<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Could the unthinkable become thinked?]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ffletcher</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-tax-news/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:52:14 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-tax-news/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good Measure</strong></p><p>Any one who believes global warming is a serious matter should support this legislation at the Federal level. &nbsp;We have to begin the process of valuing CO2 emission no matter what the source or how dependent a region is upon an energy source.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Good Measure</strong></p><p>Any one who believes global warming is a serious matter should support this legislation at the Federal level. &nbsp;We have to begin the process of valuing CO2 emission no matter what the source or how dependent a region is upon an energy source.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Gary Gifford</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-tax-news/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:21:44 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/carbon-tax-news/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Awesome news</strong></p><p>I'm glad a policy maker has the balls to propose the Carbon tax. &nbsp;Isn't he the one who was brave enough recently to admit to being an athiest as well?</p><p>
If this bill has any prayer of ever coming to fruition, we need to quit calling it a "Carbon Tax". &nbsp;It needs to be framed not as a new tax but as a different way of paying taxes we are already paying. &nbsp;Rewarding work and punishing polluters, and revenue neutrality need to be emphasized in talking points....And we must quit using the term "carbon tax".

<p>Cheers,
Gary Gifford</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Awesome news</strong></p><p>I'm glad a policy maker has the balls to propose the Carbon tax. &nbsp;Isn't he the one who was brave enough recently to admit to being an athiest as well?</p><p>
If this bill has any prayer of ever coming to fruition, we need to quit calling it a "Carbon Tax". &nbsp;It needs to be framed not as a new tax but as a different way of paying taxes we are already paying. &nbsp;Rewarding work and punishing polluters, and revenue neutrality need to be emphasized in talking points....And we must quit using the term "carbon tax".

<p>Cheers,
Gary Gifford</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>