<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Small is beautiful.]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>[new]</strong></p><p>Australia is a curious place. &nbsp;The cities are well defined. &nbsp;Stand at the edge of Melbourne and on one side of the road are houses tightly packed together, on the other side Eucalyptus trees and bush as far as the eye can see, and that is very far indeed. &nbsp;It is so flat there.</p><p>
There is absolutely no reason to have cars in Australian cities. &nbsp;In the bush one must stop and fill up at every gas station. &nbsp;Many carry extra engines because if something goes wrong the car will be abandoned in the outback. There are many lost and rusting cars out in the middle of nowhere. &nbsp; Not a good location for hydrogen cars.</p><p>
Lots of sun in Seattle today, I've collected 20 kW passive solar energy all afternoon, its now a balmy 74 F. in here and the warm concrete will keep us comfy for a couple days. &nbsp;I don't have much use for Hydrogen toys.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>[new]</strong></p><p>Australia is a curious place. &nbsp;The cities are well defined. &nbsp;Stand at the edge of Melbourne and on one side of the road are houses tightly packed together, on the other side Eucalyptus trees and bush as far as the eye can see, and that is very far indeed. &nbsp;It is so flat there.</p><p>
There is absolutely no reason to have cars in Australian cities. &nbsp;In the bush one must stop and fill up at every gas station. &nbsp;Many carry extra engines because if something goes wrong the car will be abandoned in the outback. There are many lost and rusting cars out in the middle of nowhere. &nbsp; Not a good location for hydrogen cars.</p><p>
Lots of sun in Seattle today, I've collected 20 kW passive solar energy all afternoon, its now a balmy 74 F. in here and the warm concrete will keep us comfy for a couple days. &nbsp;I don't have much use for Hydrogen toys.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:46:17 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower<p>Would you mind describing in great detail your system for everybody (including your backup systems and square footage numbers)? I think I have deduced what it is, I just don't have the details.<p>
Sunflower's system is ideal for Seattle. Not so in Tucson where you need cooling. If a reasonably priced system for converting summer solar power into hydrogen existed, sunflower could heat on those many cloudy winter days with it instead of burning wood. Both methods have a fairly low carbon impact, but hydrogen would burn a lot cleaner and wouldn't require the collection and distribution of wood stove fuel. But for now, since hydrogen is basically a pipe dream, his system is much more cost effective for this part of the country. Wood stoves in Seattle are OK as long as they are few and far between. Smoke bans also tend to coincide with our coldest and sunniest days.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower<p>Would you mind describing in great detail your system for everybody (including your backup systems and square footage numbers)? I think I have deduced what it is, I just don't have the details.<p>
Sunflower's system is ideal for Seattle. Not so in Tucson where you need cooling. If a reasonably priced system for converting summer solar power into hydrogen existed, sunflower could heat on those many cloudy winter days with it instead of burning wood. Both methods have a fairly low carbon impact, but hydrogen would burn a lot cleaner and wouldn't require the collection and distribution of wood stove fuel. But for now, since hydrogen is basically a pipe dream, his system is much more cost effective for this part of the country. Wood stoves in Seattle are OK as long as they are few and far between. Smoke bans also tend to coincide with our coldest and sunniest days.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GRLCowan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydridiocy<p>Passing hydrogen through a fuel cell to power an electric car or light a home would also be a lot more efficient.<p>
It's only automotive fuel cells in general that are more than 30 percent efficient, chemical-to-DC; there's no particular one that is. Lower-specific-power air-breathing fuel cells have been known to hit 40 percent at beginning of life, and would indeed then, if hooked up to efficient lamps, be an efficient way of using hydrogen for illumination. But deep-cycle lead-acid batteries are much better for using sunlight of hours earlier for that.<p>
--- G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen fan<br>
<a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html" rel="nofollow">Oxygen expands around B fire, car goes</a></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hydridiocy<p>Passing hydrogen through a fuel cell to power an electric car or light a home would also be a lot more efficient.<p>
