<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Another agrofuel protest hits City Hall]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:10:03 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Geez, BioD...</strong></p><p>...no wonder you don't like government intervention. &nbsp;The worst part of the tale is putting pensions into Imperium -- I remember many years ago being blown away at the level of resources in pensions (was 1 trillion, now much more), and it seemed to some of us that that money could be best used to resuscitate the manufacturing sector. &nbsp;As it is, I think pension funds have been used mostly to destroy the manufacturing sector, even from industrial union funds, financing the outsourcing process. &nbsp;Looks like Seattle gave our idea a bad name!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Geez, BioD...</strong></p><p>...no wonder you don't like government intervention. &nbsp;The worst part of the tale is putting pensions into Imperium -- I remember many years ago being blown away at the level of resources in pensions (was 1 trillion, now much more), and it seemed to some of us that that money could be best used to resuscitate the manufacturing sector. &nbsp;As it is, I think pension funds have been used mostly to destroy the manufacturing sector, even from industrial union funds, financing the outsourcing process. &nbsp;Looks like Seattle gave our idea a bad name!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Billhook</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:40:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Surely farmable land is the critical shortage,</strong></p><p>not food crops themselves?</p><p>
The options of taking farmland and planting Switchgrass, <br>
or mixed prairie plants, <br>
or minimum rotation input-dependent monoculture coppice,<br>
or sustainable moderate rotation polyculture coppice &amp; standards,<br>
all share a crucial weakness:- that of removing farmland from food production.</p><p>
Yet the last option, Coppice &amp; Standards, as it does not require mechanized treatment or harvesting,<br>
has traditionally been established on land too steep &amp;/or too poor for agriculture.</p><p>
Given this distinction, the diverse fuels that can be refined from Coppice feedstock <br>
maybe warrant a new and distinct title, being:<br>
"Sylvifuels" ?</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Bill</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Surely farmable land is the critical shortage,</strong></p><p>not food crops themselves?</p><p>
The options of taking farmland and planting Switchgrass, <br>
or mixed prairie plants, <br>
or minimum rotation input-dependent monoculture coppice,<br>
or sustainable moderate rotation polyculture coppice &amp; standards,<br>
all share a crucial weakness:- that of removing farmland from food production.</p><p>
Yet the last option, Coppice &amp; Standards, as it does not require mechanized treatment or harvesting,<br>
has traditionally been established on land too steep &amp;/or too poor for agriculture.</p><p>
Given this distinction, the diverse fuels that can be refined from Coppice feedstock <br>
maybe warrant a new and distinct title, being:<br>
"Sylvifuels" ?</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Bill</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Sam Wells</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:19:22 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Those crazy Seattle-ites</strong></p><p>I've done a bunch of work for those people on the waterfront, such as ships and terminal equipment, and Seattle went nuts on bio-diesel. &nbsp;I mean nuts! &nbsp;I tried to lay it out, that there was six or seven kinds of bio-diesel in varying proportions of diesel mixtures, each with different effects on NOx and CO2, but they had no patience. &nbsp;I took my money and ran. &nbsp;Worst client ever. &nbsp;Bunch of crazy assholes, they were. &nbsp;/sammie

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Those crazy Seattle-ites</strong></p><p>I've done a bunch of work for those people on the waterfront, such as ships and terminal equipment, and Seattle went nuts on bio-diesel. &nbsp;I mean nuts! &nbsp;I tried to lay it out, that there was six or seven kinds of bio-diesel in varying proportions of diesel mixtures, each with different effects on NOx and CO2, but they had no patience. &nbsp;I took my money and ran. &nbsp;Worst client ever. &nbsp;Bunch of crazy assholes, they were. &nbsp;/sammie

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Pangolin</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:38:21 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We can't use farmland<p>Bill's coppice idea has a lot of merit. I'm not sure if you can coppice hazelnuts, walnuts, or beechnuts but any almond orchard is effectively a coppice. <p>
Olives, whose wood is usefull for spoons and tools, will grow on land that would be marginal for any other purpose. Oil used for industrial uses need not be of the first quality. Avacados grow wherever there is little frost and adequate water and soil for them to grow and are mostly oil in the fruits. <p>
<a href="http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html" rel="nofollow">This chart might be helpful.

