<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Timothy LaSalle of Rodale on the surprising climate benefits of organic farming]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Quinn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/farm-team/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:38:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/farm-team/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Minor Correction</strong></p><p>It's Kutztown, not Kurtztown.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Minor Correction</strong></p><p>It's Kutztown, not Kurtztown.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Philip Small</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/farm-team/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:57:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/farm-team/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Soil Scientist Responds</strong></p><p>The conventional soil scientist must have gone out &nbsp;with the 60's. I haven't met a "conventional" soil scientist, one that meets the definition used above, ever. Soil scientists long ago had to come to terms with the fact that all nutrient cycles are mediated by soil biology. I was taught in the early 70s in University that understanding the soil resource as a living entity is what separated our profession from engineers and geologists. I don't think even that distinction is still true, or certainly not as true as it was then. &nbsp;Bioengineering, biogeochemistry and such. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Soil Scientist Responds</strong></p><p>The conventional soil scientist must have gone out &nbsp;with the 60's. I haven't met a "conventional" soil scientist, one that meets the definition used above, ever. Soil scientists long ago had to come to terms with the fact that all nutrient cycles are mediated by soil biology. I was taught in the early 70s in University that understanding the soil resource as a living entity is what separated our profession from engineers and geologists. I don't think even that distinction is still true, or certainly not as true as it was then. &nbsp;Bioengineering, biogeochemistry and such. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>