It's only automotive fuel cells in general that are more than 30 percent efficient, chemical-to-DC; there's no particular one that is. Lower-specific-power air-breathing fuel cells have been known to hit 40 percent at beginning of life, and would indeed then, if hooked up to efficient lamps, be an efficient way of using hydrogen for illumination. But deep-cycle lead-acid batteries are much better for using sunlight of hours earlier for that.<p>
--- G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen fan<br>
<a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html" rel="nofollow">Oxygen expands around B fire, car goes</a></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:05:05 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good points, GRLCowan<p>The beauty of feedback. My main point was that using the power directly to power the fan and water pump in a swamp cooler would be very efficient compared to making and then burning hydrogen in a car.<p>
That one sentence was thrown out without much thought. You are right, a 30% efficient fuel cell driving an electric motor would be just as inefficient if not more so than burning the hydrogen in the ICE. And lead acids would be much better to store the previous day's surplus to use at night for lighting. I was thinking more about long term storage. You could fill a couple of tanks with hydrogen to use in cold months with little sunshine to heat with (95% efficient furnace) but you couldn't do that with lead-acids. They need to be used soon after they are charged. So, I guess hydrogen makes even less sense in Australia. It would have better application in Seattle, should it ever move beyond pipe dream status.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good points, GRLCowan<p>The beauty of feedback. My main point was that using the power directly to power the fan and water pump in a swamp cooler would be very efficient compared to making and then burning hydrogen in a car.<p>
That one sentence was thrown out without much thought. You are right, a 30% efficient fuel cell driving an electric motor would be just as inefficient if not more so than burning the hydrogen in the ICE. And lead acids would be much better to store the previous day's surplus to use at night for lighting. I was thinking more about long term storage. You could fill a couple of tanks with hydrogen to use in cold months with little sunshine to heat with (95% efficient furnace) but you couldn't do that with lead-acids. They need to be used soon after they are charged. So, I guess hydrogen makes even less sense in Australia. It would have better application in Seattle, should it ever move beyond pipe dream status.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Nucbuddy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:16:57 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Creating cancer alleys for misery and loss</strong></p><p><b>Biodiversivist</b> wrote:<br>
&lt;bockquote&gt;Wood stoves in Seattle are OK as long as they are few and far between.</p><p>
...As long as one does not mind creating few-and-far-between cancer alleys.<br>
</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Creating cancer alleys for misery and loss</strong></p><p><b>Biodiversivist</b> wrote:<br>
&lt;bockquote&gt;Wood stoves in Seattle are OK as long as they are few and far between.</p><p>
...As long as one does not mind creating few-and-far-between cancer alleys.<br>
</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:51:22 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower passive solar home data</strong></p><p>Its full of dogs, full of dirt and grit. &nbsp;Did I say dirty? &nbsp;Upstairs is clean and we call it the museum, full of antiques. &nbsp;The attic is wood, green, with a guest bed. &nbsp;It looks like a farm house.</p><p>
My inspiration for the green building experiment came from my visit to the Lovins home. &nbsp;</p><p>
Every building location has unique energy opportunities and limitations. &nbsp;The Snowmass, CO. high altitude Lovins site is a south slope with lots of winter sun. &nbsp;Our Fox Island, WA. site is a north slope in a tall fir forest. &nbsp;We get zero sun within 30 days of the winter solstice and only partial sun through the trees the rest of the year. &nbsp;If we could make passive solar work here then such an approach would have wide applications elsewhere. &nbsp;The rule I followed was that each energy subsystem, if new, must be cost effective or not employed. &nbsp;That meant no photovoltaic cells.</p><p>
The components are simple off-the-shelf building materials and construction techniques -- 8 inch reinforced concrete walls, concrete floors, exterior polystyrene insulation, siding, windows with shutters, air to air heat exchanger, wood roof, SunFrost refrigerator, front loader washer, clothesline, plus electric heat (1.8 kW) and electric hot water for accurate energy input measurements. &nbsp;</p><p>
