<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Some Democrats in Congress bending on drilling debate]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by alphaniner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:45:59 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>orly?</strong></p><p>Did anybody not see this coming? &nbsp;Literally all that this administration and Congress can do is make pretend fixes that actually do more harm than good. &nbsp;This will sadly be no different:(</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>orly?</strong></p><p>Did anybody not see this coming? &nbsp;Literally all that this administration and Congress can do is make pretend fixes that actually do more harm than good. &nbsp;This will sadly be no different:(</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by randino</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:58:16 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One of these days</strong></p><p>the Democrats are either going to have to produce some of the change they promised, or just do themselves a favor and shut up. On Iraq they have rolled over, on energy they have rolled over, and on FISA they rolled over. Is there no limit to their rolling? </p><p>
Then they wonder why Congress is more unpopular than pedophiles. </p><p>
Randy Cunningham<br>
Cleveland, OH

<p>Randy Cunningham</p></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>One of these days</strong></p><p>the Democrats are either going to have to produce some of the change they promised, or just do themselves a favor and shut up. On Iraq they have rolled over, on energy they have rolled over, and on FISA they rolled over. Is there no limit to their rolling? </p><p>
Then they wonder why Congress is more unpopular than pedophiles. </p><p>
Randy Cunningham<br>
Cleveland, OH

<p>Randy Cunningham</p></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GRLCowan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:23:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Is anyone here curious about marine oil prospects?<p>The radio is saying 2600 km^2 of California has burned. Has recently burned. Isn't that, like, 1 percent of the whole state? Perhaps it's parts where no-one lives. Well, it's definitely that now, but perhaps before, too.<p>
Oil mining is bad, but I wonder about the wisdom of projecting that American oil prospecting in the ocean will be so much less effective than <a href="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;q=%7Ebrazil+%22offshore+oil%22%7C%22offshore+petroleum%22+%22million+barrels+per%7Ca+day%22&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">Brazil's has seemed to be. Are there geological reasons for this expectation?<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996<br>
<a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html</a></br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Is anyone here curious about marine oil prospects?<p>The radio is saying 2600 km^2 of California has burned. Has recently burned. Isn't that, like, 1 percent of the whole state? Perhaps it's parts where no-one lives. Well, it's definitely that now, but perhaps before, too.<p>
Oil mining is bad, but I wonder about the wisdom of projecting that American oil prospecting in the ocean will be so much less effective than <a href="http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&amp;q=%7Ebrazil+%22offshore+oil%22%7C%22offshore+petroleum%22+%22million+barrels+per%7Ca+day%22&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">Brazil's has seemed to be. Are there geological reasons for this expectation?<p>
--- G.R.L. Cowan, H2 energy fan 'til ~1996<br>
<a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html</a></br></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by stevenearlsalmony</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:37:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Did anyone here notice that  the..........<p>human population worldwide is exploding, that yesterday was World Population Day and that too many of our leading politicians and mass media moguls did not take advantage of World Population Day by so much as mentioning this "mother" of all human-driven global challenges?<p>
Yesterday was World Population Day. Can anyone name one world leader or mass media organization to direct our attention to this momentous event? <p>
After all, if Earth cannot be expected to sustain the skyrocketing growth of global human population, perhaps there is a case to be made for political leaders and mass media "talking heads" to advocate family planning, health education and contraception programs universally, freely and immediately available for voluntary use.<p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br>
established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></br></br></br></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Did anyone here notice that  the..........<p>human population worldwide is exploding, that yesterday was World Population Day and that too many of our leading politicians and mass media moguls did not take advantage of World Population Day by so much as mentioning this "mother" of all human-driven global challenges?<p>
Yesterday was World Population Day. Can anyone name one world leader or mass media organization to direct our attention to this momentous event? <p>
After all, if Earth cannot be expected to sustain the skyrocketing growth of global human population, perhaps there is a case to be made for political leaders and mass media "talking heads" to advocate family planning, health education and contraception programs universally, freely and immediately available for voluntary use.<p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br>
established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></br></br></br></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by archigeek</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:42:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Feh...</strong></p><p>Pandering toadies.

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Feh...</strong></p><p>Pandering toadies.

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by josullivan58</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:57:03 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Its an election year</strong></p><p>I think this is some political theater. The democrats are making a token gesture to the right to blunt the PR offensive McCain and the right have launched. I don't think it will amount to anything.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Its an election year</strong></p><p>I think this is some political theater. The democrats are making a token gesture to the right to blunt the PR offensive McCain and the right have launched. I don't think it will amount to anything.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Sam Wells</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:25:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bingo - Election Time</strong></p><p>Silly politicians always want to appear in control of things, even though they can't do diddley squat. &nbsp;</p><p>
A far greater vision would be to sponsor large clean energy projects such as wind, solar, wave, and thermal - almost a competitive "shootout" if you will. </p><p>
This would do two things. First, employment, R&amp;D, and investment would flow to clean energy sectors using the government seed money for building infrastructure (not subsidizing energy and kW-hrs). Second, Big Oil would probably want to get some of that cash, and perhaps even try to ramp up near-term "dirty energy" supplies as well. </p><p>
Just trying to fix an emergent oil crisis is playing the cards the exact wrong way. &nbsp;

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Bingo - Election Time</strong></p><p>Silly politicians always want to appear in control of things, even though they can't do diddley squat. &nbsp;</p><p>
A far greater vision would be to sponsor large clean energy projects such as wind, solar, wave, and thermal - almost a competitive "shootout" if you will. </p><p>
This would do two things. First, employment, R&amp;D, and investment would flow to clean energy sectors using the government seed money for building infrastructure (not subsidizing energy and kW-hrs). Second, Big Oil would probably want to get some of that cash, and perhaps even try to ramp up near-term "dirty energy" supplies as well. </p><p>
Just trying to fix an emergent oil crisis is playing the cards the exact wrong way. &nbsp;

<p>Onward through the fog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by PurpleOzone</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:46:25 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/dems-the-breaks/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Energy bills</strong></p><p>Why don't the Democrats insist on some alternative energy provisions for the oil drilling?<br>
Like extending tax incentives for solar and wind, now set to expire in December.<br>
More drilling is just hair of the dog. If they really think it's politically necessary -- that the average American can be convinced it'll help by the massive campaign from the oil lobby, then why not get something for it that moves us forward?</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Energy bills</strong></p><p>Why don't the Democrats insist on some alternative energy provisions for the oil drilling?<br>
Like extending tax incentives for solar and wind, now set to expire in December.<br>
More drilling is just hair of the dog. If they really think it's politically necessary -- that the average American can be convinced it'll help by the massive campaign from the oil lobby, then why not get something for it that moves us forward?</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>