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We can't use farmland<p>Bill's coppice idea has a lot of merit. I'm not sure if you can coppice hazelnuts, walnuts, or beechnuts but any almond orchard is effectively a coppice. <p>
Olives, whose wood is usefull for spoons and tools, will grow on land that would be marginal for any other purpose. Oil used for industrial uses need not be of the first quality. Avacados grow wherever there is little frost and adequate water and soil for them to grow and are mostly oil in the fruits. <p>
<a href="http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html" rel="nofollow">This chart might be helpful.

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Pangolin</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:38:44 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We can't use farmland<p>Bill's coppice idea has a lot of merit. I'm not sure if you can coppice hazelnuts, walnuts, or beechnuts but any almond orchard is effectively a coppice. <p>
Olives, whose wood is usefull for spoons and tools, will grow on land that would be marginal for any other purpose. Oil used for industrial uses need not be of the first quality. Avacados grow wherever there is little frost and adequate water and soil for them to grow and are mostly oil in the fruits. <p>
<a href="http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html" rel="nofollow">This chart might be helpful.

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>We can't use farmland<p>Bill's coppice idea has a lot of merit. I'm not sure if you can coppice hazelnuts, walnuts, or beechnuts but any almond orchard is effectively a coppice. <p>
Olives, whose wood is usefull for spoons and tools, will grow on land that would be marginal for any other purpose. Oil used for industrial uses need not be of the first quality. Avacados grow wherever there is little frost and adequate water and soil for them to grow and are mostly oil in the fruits. <p>
<a href="http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html" rel="nofollow">This chart might be helpful.

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by Ron Steenblik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:26:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Not altruism, but economics<p>At the time Imperium was first planning to use palm oil, the price was probably a lot lower than it is now. What has happened over the last 18 months is that not only have the prices of vegetable oils -- all vegetable oils -- skyrocketed, but the prices of lower grade oils, like palm oil, have narrowed the gap with the prices for higher-grade oils, like canola and soybean oil. Here are some numbers, taken from the FAO's "<a href="http://www.fao.org/es/esc/prices" rel="nofollow">International Commodity Prices" website:<p>
Average prices in 2005 (US$ per metric ton):<p>
Rapeseed (canola) ...... 669<br>
Soybean oil ............ 545<br>
Palm oil ............... 422<p>
Latest prices (average for August 2007):<p>
Rapeseed (canola) ...... 955<br>
Soybean oil ............ 908<br>
Palm oil ............... 821<p>
Note that over this period the relative price of soybean oil has narrowed from 81% to 95% of the price of canola oil, and palm oil has narrowed from 63% to 86% of the price of canola oil.<p>
So for a company like Imperium to now sound less keen on palm oil has as much to do with economics as with community relations. <p>
I use the term "economics" advisedly, of course. Imperium would benefit from a federal tax credit of $1.00 per gallon, as well as a myriad of <a href="http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/progs/search_state.cgi?afdc/WA" rel="nofollow">state-level incentives that benefit producers and merchants of biodiesel and biodiesel blends.<p>
On the other hand, when the price of your feedstock has almost doubled in a year and a half (if you were basing your business on imported palm oil), it is difficult to imagine any biodiesel manufacturer making much of a profit these days.</p></a></p></p></p></br></br></p></p></br></br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Not altruism, but economics<p>At the time Imperium was first planning to use palm oil, the price was probably a lot lower than it is now. What has happened over the last 18 months is that not only have the prices of vegetable oils -- all vegetable oils -- skyrocketed, but the prices of lower grade oils, like palm oil, have narrowed the gap with the prices for higher-grade oils, like canola and soybean oil. Here are some numbers, taken from the FAO's "<a href="http://www.fao.org/es/esc/prices" rel="nofollow">International Commodity Prices" website:<p>
Average prices in 2005 (US$ per metric ton):<p>