Because the load supporting concrete walls were designed to be inside and dry (concrete thermal mass), the expected lifetime of the building was in excess of 500 years, I think much more, so our esteemed commercial engineers made it resistant to our big bi-millennium NW earthquake, lots of grade 60 rebar and concrete testing. </p><p>
Our planned application was lab and shop ground floor, office and living upstairs, storage and guests in attic. &nbsp;The long-term plan is school or cave for future humans. &nbsp;We made no interior small rooms (except the bathroom under the stairs), so each floor is one big room. &nbsp;The foot print is 27 by 45 feet plus a 10 foot wide sun room on the ground floor. &nbsp;Only the sun room roof is above ground (45 by 8 foot covered skylight, 20 kW net solar input) because the house is bermed into the north slope. &nbsp;Our hot water is preheated from plastic pipes buried in the sun room concrete floor.</p><p>
My construction budget was $40,000 (1994 USD) for everything. &nbsp;I got lucky at Boeing Surplus. &nbsp;All the foam insulation, siding, wood, electrical, plumbing, and roof came from recycled components. &nbsp;I did all the work. </p><p>
Here are the numbers in average kilowatts hours per day total energy input.<br>
With sun 12 kWh<br>
Without sun &nbsp;50 kWh &nbsp;(Dec.-Feb.)<br>
Two or three hours of winter sun will heat one winter day.</p><p>
After eight years, and a cold wet November, we had had enough data and bought a low-emission wood stove. &nbsp;We never use electric heat anymore.<br>
Now every month is a flat 12 kWh per day average. &nbsp;(The electric hot water is the next target.)</p><p>
We have had some 100 F days and extended heatwaves, especially last summer, but our insulated thermal mass keeps the home at 73 F all year, day and night, nice and steady. &nbsp;It is amazing so little energy can feel so comfortable.<br>
</br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower passive solar home data</strong></p><p>Its full of dogs, full of dirt and grit. &nbsp;Did I say dirty? &nbsp;Upstairs is clean and we call it the museum, full of antiques. &nbsp;The attic is wood, green, with a guest bed. &nbsp;It looks like a farm house.</p><p>
My inspiration for the green building experiment came from my visit to the Lovins home. &nbsp;</p><p>
Every building location has unique energy opportunities and limitations. &nbsp;The Snowmass, CO. high altitude Lovins site is a south slope with lots of winter sun. &nbsp;Our Fox Island, WA. site is a north slope in a tall fir forest. &nbsp;We get zero sun within 30 days of the winter solstice and only partial sun through the trees the rest of the year. &nbsp;If we could make passive solar work here then such an approach would have wide applications elsewhere. &nbsp;The rule I followed was that each energy subsystem, if new, must be cost effective or not employed. &nbsp;That meant no photovoltaic cells.</p><p>
The components are simple off-the-shelf building materials and construction techniques -- 8 inch reinforced concrete walls, concrete floors, exterior polystyrene insulation, siding, windows with shutters, air to air heat exchanger, wood roof, SunFrost refrigerator, front loader washer, clothesline, plus electric heat (1.8 kW) and electric hot water for accurate energy input measurements. &nbsp;</p><p>
Because the load supporting concrete walls were designed to be inside and dry (concrete thermal mass), the expected lifetime of the building was in excess of 500 years, I think much more, so our esteemed commercial engineers made it resistant to our big bi-millennium NW earthquake, lots of grade 60 rebar and concrete testing. </p><p>
Our planned application was lab and shop ground floor, office and living upstairs, storage and guests in attic. &nbsp;The long-term plan is school or cave for future humans. &nbsp;We made no interior small rooms (except the bathroom under the stairs), so each floor is one big room. &nbsp;The foot print is 27 by 45 feet plus a 10 foot wide sun room on the ground floor. &nbsp;Only the sun room roof is above ground (45 by 8 foot covered skylight, 20 kW net solar input) because the house is bermed into the north slope. &nbsp;Our hot water is preheated from plastic pipes buried in the sun room concrete floor.</p><p>
My construction budget was $40,000 (1994 USD) for everything. &nbsp;I got lucky at Boeing Surplus. &nbsp;All the foam insulation, siding, wood, electrical, plumbing, and roof came from recycled components. &nbsp;I did all the work. </p><p>
Here are the numbers in average kilowatts hours per day total energy input.<br>
With sun 12 kWh<br>
Without sun &nbsp;50 kWh &nbsp;(Dec.-Feb.)<br>
Two or three hours of winter sun will heat one winter day.</p><p>
After eight years, and a cold wet November, we had had enough data and bought a low-emission wood stove. &nbsp;We never use electric heat anymore.<br>
Now every month is a flat 12 kWh per day average. &nbsp;(The electric hot water is the next target.)</p><p>
