<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Bipartisan plan aims to revamp U.S. fisheries law]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by lanawuzhear</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:23:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Quotas</strong></p><p>It seems to me that if we follow the example set by countries such as New Zealand and set up a marketable quota system we would eliminate a lot of the concerns from opposers of the quota system. In this system, quotas are tradeable based on values determined by a market. This way, there is a chance for growth for small-scale fisheries and the price is determined by the demand. Quotas are assessed on a monthly basis and new &nbsp;fisheries can enter the market as well. They also use a royalty system of a few percent of the total value of the quota (I can't recall the exact amount), which would be a source of funding for the act and any enforcement required. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Quotas</strong></p><p>It seems to me that if we follow the example set by countries such as New Zealand and set up a marketable quota system we would eliminate a lot of the concerns from opposers of the quota system. In this system, quotas are tradeable based on values determined by a market. This way, there is a chance for growth for small-scale fisheries and the price is determined by the demand. Quotas are assessed on a monthly basis and new &nbsp;fisheries can enter the market as well. They also use a royalty system of a few percent of the total value of the quota (I can't recall the exact amount), which would be a source of funding for the act and any enforcement required. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by pianoyoga</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:20:20 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>protecting fisheries</strong></p><p>It can be difficult developing an attitude about fisheries protection. &nbsp;Try reading Cod: the Fish that Changed the World (available on Amazon.)</p><p>
personally, I think we need to create more marine reserves (like the Icelanders did- &nbsp;notice how much of your store cod is Icelandic?). &nbsp;One of the best potential ways to do this would be to directly occupy endangered areas with wind-turbine farms. &nbsp; I'd stick a trial project right out in the Georges Bank, let the towers snag driftlines and thwart trawlers, while placing permanent human observers out in the field. &nbsp;Mooring structures create habitat. &nbsp;Hydrogen production could fuel boats. &nbsp;Could have packing and refrigeration facilities too. &nbsp;Perhaps such an efficient and profitable operation that it could economically regulate exploitation of the resource.</p><p>
This is a permaculture idea applied to fisheries- always manage for multiple yields.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>protecting fisheries</strong></p><p>It can be difficult developing an attitude about fisheries protection. &nbsp;Try reading Cod: the Fish that Changed the World (available on Amazon.)</p><p>
personally, I think we need to create more marine reserves (like the Icelanders did- &nbsp;notice how much of your store cod is Icelandic?). &nbsp;One of the best potential ways to do this would be to directly occupy endangered areas with wind-turbine farms. &nbsp; I'd stick a trial project right out in the Georges Bank, let the towers snag driftlines and thwart trawlers, while placing permanent human observers out in the field. &nbsp;Mooring structures create habitat. &nbsp;Hydrogen production could fuel boats. &nbsp;Could have packing and refrigeration facilities too. &nbsp;Perhaps such an efficient and profitable operation that it could economically regulate exploitation of the resource.</p><p>
This is a permaculture idea applied to fisheries- always manage for multiple yields.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/fisheries1/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great feature of offshore wind!</strong></p><p>It is an excellent side benefit, offshore floating wind, wave, and ocean current power stations would make the huge pond nets that are destroying fisheries impossible to use.</p><p>
Something diplomacy and international law hasn't been able to do. &nbsp;Protect the national fishery with renewable energy.</p><p>
Will it encourage new, hi-tech smarter fishing techniques that only harvest the targeted species and save the marine environment from the current devestation? &nbsp;I think it could.</p><p>
Fishermen using underwater cameras to operate gates in their equipment that would preselect the catch. &nbsp;The collateral damage of commercial fishing in it's present state is awful.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Great feature of offshore wind!</strong></p><p>It is an excellent side benefit, offshore floating wind, wave, and ocean current power stations would make the huge pond nets that are destroying fisheries impossible to use.</p><p>
Something diplomacy and international law hasn't been able to do. &nbsp;Protect the national fishery with renewable energy.</p><p>
Will it encourage new, hi-tech smarter fishing techniques that only harvest the targeted species and save the marine environment from the current devestation? &nbsp;I think it could.</p><p>
Fishermen using underwater cameras to operate gates in their equipment that would preselect the catch. &nbsp;The collateral damage of commercial fishing in it's present state is awful.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>