<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Big Oil and Big Auto get into a war of words]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Bart Anderson</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:41:38 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Typo.</strong></p><p>Great set of entries today in Gristmill.</p><p>
In one passage in this entry: "Apparently the ad infuriated many oil execs, and they're getting ready for a coordinated response. Vines' was just the first sally." &nbsp;I think you mean "auto industry execs" instead of "oil execs".</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Typo.</strong></p><p>Great set of entries today in Gristmill.</p><p>
In one passage in this entry: "Apparently the ad infuriated many oil execs, and they're getting ready for a coordinated response. Vines' was just the first sally." &nbsp;I think you mean "auto industry execs" instead of "oil execs".</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by David Roberts</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 07:59:05 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good catch, Bart</strong></p><p>Fixed.

<p>www.grist.org</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good catch, Bart</strong></p><p>Fixed.

<p>www.grist.org</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:20:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the history of renewables</strong></p><p>There is a serious history wanting to be written, about how the development of renewable sources of energy has been suppressed, stifled, dominated, controlled, by the big petroleum players. &nbsp;Along with their allies in coal and automobiles. &nbsp;Wind, solar, geo-thermal, tidal, etc., will never get anywhere, until the petroleum companies are sure they will come out ahead.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the history of renewables</strong></p><p>There is a serious history wanting to be written, about how the development of renewable sources of energy has been suppressed, stifled, dominated, controlled, by the big petroleum players. &nbsp;Along with their allies in coal and automobiles. &nbsp;Wind, solar, geo-thermal, tidal, etc., will never get anywhere, until the petroleum companies are sure they will come out ahead.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by GRLCowan</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:44:37 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/catfight/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>They will, though ...<p>when they can sell energy as cheaply, and give as much of the proceeds to government and still get by, as "the big petroleum players".<p>
Maybe they'll never be able to pull in taxes the way gas pumps do; those are after all sin taxes, and it would gall providers of non-sinful energy to have to pay them. That's always been nuclear's problem; and its advance shows that much as the oil interests wish to suppress it, they can't.<p>
(In this connection it's important to understand that through taxation, all those on government paycheques collectively are one of "the big petroleum players"; the biggest by far, in fact.)<p>
--- Graham Cowan, former hydrogen fan<br>
B: <a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html" rel="nofollow">internal combustion, nuclear cachet</a></br></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>They will, though ...<p>when they can sell energy as cheaply, and give as much of the proceeds to government and still get by, as "the big petroleum players".<p>
Maybe they'll never be able to pull in taxes the way gas pumps do; those are after all sin taxes, and it would gall providers of non-sinful energy to have to pay them. That's always been nuclear's problem; and its advance shows that much as the oil interests wish to suppress it, they can't.<p>
(In this connection it's important to understand that through taxation, all those on government paycheques collectively are one of "the big petroleum players"; the biggest by far, in fact.)<p>
--- Graham Cowan, former hydrogen fan<br>
B: <a href="http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html" rel="nofollow">internal combustion, nuclear cachet</a></br></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>