We have had some 100 F days and extended heatwaves, especially last summer, but our insulated thermal mass keeps the home at 73 F all year, day and night, nice and steady. &nbsp;It is amazing so little energy can feel so comfortable.<br>
</br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Palaces</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>FREEDOM DAY in July, 2039 -- FREEDOM from Carbon<p>Based on three assumptions, the Carbon Energy Economy is over in 41 years:<p>
(1) Today 1700 MW PV<br>
(2) Doubling installed reduces the price 19%<br>
(3) Growth rate 25%/yr - 3 yrs to double<p>
The date that the entire consumption of electricity from PV occurs can be projected to exact month in the future.<p>
Download spreadsheet<br>
<a href="http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls" rel="nofollow">http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls<p>
Tex...<p>
Thirty-two years and six months, July 2039, 1,851,556,663 kW PV, cost will then be $1.01/watt<p>
A double capacity is figured, which is accomplished in thirty-five years, and the cost will be 85 cents per watt.<p>
Hydrogen Economy fourfold increase in PV, accomplished in 41 years, in 2058, cost of PV 60 cents per watt installed.<p>
Three years later the production will have increased to double all the energy of every form currently used, costs will be 50 cents.<br>


<p>http:ecosyn.us PALACES for the People, H2-PV, PV-Breeders acres of PV, tons of Hydrogen</p></br></p></p></p></p></p></a></br></p></p></br></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>FREEDOM DAY in July, 2039 -- FREEDOM from Carbon<p>Based on three assumptions, the Carbon Energy Economy is over in 41 years:<p>
(1) Today 1700 MW PV<br>
(2) Doubling installed reduces the price 19%<br>
(3) Growth rate 25%/yr - 3 yrs to double<p>
The date that the entire consumption of electricity from PV occurs can be projected to exact month in the future.<p>
Download spreadsheet<br>
<a href="http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls" rel="nofollow">http://www.hydrogenfreedom.info/scenario_1.xls<p>
Tex...<p>
Thirty-two years and six months, July 2039, 1,851,556,663 kW PV, cost will then be $1.01/watt<p>
A double capacity is figured, which is accomplished in thirty-five years, and the cost will be 85 cents per watt.<p>
Hydrogen Economy fourfold increase in PV, accomplished in 41 years, in 2058, cost of PV 60 cents per watt installed.<p>
Three years later the production will have increased to double all the energy of every form currently used, costs will be 50 cents.<br>


<p>http:ecosyn.us PALACES for the People, H2-PV, PV-Breeders acres of PV, tons of Hydrogen</p></br></p></p></p></p></p></a></br></p></p></br></br></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower passive solar skylight<p>Pix of mirrored skylight cover open. &nbsp;Net solar energy is 20 kW.<br>
<a href="http://www.harbornet.com/sunflower/xhouse.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.harbornet.com/sunflower/xhouse.jpg</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sunflower passive solar skylight<p>Pix of mirrored skylight cover open. &nbsp;Net solar energy is 20 kW.<br>
<a href="http://www.harbornet.com/sunflower/xhouse.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.harbornet.com/sunflower/xhouse.jpg</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:57:23 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We consume over three times as much<p>electricity as you, sunflower. Which, I realize has nothing at all to do with solar power for either of us since we use gas and you use wood to supplement solar heat. The difference is obviously a matter of effort (conservation). To put that in perspective, we would have to install $50,000 worth of photovoltaics on our roof to reduce our monthly bill to yours. I suspect we could get close with a little effort, making a game out of it just for fun. <p>
We make no real attempt to conserve it other than to turn off unneeded lights here and there. Typical of most because we have no real incentive to do otherwise. What people need are incentives, preferably, not coercive ones. &nbsp;<p>
Sounds like you grab the sun with two huge sunrooms instead of flat plates. You essentially have a 45 foot long solar collector on your roof that stores heat in your concrete that can warm your house for short periods when the sun isn't shining. How do you keep your house from becoming a solar oven in the summer. Do you simply close off the sun rooms?<p>
The beauty of your passive design is its simplicity and cost effectiveness. Government incentives for solar hot water created a spate of growth a few years back but many of those solar water systems have since failed and have been dismantled. They were too complex, consisting of pipes, antifreeze, valves, storage systems and the like. The return on investment proved not to be worth the effort for many.<p>
