<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Climate change and the null hypothesis]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by Paleocon http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/ Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:05:49 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/1 It is all so clear to him

Where can I find the specific predictions that can be tested by observation over time to establish if he is correct?

In 1988 it was pointless to argue with those who were "not deniers" when they claimed that the world's oceans would be devoid of life by 1998.

Harold Camping says the world is going to end October 21, 2011. I think it will be easy to dispute this on October 22, 2011.

Often misunderestimated

]]> It is all so clear to him

Where can I find the specific predictions that can be tested by observation over time to establish if he is correct?

In 1988 it was pointless to argue with those who were "not deniers" when they claimed that the world's oceans would be devoid of life by 1998.

Harold Camping says the world is going to end October 21, 2011. I think it will be easy to dispute this on October 22, 2011.

Often misunderestimated

]]> Comment #2 by Steve Bloom http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/ Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:27:14 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/2 The difference

A denialist may appear to be a skeptic in some regards, but they give away the game when they make ridiculous claims like:

'In 1988 it was pointless to argue with those who were "not deniers" when they claimed that the world's oceans would be devoid of life by 1998.'

]]> The difference

A denialist may appear to be a skeptic in some regards, but they give away the game when they make ridiculous claims like:

'In 1988 it was pointless to argue with those who were "not deniers" when they claimed that the world's oceans would be devoid of life by 1998.'

]]> Comment #3 by Paleocon http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/ Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:31:11 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/climate-change-and-the-null-hypothesis/3 Ridculous?

In 1988 it was claimed that the oceans had 10 years left. It didn't happen. The very same folks are the loudest shouters of "Denier" when their AGW hypothesis is challenged.

And you intellectual reply it is say, "ridiculous".

Condescension and arrogance.

Often misunderestimated

]]> Ridculous?

In 1988 it was claimed that the oceans had 10 years left. It didn't happen. The very same folks are the loudest shouters of "Denier" when their AGW hypothesis is challenged.

And you intellectual reply it is say, "ridiculous".

Condescension and arrogance.

Often misunderestimated

]]>