<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for The offshore drilling hoax, part 2]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sebaph01</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/chomping-at-the-drill-bit/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:27:03 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/chomping-at-the-drill-bit/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Chomping At the Drill Bit</strong></p><p>But it doesn't really seem like the Democrats are doing a good job defending themselves and at least eloquently addressing the American public the reasons why we should oppose offshore drilling. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Chomping At the Drill Bit</strong></p><p>But it doesn't really seem like the Democrats are doing a good job defending themselves and at least eloquently addressing the American public the reasons why we should oppose offshore drilling. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by timbuktu</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/chomping-at-the-drill-bit/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:56:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/chomping-at-the-drill-bit/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What are the Dems doing?<p>As the party that traditionally champions for the working class, Democrats should come out and say that they are adamantly against high oil prices, and that they want to reduce the costs to the consumer in the long term. This would highlight how more oil drilling is not a sustainable strategy for long-term energy price reductions. Right now the Republicans have the democrats in a bind because they are focusing on the short term. If the Democrats could talk a bit more about energy longevity they wouldn't look so weak on the issue. It also wouldn't hurt to point out that oil companies have 70 million accessible acres still on lease that they could tap into if we really wanted to fix the situation with a short term flow of oil (See <a href="http://www.brightfuture.us/new/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=170&amp;Itemid=71" rel="nofollow">This Is Not A Drill).</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>What are the Dems doing?<p>As the party that traditionally champions for the working class, Democrats should come out and say that they are adamantly against high oil prices, and that they want to reduce the costs to the consumer in the long term. This would highlight how more oil drilling is not a sustainable strategy for long-term energy price reductions. Right now the Republicans have the democrats in a bind because they are focusing on the short term. If the Democrats could talk a bit more about energy longevity they wouldn't look so weak on the issue. It also wouldn't hurt to point out that oil companies have 70 million accessible acres still on lease that they could tap into if we really wanted to fix the situation with a short term flow of oil (See <a href="http://www.brightfuture.us/new/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=170&amp;Itemid=71" rel="nofollow">This Is Not A Drill).</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>