I think the key to making solar more common in Seattle is to give people designs that make a statement. Throwing in a few obvious panels to supplement passive would do that. They would be badges of honor and become topics of discussion, raising awareness, creating competition. A mix of a few photovoltaics for show and as a kind of art sculpture, passive to grab winter sun, and a few flat plate air collectors to get warm air into parts of the house that passive can't reach, like the basement. &nbsp;<p>
Obviously, photovoltaics make little sense in this part of the country at present costs. However, flat plate air collectors are simple and cheap. They do a great job heating a home on sunny cold days. Storing heat for night time use is where things get complicated and expensive. Conservation trumps all. 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We consume over three times as much<p>electricity as you, sunflower. Which, I realize has nothing at all to do with solar power for either of us since we use gas and you use wood to supplement solar heat. The difference is obviously a matter of effort (conservation). To put that in perspective, we would have to install $50,000 worth of photovoltaics on our roof to reduce our monthly bill to yours. I suspect we could get close with a little effort, making a game out of it just for fun. <p>
We make no real attempt to conserve it other than to turn off unneeded lights here and there. Typical of most because we have no real incentive to do otherwise. What people need are incentives, preferably, not coercive ones. &nbsp;<p>
Sounds like you grab the sun with two huge sunrooms instead of flat plates. You essentially have a 45 foot long solar collector on your roof that stores heat in your concrete that can warm your house for short periods when the sun isn't shining. How do you keep your house from becoming a solar oven in the summer. Do you simply close off the sun rooms?<p>
The beauty of your passive design is its simplicity and cost effectiveness. Government incentives for solar hot water created a spate of growth a few years back but many of those solar water systems have since failed and have been dismantled. They were too complex, consisting of pipes, antifreeze, valves, storage systems and the like. The return on investment proved not to be worth the effort for many.<p>
I think the key to making solar more common in Seattle is to give people designs that make a statement. Throwing in a few obvious panels to supplement passive would do that. They would be badges of honor and become topics of discussion, raising awareness, creating competition. A mix of a few photovoltaics for show and as a kind of art sculpture, passive to grab winter sun, and a few flat plate air collectors to get warm air into parts of the house that passive can't reach, like the basement. &nbsp;<p>
Obviously, photovoltaics make little sense in this part of the country at present costs. However, flat plate air collectors are simple and cheap. They do a great job heating a home on sunny cold days. Storing heat for night time use is where things get complicated and expensive. Conservation trumps all. 

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:03:50 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Missed the point</strong></p><p><br>
The whole point of using hydrogen is that it gets people away from this whole "rigging it up" in your backyard mentality for solar.</p><p>
Don't you get it? &nbsp; Hydrogen frees the panels from the power target. &nbsp; It's a carrier! &nbsp; Putting the hydrogen generator in your garage is like making Yahoo put its server into your garage so you can "access the web". &nbsp; There's no need!</p><p>
You put the solar panels where the sun is, where it's the most powerful and generates the most energy...then you pipe in the hydrogen to fuel cells at your home.<br>


<p>The Texeme Construct offers international text memetics construction and textcasting services.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Missed the point</strong></p><p><br>
The whole point of using hydrogen is that it gets people away from this whole "rigging it up" in your backyard mentality for solar.</p><p>
Don't you get it? &nbsp; Hydrogen frees the panels from the power target. &nbsp; It's a carrier! &nbsp; Putting the hydrogen generator in your garage is like making Yahoo put its server into your garage so you can "access the web". &nbsp; There's no need!</p><p>
You put the solar panels where the sun is, where it's the most powerful and generates the most energy...then you pipe in the hydrogen to fuel cells at your home.<br>


<p>The Texeme Construct offers international text memetics construction and textcasting services.</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How does that mirrored skylight work?<p>Do you close it at night?

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How does that mirrored skylight work?<p>Do you close it at night?