Rapeseed (canola) ...... 669<br>
Soybean oil ............ 545<br>
Palm oil ............... 422<p>
Latest prices (average for August 2007):<p>
Rapeseed (canola) ...... 955<br>
Soybean oil ............ 908<br>
Palm oil ............... 821<p>
Note that over this period the relative price of soybean oil has narrowed from 81% to 95% of the price of canola oil, and palm oil has narrowed from 63% to 86% of the price of canola oil.<p>
So for a company like Imperium to now sound less keen on palm oil has as much to do with economics as with community relations. <p>
I use the term "economics" advisedly, of course. Imperium would benefit from a federal tax credit of $1.00 per gallon, as well as a myriad of <a href="http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/progs/search_state.cgi?afdc/WA" rel="nofollow">state-level incentives that benefit producers and merchants of biodiesel and biodiesel blends.<p>
On the other hand, when the price of your feedstock has almost doubled in a year and a half (if you were basing your business on imported palm oil), it is difficult to imagine any biodiesel manufacturer making much of a profit these days.</p></a></p></p></p></br></br></p></p></br></br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Ron Steenblik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:12:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Correction</strong></p><p>In my previous post, I should have added the word "oil" after "Rapeseed (canola)" in the table. That is to say, the prices refer to "Rapeseed (canola) oil", not rapeseed.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Correction</strong></p><p>In my previous post, I should have added the word "oil" after "Rapeseed (canola)" in the table. That is to say, the prices refer to "Rapeseed (canola) oil", not rapeseed.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Ron Steenblik</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:38:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Breaking news!<p>The Times of London has just published an <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2507851.ece" rel="nofollow">article reporting on the findings of a study soon to be published in the open-access journal, <a href="http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/index.html" rel="nofollow">Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Here's a quote from the Times article:<p>
Rapeseed and maize [sic] biodiesels were calculated to produce up to 70 per cent and 50 per cent more greenhouse gases respectively than fossil fuels. The concerns were raised over the levels of emissions of nitrous oxide, which is 296 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Scientists found that the use of biofuels released twice as much nitrous oxide as previously realised. The research team found that 3 to 5 per cent of the nitrogen in fertiliser was converted and emitted. In contrast, the figure used by the International Panel on Climate Change, which assesses the extent and impact of man-made global warming, was 2 per cent. The findings illustrated the importance, the researchers said, of ensuring that measures designed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions are assessed thoroughly before being hailed as a solution. <p>
"One wants rational decisions rather than simply jumping on the bandwagon because superficially something appears to reduce emissions," said Keith Smith, a professor at the University of Edinburgh and one of the researchers.<br>
</br></p></p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Breaking news!<p>The Times of London has just published an <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article2507851.ece" rel="nofollow">article reporting on the findings of a study soon to be published in the open-access journal, <a href="http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/index.html" rel="nofollow">Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Here's a quote from the Times article:<p>
Rapeseed and maize [sic] biodiesels were calculated to produce up to 70 per cent and 50 per cent more greenhouse gases respectively than fossil fuels. The concerns were raised over the levels of emissions of nitrous oxide, which is 296 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Scientists found that the use of biofuels released twice as much nitrous oxide as previously realised. The research team found that 3 to 5 per cent of the nitrogen in fertiliser was converted and emitted. In contrast, the figure used by the International Panel on Climate Change, which assesses the extent and impact of man-made global warming, was 2 per cent. The findings illustrated the importance, the researchers said, of ensuring that measures designed to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions are assessed thoroughly before being hailed as a solution. <p>
