<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for He doesn&#8217;t want the Saudis getting all confused, you know]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by odograph</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 20:33:57 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>plans</strong></p><p>I try to keep a flexible mind, and parse out the various plans we might have, and their implications.</p><p>
There is certainly a "free market plan" at one extreme, but there are several reasons we don't have one, and won't ever have one under a Republican or Democratic administration.</p><p>
Writ large: people want low gas prices.</p><p>
A free market is happy with any price. &nbsp;As we all know, a free market just connects buyers and sellers, finding a spot of agreement between the two.</p><p>
I'm probably not being as clear as I should (on my first cup of coffee), but the big missing element of any honest "free market" plan is that it does not come with any price guarantee. &nbsp;It should come with a disclaimer: "you are on your own, scope out what energy prices will be in the next few years, and make your consumer decisions (cars, houses, appliances, commutes) accordingly.</p><p>
I'm really afraid that what we are getting is free market (in the background) but with a veneer of (phony) commitments that we'll have low gasoline prices, or that pollution-free hydrogen cars will save us.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>plans</strong></p><p>I try to keep a flexible mind, and parse out the various plans we might have, and their implications.</p><p>
There is certainly a "free market plan" at one extreme, but there are several reasons we don't have one, and won't ever have one under a Republican or Democratic administration.</p><p>
Writ large: people want low gas prices.</p><p>
A free market is happy with any price. &nbsp;As we all know, a free market just connects buyers and sellers, finding a spot of agreement between the two.</p><p>
I'm probably not being as clear as I should (on my first cup of coffee), but the big missing element of any honest "free market" plan is that it does not come with any price guarantee. &nbsp;It should come with a disclaimer: "you are on your own, scope out what energy prices will be in the next few years, and make your consumer decisions (cars, houses, appliances, commutes) accordingly.</p><p>
I'm really afraid that what we are getting is free market (in the background) but with a veneer of (phony) commitments that we'll have low gasoline prices, or that pollution-free hydrogen cars will save us.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by odograph</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 20:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>waking up</strong></p><p>I'm afraid the government, with their phony commitments to future solutions, only enables and supports bad consumer decisions by the bulk of the population today.</p><p>
They think there is a plan to save them.</p><p>
I suppose some even have enough cognitive dissonance to think there is a plan, and a free market, to save them.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>waking up</strong></p><p>I'm afraid the government, with their phony commitments to future solutions, only enables and supports bad consumer decisions by the bulk of the population today.</p><p>
They think there is a plan to save them.</p><p>
I suppose some even have enough cognitive dissonance to think there is a plan, and a free market, to save them.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by odograph</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:00:49 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/cheney-accelerates-administration-walkback-from-sotu-energy-claims/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Venezuela<p>The full article is available in Venezuela:<p>
<a href="http://www.thedailyjournalonline.com/article.asp?ArticleId=223199&amp;CategoryId=13303" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailyjournalonline.com/article.asp?ArticleId=223199&amp;CategoryId=13303</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Venezuela<p>The full article is available in Venezuela:<p>
<a href="http://www.thedailyjournalonline.com/article.asp?ArticleId=223199&amp;CategoryId=13303" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedailyjournalonline.com/article.asp?ArticleId=223199&amp;CategoryId=13303</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>