<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for California mulls nation&#8217;s first feebate bill]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/feebate-watch/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:45:05 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/feebate-watch/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Feebate&quot; doesn't describe it well</strong></p><p>It's great for policy-head slang, however I find it's something that needs to be explained before you can understand what it means.</p><p>
Essentially it's a "Robin-Hood Principle" for Car Purchase Costs.</p><p>
Raise the cost of gas guzzlers, to pay for lowering the cost of gas sippers.</p><p>
It has both a push and a pull effect towards shifting people to greener cars.</p><p>
AND research has shown that changing the cost of the car, rather than changing the cost of the fuel has a far more profound effect on changing consumer's buying habits.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Feebate&quot; doesn't describe it well</strong></p><p>It's great for policy-head slang, however I find it's something that needs to be explained before you can understand what it means.</p><p>
Essentially it's a "Robin-Hood Principle" for Car Purchase Costs.</p><p>
Raise the cost of gas guzzlers, to pay for lowering the cost of gas sippers.</p><p>
It has both a push and a pull effect towards shifting people to greener cars.</p><p>
AND research has shown that changing the cost of the car, rather than changing the cost of the fuel has a far more profound effect on changing consumer's buying habits.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by odograph</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/feebate-watch/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:05:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/feebate-watch/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>feebates</strong></p><p>I don't think feebates are perfect, but they are probably more effective than (more easily gamed) CAFE-style regimes.</p><p>
A world-wide carbon tax would be better, but I don't see that on the '08 or near-term radar.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>feebates</strong></p><p>I don't think feebates are perfect, but they are probably more effective than (more easily gamed) CAFE-style regimes.</p><p>
A world-wide carbon tax would be better, but I don't see that on the '08 or near-term radar.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>