"One wants rational decisions rather than simply jumping on the bandwagon because superficially something appears to reduce emissions," said Keith Smith, a professor at the University of Edinburgh and one of the researchers.<br>
</br></p></p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:19:54 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wow, great comments, Ron<p>I'll be adding that study to my growing list.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Wow, great comments, Ron<p>I'll be adding that study to my growing list.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:13:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah Ron<p>I been bugging people about that study for a while now :P<p>
It's the N2O factor they underestimated by more than a factor of 2x.<p>
<a href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd-7-11191-2007.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd- ...<br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/09/study-n2o-emiss.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/09/study-n2o-emiss.h ... <br>
<a href="http://www.alphagalileo.org/index.cfm?_rss=1&amp;fuseaction=readrelease&amp;releaseid=523518" rel="nofollow">http://www.alphagalileo.org/index.cfm?_rss=1&amp;fuseacti ...<p>
_<p>
Also in other news, looks like the Institute for Policy Studies got around to publishing the official copy of the new Patzek/Pimentel policy paper.<p>
<a href="http://ips-dc.org/reports/070915_biofuels_report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ips-dc.org/reports/070915_biofuels_report.pdf </a></p></p></p></a></br></a></br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah Ron<p>I been bugging people about that study for a while now :P<p>
It's the N2O factor they underestimated by more than a factor of 2x.<p>
<a href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd-7-11191-2007.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/11191/2007/acpd- ...<br>
<a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/09/study-n2o-emiss.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/09/study-n2o-emiss.h ... <br>
<a href="http://www.alphagalileo.org/index.cfm?_rss=1&amp;fuseaction=readrelease&amp;releaseid=523518" rel="nofollow">http://www.alphagalileo.org/index.cfm?_rss=1&amp;fuseacti ...<p>
_<p>
Also in other news, looks like the Institute for Policy Studies got around to publishing the official copy of the new Patzek/Pimentel policy paper.<p>
<a href="http://ips-dc.org/reports/070915_biofuels_report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ips-dc.org/reports/070915_biofuels_report.pdf </a></p></p></p></a></br></a></br></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:16:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Which of course<p>Incidentally makes nitrogen fixing plants, and plants with high nitrogen demands automatically a bad idea.<p>
i.e. Practically all of them.<p>
And that includes Jathropha. (<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=jatropha+nitrogen" rel="nofollow">Especially Jatropha)</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Which of course<p>Incidentally makes nitrogen fixing plants, and plants with high nitrogen demands automatically a bad idea.<p>
i.e. Practically all of them.<p>
And that includes Jathropha. (<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=jatropha+nitrogen" rel="nofollow">Especially Jatropha)</a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:25:11 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ooh, nifty<p>Youtube stuff.<p>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgcE8czaMR4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgcE8czaMR4<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpm3iJsls80" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpm3iJsls80</a></br></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ooh, nifty<p>Youtube stuff.<p>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgcE8czaMR4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgcE8czaMR4<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpm3iJsls80" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpm3iJsls80</a></br></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:52:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You are the King of links, Greyflcn<p>Especially liked that first youtube link and the one to the paper.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>You are the King of links, Greyflcn<p>Especially liked that first youtube link and the one to the paper.

