusiasts.<p>
Let me guess. Part of your job description is to surf the net looking for opportunities to plug hydrogen? I have a friend who has a job like that, except he plugs a different product.<p>
We are not Luddites here, or at least most of us.<p>
Of course hydrogen has many uses and always will. The criticism has been about the over hyping of hydrogen. Government funded research is good stuff but occasionally lobbyists, from whatever industries, manage to convince politicians to move from funding research to throwing tax payer money into the pockets of players, like the hydrogen or biofuels industry, to move beyond the lab, building full scale refineries, or hydrogen fueling stations when doing so isn't justified by the technology or market.<p>
Tanks of gaseous hydrogen sitting ready to fire up a fuel cell at remote cell towers in the event of a power outage sound like a good application, and best of all, no government subsidization needed.<p>
One can see how this concept might be expanded as a giant battery to assist wind and solar.<p>
Fork lifts are often electric to avoid putting fumes into work spaces. Cost issues aside, one can see how fuel cells might be feasible inside a warehouse where you can swap out your gas tank as often as needed through the day. Again, if it makes sense, a company will use them, no government subsidy needed.<p>
But the hydrogen industry just wants to make big bucks, any way they can, like most other industries and if they can enhance those profits by convincing the government to hand them money, they will do so. That's one problem. <p>
Powering cars would be a real cash cow. How all that hydrogen would be produced, liquefied, moved and stored is the other problem, for taxpayers, a godsend to the hydrogen industry.<p>
You can't escape the laws of physics. Hydrogen, even liquid hydrogen, takes up a lot of space. That car you mentioned has a storage tank four times bigger than a gas car. The tanks are also ultra high pressure and expensive, as opposed to a simple welded steel tank.<p>
In addition, today's businesses &nbsp;are starting to add hydrogen injection systems on their trucks, bypassing the need for a fueling infrastructure all together, thereby lowering operational fuel costs. And, quite logically, this is making the products we purchase more environmentally-friendly.<p>
You might want to drop the above from your spiel. Hydrogen injection systems are a scam.<p>
<a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/08/04/why-on-board-hydrogen-generators-wont-boost-your-mileage" rel="nofollow">http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/08/04/why-on-board-hydr ...<p>
&nbsp; 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>H2andYou person,<p>I love it. In addition to the biofuel, nuclear, and clean coal enthusiasts begging from the public larder we got the hydrogen enthusiasts.<p>
Let me guess. Part of your job description is to surf the net looking for opportunities to plug hydrogen? I have a friend who has a job like that, except he plugs a different product.<p>
We are not Luddites here, or at least most of us.<p>
Of course hydrogen has many uses and always will. The criticism has been about the over hyping of hydrogen. Government funded research is good stuff but occasionally lobbyists, from whatever industries, manage to convince politicians to move from funding research to throwing tax payer money into the pockets of players, like the hydrogen or biofuels industry, to move beyond the lab, building full scale refineries, or hydrogen fueling stations when doing so isn't justified by the technology or market.<p>
Tanks of gaseous hydrogen sitting ready to fire up a fuel cell at remote cell towers in the event of a power outage sound like a good application, and best of all, no government subsidization needed.<p>
One can see how this concept might be expanded as a giant battery to assist wind and solar.<p>
Fork lifts are often electric to avoid putting fumes into work spaces. Cost issues aside, one can see how fuel cells might be feasible inside a warehouse where you can swap out your gas tank as often as needed through the day. Again, if it makes sense, a company will use them, no government subsidy needed.<p>
But the hydrogen industry just wants to make big bucks, any way they can, like most other industries and if they can enhance those profits by convincing the government to hand them money, they will do so. That's one problem. <p>
Powering cars would be a real cash cow. How all that hydrogen would be produced, liquefied, moved and stored is the other problem, for taxpayers, a godsend to the hydrogen industry.<p>
You can't escape the laws of physics. Hydrogen, even liquid hydrogen, takes up a lot of space. That car you mentioned has a storage tank four times bigger than a gas car. The tanks are also ultra high pressure and expensive, as opposed to a simple welded steel tank.<p>
In addition, today's businesses &nbsp;are starting to add hydrogen injection systems on their trucks, bypassing the need for a fueling infrastructure all together, thereby lowering operational fuel costs. And, quite logically, this is making the products we purchase more environmentally-friendly.<p>
You might want to drop the above from your spiel. Hydrogen injection systems are a scam.<p>
<a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/08/04/why-on-board-hydrogen-generators-wont-boost-your-mileage" rel="nofollow">http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/08/04/why-on-board-hydr ...<p>
&nbsp; 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>