<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Chicago will levy bottled-water tax, Big Bottle plans to sue]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by mmcconne</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/chicago/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/chicago/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Revenue</strong></p><p>Does anyone know if there are specific plans for the revenue? &nbsp;Could it be applied to bottle-specific costs? &nbsp;Clean-up, health concerns...<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Revenue</strong></p><p>Does anyone know if there are specific plans for the revenue? &nbsp;Could it be applied to bottle-specific costs? &nbsp;Clean-up, health concerns...<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by katakanadian</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/chicago/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:10:51 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/chicago/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah, riiiiight.</strong></p><p>And because taxes will add about 30 percent to the overall cost of a case of bottled water ... it's a change that is going to price many shoppers out of a healthy alternative to sugary beverages, Vite said.</p><p>
Because, you know, people can't afford to choose free tap water over expensive bottled alternatives (with or without a bottle levy).</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah, riiiiight.</strong></p><p>And because taxes will add about 30 percent to the overall cost of a case of bottled water ... it's a change that is going to price many shoppers out of a healthy alternative to sugary beverages, Vite said.</p><p>
Because, you know, people can't afford to choose free tap water over expensive bottled alternatives (with or without a bottle levy).</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>