<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Two enviro groups endorse their faves for U.S. president in &#8216;08]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by askantik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/endors/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:25:59 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/endors/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>So effectively...<p>Friends of the Earth Action is settling on the best "top tier" candidate rather than the best overall candidate. &nbsp;It's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that Dennis Kucinich has the strongest environmental policies. &nbsp;Whether or not you agree with his stance on other issues, you have to know that he stands stronger than any other candidate on green issues.<p>
The fact that organizations like this one are embracing candidates that are the "lesser of the top tier evils" is pathetic. &nbsp;Maybe if we embraced who we really thought should win, we'd end up with a President who actually did something. &nbsp;I'm not necessarily criticizing them for not endorsing Dennis, because everyone has their own opinion, but it's just like how certain unions are endorsing John Edwards when it is TOTALLY obvious that Dennis Kucinich was by far the most moving speaker at the event at Soldier Field. &nbsp;No one else got a standing ovation and, as Dennis said, no other candidate is a card-carrying union member.<p>
Why are people settling on something that is less than the best when the best IS an option? &nbsp;Maybe if instead of settling on someone who is sub-par, if we supported who we thought should REALLY win (no matter who that person is), then there'd be more than just the "top tier" candidates. &nbsp;I'm supporting Dennis Kucinich up until the primaries are over and if he doesn't win the nomination, I'll support him when he hopefully runs as an Independent. &nbsp;<b>I do not feel that the "top tier" candidates selected by the mass media are the best choices to be the top-ranking official in the most powerful nation of the entire world. &nbsp;Do you?<p>
<b>Watch some videos of Dennis Kucinich at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/denniskucinich" rel="nofollow">the official DK YouTube channel, visit his <a href="http://www.dennis4president.com" rel="nofollow">official website, and finally, <a href="http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/08/01/kucinich/index.html" rel="nofollow">check out his interview right here on Grist. &nbsp;I think if you do some research, you'll see that Dennis is in fact full of honesty, integrity, and courage and that he is truly a great alternative to selecting the "lesser of evils" from the media-chosen top tier candidates.</a></a></a></b></p></b></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>So effectively...<p>Friends of the Earth Action is settling on the best "top tier" candidate rather than the best overall candidate. &nbsp;It's quite obvious to anyone with a brain that Dennis Kucinich has the strongest environmental policies. &nbsp;Whether or not you agree with his stance on other issues, you have to know that he stands stronger than any other candidate on green issues.<p>
The fact that organizations like this one are embracing candidates that are the "lesser of the top tier evils" is pathetic. &nbsp;Maybe if we embraced who we really thought should win, we'd end up with a President who actually did something. &nbsp;I'm not necessarily criticizing them for not endorsing Dennis, because everyone has their own opinion, but it's just like how certain unions are endorsing John Edwards when it is TOTALLY obvious that Dennis Kucinich was by far the most moving speaker at the event at Soldier Field. &nbsp;No one else got a standing ovation and, as Dennis said, no other candidate is a card-carrying union member.<p>
Why are people settling on something that is less than the best when the best IS an option? &nbsp;Maybe if instead of settling on someone who is sub-par, if we supported who we thought should REALLY win (no matter who that person is), then there'd be more than just the "top tier" candidates. &nbsp;I'm supporting Dennis Kucinich up until the primaries are over and if he doesn't win the nomination, I'll support him when he hopefully runs as an Independent. &nbsp;<b>I do not feel that the "top tier" candidates selected by the mass media are the best choices to be the top-ranking official in the most powerful nation of the entire world. &nbsp;Do you?<p>
<b>Watch some videos of Dennis Kucinich at <a href="http://www.youtube.com/denniskucinich" rel="nofollow">the official DK YouTube channel, visit his <a href="http://www.dennis4president.com" rel="nofollow">official website, and finally, <a href="http://www.grist.org/feature/2007/08/01/kucinich/index.html" rel="nofollow">check out his interview right here on Grist. &nbsp;I think if you do some research, you'll see that Dennis is in fact full of honesty, integrity, and courage and that he is truly a great alternative to selecting the "lesser of evils" from the media-chosen top tier candidates.</a></a></a></b></p></b></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by iprefertherain</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/endors/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:38:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/endors/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>climate change - conservative cause????</strong></p><p>Really? REALLY? And what's the Republican record on climate change? Say the presidents? For example? </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>climate change - conservative cause????</strong></p><p>Really? REALLY? And what's the Republican record on climate change? Say the presidents? For example? </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>