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by Billhook</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:16:14 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Of Babies, Bathwater, &amp;c</strong></p><p>Pangolin - some good news for you -</p><p>
Hazel is an excellent coppice tree, and was traditionally the staple material for many vital rural artifacts - <br>
While most deciduous trees will regrow from the stump, some, like Sweet Chestnut, Ash &amp; Hazel do so really well and will gain wood about 20% faster than a normal specimen,<br>
thus improving the methanol + TP-charcoal &nbsp;feedstock yield /acre /year.</p><p>
We have many Ash &amp; Hazel on the farm here in the Cambrian mountains of Wales,<br>
but the very damaging Canadian Grey Squirrel invaded the UK so we eat rather more squirrel than Hazelnuts.</p><p>
Hazelnut as a flammble oil source is a novel idea to me, and adds to the goal of eradicating the greys in favour of the native red<br>
(not least to allow the production of Hazlenut butter, which puts peanut butter in deep shade).</p><p>
It's very good to see that a scientist of Crutzen's renown makes the point of distinguishing between the best and the worst of biofuels :-<br>
"...the production of commonly used biofuels, such as biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), can contribute as much or more to global warming by N2O emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Crops with less N demand, such as grasses and woody coppice species have more favourable climate impacts." </p><p>
Traditional coppice of course requires no chem fertilizer inputs.</p><p>
Grey Flcn -</p><p>
I can't follow your critique of nitrogen fixing plants -<br>
As I understand it, the problem Crutzen addresses is particularly with agricultural fertilizer nitrogen ending up as NO2 outputs.</p><p>
So how does atmospheric nitrogen being fixed naturally in the soil by plants, <br>
thus greatly reducing or even ending fertilizer demand, <br>
become a problem ?</p><p>
Many thanks for the link to "Growing Solutions"</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Bill<br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Of Babies, Bathwater, &amp;c</strong></p><p>Pangolin - some good news for you -</p><p>
Hazel is an excellent coppice tree, and was traditionally the staple material for many vital rural artifacts - <br>
While most deciduous trees will regrow from the stump, some, like Sweet Chestnut, Ash &amp; Hazel do so really well and will gain wood about 20% faster than a normal specimen,<br>
thus improving the methanol + TP-charcoal &nbsp;feedstock yield /acre /year.</p><p>
We have many Ash &amp; Hazel on the farm here in the Cambrian mountains of Wales,<br>
but the very damaging Canadian Grey Squirrel invaded the UK so we eat rather more squirrel than Hazelnuts.</p><p>
Hazelnut as a flammble oil source is a novel idea to me, and adds to the goal of eradicating the greys in favour of the native red<br>
(not least to allow the production of Hazlenut butter, which puts peanut butter in deep shade).</p><p>
It's very good to see that a scientist of Crutzen's renown makes the point of distinguishing between the best and the worst of biofuels :-<br>
"...the production of commonly used biofuels, such as biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), can contribute as much or more to global warming by N2O emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Crops with less N demand, such as grasses and woody coppice species have more favourable climate impacts." </p><p>
Traditional coppice of course requires no chem fertilizer inputs.</p><p>
Grey Flcn -</p><p>
I can't follow your critique of nitrogen fixing plants -<br>
As I understand it, the problem Crutzen addresses is particularly with agricultural fertilizer nitrogen ending up as NO2 outputs.</p><p>
So how does atmospheric nitrogen being fixed naturally in the soil by plants, <br>
thus greatly reducing or even ending fertilizer demand, <br>
become a problem ?</p><p>
Many thanks for the link to "Growing Solutions"</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Bill<br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #15 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:46:44 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dirty-hippies-at-it-again/15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Why would<p>So how does atmospheric nitrogen being fixed naturally in the soil by plants,<br>
thus greatly reducing or even ending fertilizer demand, become a problem ?<p>
It's all the same chemical compound.<br>
Why would the atmosphere treat one or the other differently?<p>
For instance, the USDA model does not include N2O emissions from atmospheric nitrogen fixed by soybeans, while the UCDavis Model does, contributing to an almost order of magnitude greater estimated of Global Warming Impact for soybean biodiesel.<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/n2o.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/n2o.png</a></br></p></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Why would<p>So how does atmospheric nitrogen being fixed naturally in the soil by plants,<br>
thus greatly reducing or even ending fertilizer demand, become a problem ?<p>
It's all the same chemical compound.<br>
Why would the atmosphere treat one or the other differently?<p>
For instance, the USDA model does not include N2O emissions from atmospheric nitrogen fixed by soybeans, while the UCDavis Model does, contributing to an almost order of magnitude greater estimated of Global Warming Impact for soybean biodiesel.<br>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/n2o.png" rel="nofollow">http://greyfalcon.net/n2o.png</a></br></p></br></p></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>