Guess what?  Even the United Nations special rapporteur on the right to food is now asking that biofuel production be halted for at least five years, saying that using crops for biofuels instead of food "a major cause for the food crisis that has thrown millions into poverty."

People who don't want to give up their environmentally and ecologically destructive lifestyles refuse to believe that they are those lifestyles are the causes of the problems.  Instead, they fantasize about magical technological solutions that will allow them to continue business and play as usual.  In this universe, you can't have your cake and eat it, too, and all actions have equal and opposite reactions.  This means that unless people stop, or at least greatly reduce, their travel at unnatural speeds in private motor vehicles, the problems caused by that travel will never be solved.  And for those concerned about global warming, biofuels do absolutely nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Lester Brown wrote a piece about this issue a couple of years ago, before Congress decided to hand out billion dollar subsidies to corn based ethanol producers.

Making fuel from food won't work.  If you converted all of the corn grown in the USA to ethanol it won't offset 25% of our imported oil consumption.

And if you do, what do the cows, chickens, hogs eat?  Not to mention the several billion folks around the world who rely on grains as their primary source of nutrition.

Governor Perry has the right idea, even if it is for the wrong reasons.

Regarding the words of wisdom from the Secretary of State, Rice is a grain not a brain.

It's important to remember that meat production has also fueled the scourge of world hunger. On average, it takes more than seven pounds of grain to produce one pound of beef, and four pounds of grain to yield one pound of pork. More than 80 percent of US agricultural land is cultivated for animal feed.

Considering this, even a small shift toward a plant-based diet in developed countries would free up enough land, water, and fuel to stave off world hunger.

ron,

Admittedly, corn ethanol is not it. I think most everyone knows that by now. Imho there isnt one. As for the cows and hogs, we could do w/ a hell of a lot less of those methane factories anyway. The percent of the American diet they comprise is wholly unsustainable in many ways, be it caloric efficiency, acres required, GHG's. Its an issue of carrying capacity vs. cultural carrying capacity as I'm sure you're well aware...

Through their geospatial analysis, the USGS says the dead zone in the Gulf is mostly attributed to corn and soybean farming. How much of this is for ethanol and how much of it is to keep our dominion on the world in effect. We export the majority of the world's corn to all the developing world's displaced farmers, who now cant even afford it, only because of the billions in subsidies that have been in place for a number of years.

i should add...they are the same subsidies that displaced the farmers i mentioned in the first place....you know, the ones we now have to spend a few billion more on a border wall for, just because they followed the stick after the carrot was yanked out of their reach

is that you ron?

What's often missed in food-fuel discussions is that most midwestern corn is virtually inedible. Bred for big endosperm, small germ, it has very little protein, but makes cattle fat fast (50% of the corn crop goes to cattle) and cooks into lots of hi-fructose corn syrup or distills into ethanol.

We grow little food in the American midwest. For cuts in corn-based ethanol to impact food prices, US farmers would have to profit from growing crops for human consumption again.