<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Moderate senators are ready to get on board]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by naturescene</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:15:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>i read through it</strong></p><p>and it sounds like a great idea to me. &nbsp;</p><p>
the senators seem to get something that Carbon Tax people don't - that some price volatility is necessary and expected. </p><p>
this is the institutional framework that is needed for a successful C&amp;T program. &nbsp;They've laid it out nicely, let's get to it.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>i read through it</strong></p><p>and it sounds like a great idea to me. &nbsp;</p><p>
the senators seem to get something that Carbon Tax people don't - that some price volatility is necessary and expected. </p><p>
this is the institutional framework that is needed for a successful C&amp;T program. &nbsp;They've laid it out nicely, let's get to it.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by naturescene</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:15:45 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>price volatility</strong></p><p>that should read "some price volatility is necessary and welcome"</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>price volatility</strong></p><p>that should read "some price volatility is necessary and welcome"</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by KiraMarch</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:23:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cost-containment-for-the-carbon-market-a-step-toward-cap-and-trade/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>nice clear post, thanks!</strong></p><p>Good job explaining a complex policy proposal!</p><p>
And just to echo -- what makes this cost containment strategy so promising is that it keeps the environmental goals front and center. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>nice clear post, thanks!</strong></p><p>Good job explaining a complex policy proposal!</p><p>
And just to echo -- what makes this cost containment strategy so promising is that it keeps the environmental goals front and center. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>