<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Less grift, more grist?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ajguse</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:37:53 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good Point.</strong></p><p>Couldn't agree more. &nbsp;Cap-n-trade and tax schemes would in principle have similar incentive and welfare effects IF the rights were auctioned off. &nbsp;However, I think its safe to assume that as a practical matter we can expect a competetive auction with substantially less than 100% probability. &nbsp;One need only look at the list of actors now pushing for a trading scheme for proof. &nbsp;</p><p>
Now that it is clear that CO2 taxes are superior to cap-n-trade schemes, I am looking forward to the day when the debate shifts to how to spend the revenue. &nbsp;I.e. which taxes should be reduced? &nbsp;There is still room for legitimate debate between knowledgable people on this front.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good Point.</strong></p><p>Couldn't agree more. &nbsp;Cap-n-trade and tax schemes would in principle have similar incentive and welfare effects IF the rights were auctioned off. &nbsp;However, I think its safe to assume that as a practical matter we can expect a competetive auction with substantially less than 100% probability. &nbsp;One need only look at the list of actors now pushing for a trading scheme for proof. &nbsp;</p><p>
Now that it is clear that CO2 taxes are superior to cap-n-trade schemes, I am looking forward to the day when the debate shifts to how to spend the revenue. &nbsp;I.e. which taxes should be reduced? &nbsp;There is still room for legitimate debate between knowledgable people on this front.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:44:40 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This obviously isn't a science<p>We are at the mercy of bone-head politicians in either case to implement whichever scheme wins out, or both. How badly will they screw the one they choose up?

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This obviously isn't a science<p>We are at the mercy of bone-head politicians in either case to implement whichever scheme wins out, or both. How badly will they screw the one they choose up?

<p>In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. <a href="http://www.poisondarts.net" rel="nofollow">Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Gar Lipow</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:39:22 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-taxes-are-harder-to-scam-than-emissions-trading-schemes/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How badly</strong></p><p>A carbon tax takes more work to mess up than a cap and trade system. So the answer is "less with a carbon tax than with cap and trade".</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>How badly</strong></p><p>A carbon tax takes more work to mess up than a cap and trade system. So the answer is "less with a carbon tax than with cap and trade".</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>