<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Carbon trading vs. carbon taxes on Science Friday]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-trading-vs-carbon-taxes-on-science-friday/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:39:56 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-trading-vs-carbon-taxes-on-science-friday/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uhhh</strong></p><p>If you had read some of the entries here and on related blogs, you would realize many of us have already moved on to solutions.</p><p>
We actually advocate for specific technologies and economic and political strategies to get the job done. Just thought you main stream media-ites might want to know that.</p><p>
Illustrious entities such as Hillary and Canada have employed one of them. &nbsp;Cutting subsidies for fossil fuel corporations and diverting the savings to tax credits for consumers who put part of &nbsp;their disposable income into &nbsp;renewable energy and conservation.</p><p>
Raising taxes is political suicide. &nbsp;Trading carbon indulgencies doesn't seem to be cutting GHGs.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uhhh</strong></p><p>If you had read some of the entries here and on related blogs, you would realize many of us have already moved on to solutions.</p><p>
We actually advocate for specific technologies and economic and political strategies to get the job done. Just thought you main stream media-ites might want to know that.</p><p>
Illustrious entities such as Hillary and Canada have employed one of them. &nbsp;Cutting subsidies for fossil fuel corporations and diverting the savings to tax credits for consumers who put part of &nbsp;their disposable income into &nbsp;renewable energy and conservation.</p><p>
Raising taxes is political suicide. &nbsp;Trading carbon indulgencies doesn't seem to be cutting GHGs.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>