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:18:53 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Surplus mirrors</strong></p><p>The mirrors reflect low winter sunlight into the basement. &nbsp;We get summer-like overhead sun in the winter. &nbsp;Summer sun in the cold winter is very nice!</p><p>
We close it on winter nights and partially close it on hot summer days.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Surplus mirrors</strong></p><p>The mirrors reflect low winter sunlight into the basement. &nbsp;We get summer-like overhead sun in the winter. &nbsp;Summer sun in the cold winter is very nice!</p><p>
We close it on winter nights and partially close it on hot summer days.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:24:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>jabailo<p>It is all a matter of cost. What would consumers have to pay to pipe solar generated hydrogen over the mountains to Seattle and then throw 70% of its energy away in a 30% efficient fuel cell? Burning it in 95% efficient natural gas furnace would make a lot more sense. But even then, I would bet you would pay an order of magnitude or two more than for natural gas. My heating bill might be ten thousand dollars a year instead of one thousand. The numbers have been run by many. No need to build the system as the engineer did for his home. He already new it would cost half a million dollars.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>jabailo<p>It is all a matter of cost. What would consumers have to pay to pipe solar generated hydrogen over the mountains to Seattle and then throw 70% of its energy away in a 30% efficient fuel cell? Burning it in 95% efficient natural gas furnace would make a lot more sense. But even then, I would bet you would pay an order of magnitude or two more than for natural gas. My heating bill might be ten thousand dollars a year instead of one thousand. The numbers have been run by many. No need to build the system as the engineer did for his home. He already new it would cost half a million dollars.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>bioD --</strong></p><p>We made no effort to conserve power. &nbsp;The possible differences may be hot water. &nbsp;There are only two of us, all the water is preheated in the warm floor so we do not need to add much hot water into the mix, and we wash clothes in cold water. &nbsp;We do not have a clothes dryer, use swirl lights, the refrigerator is efficient, and we do not have a furnace fan.</p><p>
The house service is only a 30 amp line so I built a micro to control discretionary loads - the electric hot water is switched off automatically when the microwave oven and Cassandra's hair dryer demand power.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>bioD --</strong></p><p>We made no effort to conserve power. &nbsp;The possible differences may be hot water. &nbsp;There are only two of us, all the water is preheated in the warm floor so we do not need to add much hot water into the mix, and we wash clothes in cold water. &nbsp;We do not have a clothes dryer, use swirl lights, the refrigerator is efficient, and we do not have a furnace fan.</p><p>
The house service is only a 30 amp line so I built a micro to control discretionary loads - the electric hot water is switched off automatically when the microwave oven and Cassandra's hair dryer demand power.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #15 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good points<p>We use a gas water heater, so that energy cost has been shifted from electric. We do however have a dishwaser, electric dryer and washing machine--conveniences that are going to stay in place for my wife and this family of four.<p>
We also have a 200 amp service.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good points<p>We use a gas water heater, so that energy cost has been shifted from electric. We do however have a dishwaser, electric dryer and washing machine--conveniences that are going to stay in place for my wife and this family of four.<p>
We also have a 200 amp service.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #16 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:15:53 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/extracting-useful-energy-from-a-fusion-reaction/16</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good thread bio-d!</strong></p><p>It gives me another chance to tout my solutions.</p><p>
Water and home heating with direct solar, passive as with sunflower's excellent design, and active as with a trough collectors heating a pumped fluid.</p><p>
And really efficient appliances, like a dryer that uses stored heat instead of electric heat, and releases that heat back into the home.</p><p>
In your case of cloudy, rainy winters a geothermal heat pump to do the rest of the heating. &nbsp;And really long term heat storage built into the home. &nbsp;Heat storage phase change salt in the basement maybe? &nbsp;</p><p>
Solar electric power cogenerated in the same trough collectors. &nbsp;Extra electric power for home use from offshore wind/wave in your region. And from river current power, without hydroelectric dams. Backup power from biogas digestion of waste with the biogas used in solid oxide fuel cell/turbines. &nbsp;</p><p>
Natural gas as the ultimate fossil emergency fuel, hundreds of years worth can be converted from coal deposits underground.</p><p>
It's all possible. &nbsp;But powering a home with Hydrogen separated from water with solar electric power? &nbsp;Economically impossible for all but the very wealthy.</p><p>
And a bad idea even then.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good thread bio-d!</strong></p><p>It gives me another chance to tout my solutions.</p><p>
Water and home heating with direct solar, passive as with sunflower's excellent design, and active as with a trough collectors heating a pumped fluid.</p><p>
And really efficient appliances, like a dryer that uses stored heat instead of electric heat, and releases that heat back into the home.</p><p>
In your case of cloudy, rainy winters a geothermal heat pump to do the rest of the heating. &nbsp;And really long term heat storage built into the home. &nbsp;Heat storage phase change salt in the basement maybe? &nbsp;</p><p>
Solar electric power cogenerated in the same trough collectors. &nbsp;Extra electric power for home use from offshore wind/wave in your region. And from river current power, without hydroelectric dams. Backup power from biogas digestion of waste with the biogas used in solid oxide fuel cell/turbines. &nbsp;</p><p>
Natural gas as the ultimate fossil emergency fuel, hundreds of years worth can be converted from coal deposits underground.</p><p>
It's all possible. &nbsp;But powering a home with Hydrogen separated from water with solar electric power? &nbsp;Economically impossible for all but the very wealthy.</p><p>
And a bad idea even then.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>