<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for But aren&#8217;t those things mutually exclusive?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by A Siegel</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/energy-efficiency-and-economic-growth/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:07:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/energy-efficiency-and-economic-growth/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This is important ...<p>and a message that I try to emphasize with people. <p>
All we need to do is look at all of Amory Lovins work with an open eye and realize that we could greatly strenghten our society while using a fraction of the energy we do today.<p>
And, some major companies get it. &nbsp;For example, <a href="http://www2.dupont.com/Sustainability/en_US/Newsroom/speeches/coh_101006.html" rel="nofollow">Dupont, according to Chad Holliway, Dupont's Chief Executive Officer<p>
in 1994, Dupont set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by the year 2000. &nbsp;They achieved that goal on schedule. &nbsp;Then Dupont set a goal to reduce its greenhouse emissions by 65 percent by 2010. &nbsp;They made that goal as well. &nbsp;In fact, they achieved a 72 percent reduction by 2004, six years ahead of schedule, and avoided costs of over $3 billion by holding Dupont's energy use six percent below 1990 levels. <br>
Yet, too many think that there is a trade-off between the economy and the environment. Willing to trade a dying planet for another 1/10th of percent of GDP growth.</br></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This is important ...<p>and a message that I try to emphasize with people. <p>
All we need to do is look at all of Amory Lovins work with an open eye and realize that we could greatly strenghten our society while using a fraction of the energy we do today.<p>
And, some major companies get it. &nbsp;For example, <a href="http://www2.dupont.com/Sustainability/en_US/Newsroom/speeches/coh_101006.html" rel="nofollow">Dupont, according to Chad Holliway, Dupont's Chief Executive Officer<p>
in 1994, Dupont set a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by the year 2000. &nbsp;They achieved that goal on schedule. &nbsp;Then Dupont set a goal to reduce its greenhouse emissions by 65 percent by 2010. &nbsp;They made that goal as well. &nbsp;In fact, they achieved a 72 percent reduction by 2004, six years ahead of schedule, and avoided costs of over $3 billion by holding Dupont's energy use six percent below 1990 levels. <br>
Yet, too many think that there is a trade-off between the economy and the environment. Willing to trade a dying planet for another 1/10th of percent of GDP growth.</br></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>