<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Report from EPA and U.S. Climate Change Science Program highlights risks of warming world]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:07:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Simple To Prove</strong></p><p><br>
Climate has been "changing" with increasing temperatures for 1.5 Centuries now.</p><p>
If their projections are correct, one could do a historic correlation showing that each of their claims make have some evidence.</p><p>
So far, all I hear is a lot of "ifs" and "maybes"...</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Simple To Prove</strong></p><p><br>
Climate has been "changing" with increasing temperatures for 1.5 Centuries now.</p><p>
If their projections are correct, one could do a historic correlation showing that each of their claims make have some evidence.</p><p>
So far, all I hear is a lot of "ifs" and "maybes"...</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GonzoDon</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:58:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Story Grist Didn't Feature</strong></p><p>Uh-oh alert. &nbsp;From today's AOL News page:</p><p>
"A record number of babies were born in the USA in 2007, according to early federal data released Wednesday ...</p><p>
"Demographers have been monitoring gradual increases in recent years; data for 2006, which won't be made final until September, show a 3% increase over 2005. That's the largest single-year increase since 1989.</p><p>
"I suspect this is the beginning of a new kind of baby boom" says demographer Arthur Nelson of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City."</p><p>
Here's the other part of this news flash: &nbsp;All 4,315,000 kids born in the US last year will eventually want their own air-conditioning, their own central heating, their own places to live, their own Chilean sea bass flown in from 5,000 miles away, and eventually, of course, their own automobiles.</p><p>
So please explain to me again how we plan to offset all of that additional greenhouse gas production to support all of that additional consumption. &nbsp;Sigh. &nbsp;</p><p>
Regardless of our most heroic efforts, we're doomed until we can bring the birth rate back into balance with the death rate. &nbsp;Sad but true.</p><p>
Grist, when will you add exponential population growth to your list of high-priority topics needing open discussion?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>A Story Grist Didn't Feature</strong></p><p>Uh-oh alert. &nbsp;From today's AOL News page:</p><p>
"A record number of babies were born in the USA in 2007, according to early federal data released Wednesday ...</p><p>
"Demographers have been monitoring gradual increases in recent years; data for 2006, which won't be made final until September, show a 3% increase over 2005. That's the largest single-year increase since 1989.</p><p>
"I suspect this is the beginning of a new kind of baby boom" says demographer Arthur Nelson of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City."</p><p>
Here's the other part of this news flash: &nbsp;All 4,315,000 kids born in the US last year will eventually want their own air-conditioning, their own central heating, their own places to live, their own Chilean sea bass flown in from 5,000 miles away, and eventually, of course, their own automobiles.</p><p>
So please explain to me again how we plan to offset all of that additional greenhouse gas production to support all of that additional consumption. &nbsp;Sigh. &nbsp;</p><p>
Regardless of our most heroic efforts, we're doomed until we can bring the birth rate back into balance with the death rate. &nbsp;Sad but true.</p><p>
Grist, when will you add exponential population growth to your list of high-priority topics needing open discussion?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:12:09 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-still-bad/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Kids Love Them Warmings!</strong></p><p>"Demographers have been monitoring gradual increases in recent years; data for 2006, which won't be made final until September, show a 3% increase over 2005. That's the largest single-year increase since 1989.</p><p>
Kids know what's good for them.</p><p>
Hot summers and mild winters.</p><p>
Be fruitful, and multiply, gremlins..</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Kids Love Them Warmings!</strong></p><p>"Demographers have been monitoring gradual increases in recent years; data for 2006, which won't be made final until September, show a 3% increase over 2005. That's the largest single-year increase since 1989.</p><p>
Kids know what's good for them.</p><p>
Hot summers and mild winters.</p><p>
Be fruitful, and multiply, gremlins..</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>