<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for <em>Physics For Future Presidents</em> fails to deliver sound climate science]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by Paleocon http://www.grist.org/article/confusing-future-presidents-part-1/ Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:35:03 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/confusing-future-presidents-part-1/1 Muller hits a nerve

I have never heard of Earl Killian, but Professor Muller is one of the most respected member's of UC Berkeley's faculty.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=095393D5B42B2266

I anticipate many more 10,000 word essays full of "dismay".

"Dismay" is what AGW fundamentalists feel when faced with "reality".

"...a 90 percent chance that the US has contributed .2 degrees F of temperature increase in the last 50 years..." The IPCC Consensus in perspective

]]> Muller hits a nerve

I have never heard of Earl Killian, but Professor Muller is one of the most respected member's of UC Berkeley's faculty.

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=095393D5B42B2266

I anticipate many more 10,000 word essays full of "dismay".

"Dismay" is what AGW fundamentalists feel when faced with "reality".

"...a 90 percent chance that the US has contributed .2 degrees F of temperature increase in the last 50 years..." The IPCC Consensus in perspective

]]> Comment #2 by Paleocon http://www.grist.org/article/confusing-future-presidents-part-1/ Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:38:44 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/confusing-future-presidents-part-1/2 Earl Killian and MoveOn.org

He gives money to ultra-left wing folks.

What a surprise.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/earl ...

"...a 90 percent chance that the US has contributed .2 degrees F of temperature increase in the last 50 years..." The IPCC Consensus in perspective

]]> Earl Killian and MoveOn.org

He gives money to ultra-left wing folks.

What a surprise.

http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/earl ...

"...a 90 percent chance that the US has contributed .2 degrees F of temperature increase in the last 50 years..." The IPCC Consensus in perspective

]]>