<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Joseph Romm&#8217;s critique of EDF&#8217;s contest is misguided]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Brad Johnson</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/bizarre-no-tough-yes/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:33:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/bizarre-no-tough-yes/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The real lesson <p>Is that EDF has a ridiculous amount of money. 

<p><a href="http://www.thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/" rel="nofollow">The Wonk Room</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The real lesson <p>Is that EDF has a ridiculous amount of money. 

<p><a href="http://www.thinkprogress.org/wonkroom/" rel="nofollow">The Wonk Room</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Ken Johnson</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/bizarre-no-tough-yes/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:54:07 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/bizarre-no-tough-yes/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This isn't about educating the public ...</strong></p><p>... It's just about marketing, about coming up with some catchy, simplistic slogan that people can mimic like parrots without knowing what they're talking about. </p><p>
If you want to convey some sense of the economic realities (not just academic "modeling results"), then try to explain this: We've already got a marginal incentive of about $400/ton to reduce fuel consumption (based on what gasoline costs), about ten times typical C&amp;T trading prices (and actually about 100X the current RGGI auction price). So why isn't that incentive sufficient to reduce our petroleum dependence?<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>This isn't about educating the public ...</strong></p><p>... It's just about marketing, about coming up with some catchy, simplistic slogan that people can mimic like parrots without knowing what they're talking about. </p><p>
If you want to convey some sense of the economic realities (not just academic "modeling results"), then try to explain this: We've already got a marginal incentive of about $400/ton to reduce fuel consumption (based on what gasoline costs), about ten times typical C&amp;T trading prices (and actually about 100X the current RGGI auction price). So why isn't that incentive sufficient to reduce our petroleum dependence?<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>