<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Everything you need to know about Berkeley&#8217;s innovative rooftop solar program]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ahmednewenergy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:49:10 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the new MEME<p>RIGHT ON BERKELEY. &nbsp;Increasingly, I think that this is an important MEME that needs to redefine how we look at residential solar -- comparing it to cell phone use, and the fact that nobody in their right mind would want to build the actual infrastructure that supports the network. &nbsp;It's the same with soalr. &nbsp;WE ONLY WANT THE BENEFITS (through service plans).<p>
As my fascination for all things solar has increased in the past 18 months, another great source of news that I've come to love and trust is <p>
<a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greentechmedia.com/<p>
as always &nbsp;-- thanks for the good reporting</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the new MEME<p>RIGHT ON BERKELEY. &nbsp;Increasingly, I think that this is an important MEME that needs to redefine how we look at residential solar -- comparing it to cell phone use, and the fact that nobody in their right mind would want to build the actual infrastructure that supports the network. &nbsp;It's the same with soalr. &nbsp;WE ONLY WANT THE BENEFITS (through service plans).<p>
As my fascination for all things solar has increased in the past 18 months, another great source of news that I've come to love and trust is <p>
<a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greentechmedia.com/<p>
as always &nbsp;-- thanks for the good reporting</p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:46:38 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Subprime Loans for Solar Panels</strong></p><p><br>
This is the same finagling that got us into the subprime problem.</p><p>
Government will "help" put consumers and itself into debt by having them both buy 2008 grade solar panels.</p><p>
But guess what...just like with real estate, prices will fall precipitously in the next years and decades to the point where someone can walk into Home Depot and buy a complete energy system for the price of a good hot water heater.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Subprime Loans for Solar Panels</strong></p><p><br>
This is the same finagling that got us into the subprime problem.</p><p>
Government will "help" put consumers and itself into debt by having them both buy 2008 grade solar panels.</p><p>
But guess what...just like with real estate, prices will fall precipitously in the next years and decades to the point where someone can walk into Home Depot and buy a complete energy system for the price of a good hot water heater.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Pangolin</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:05:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Unfortunately regressive. <p>For the very large percentage of residents of Berkeley that rent there is exactly zero direct benefit. I don't see why their landlords would take on higher tax bills in order to benefit tenants. <p>
If the Green transition is going to be anything other than another brand like a Volvo in the driveway it needs to benefit the whole spectrum of the population. <p>
Municipal financed solar power for the wealthy isn't exactly very green. Rework it and include some means of converting rental properties to solar power and it won't end up being another "socialism for the wealthy" issue. 

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Unfortunately regressive. <p>For the very large percentage of residents of Berkeley that rent there is exactly zero direct benefit. I don't see why their landlords would take on higher tax bills in order to benefit tenants. <p>
If the Green transition is going to be anything other than another brand like a Volvo in the driveway it needs to benefit the whole spectrum of the population. <p>
Municipal financed solar power for the wealthy isn't exactly very green. Rework it and include some means of converting rental properties to solar power and it won't end up being another "socialism for the wealthy" issue. 

<p><a href="http://putcarbonback.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Put  the Carbon Back</a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>good point, Pangolin</strong></p><p>As a former renter in Berkeley (long ago!) I appreciate the thought. &nbsp;Helping renters is a big, big problem. &nbsp;I don't think Berkeley's program is only for the wealthy, I think &nbsp;a lot of middle-class people own their own homes there, but something definitely needs to be done for rental units -- don't know of any proposals for that, though.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>good point, Pangolin</strong></p><p>As a former renter in Berkeley (long ago!) I appreciate the thought. &nbsp;Helping renters is a big, big problem. &nbsp;I don't think Berkeley's program is only for the wealthy, I think &nbsp;a lot of middle-class people own their own homes there, but something definitely needs to be done for rental units -- don't know of any proposals for that, though.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by ciscodv</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:55:13 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Renters</strong></p><p>This is a good point and a difficult problem to solve as most renters pay their own utility bill for just their unit. &nbsp;</p><p>
However, most multi-family buildings have central hot water heating that is maintained and paid for by the property owner. &nbsp;This type of financing can be used by property owners of multi-family buildings to install solar thermal water heating. &nbsp;This would reduce natural gas use substantially and, therefore, the owner's utility bill would go down.</p><p>
It's a start, anyway.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Renters</strong></p><p>This is a good point and a difficult problem to solve as most renters pay their own utility bill for just their unit. &nbsp;</p><p>
However, most multi-family buildings have central hot water heating that is maintained and paid for by the property owner. &nbsp;This type of financing can be used by property owners of multi-family buildings to install solar thermal water heating. &nbsp;This would reduce natural gas use substantially and, therefore, the owner's utility bill would go down.</p><p>
It's a start, anyway.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by DrOct</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:56:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Renters not the issue here.</strong></p><p>The issue of landlords not having an incentive to install such things for renters is certainly a concern, but it's pretty much irrelevant to this program. Landlords don't have any incentive to install solar panels now. &nbsp;So we're no worse off in that regard with or without this program. AND we're better off in that there will likely be more people installing solar/wind/whatever the local community decides to support. &nbsp;(I could also mention that making it easier for people to pay for such things will drive up demand, thus increasing investment, research and economies of scale which will all eventually bring down the price for everyone).</p><p>
This program is about making it easier for people to pay for installing solar panels. &nbsp;Incentivizing landlords to install such things on rental properties is more or less a separate issue. &nbsp;An issue worth exploring, but basically irrelevant to this program.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Renters not the issue here.</strong></p><p>The issue of landlords not having an incentive to install such things for renters is certainly a concern, but it's pretty much irrelevant to this program. Landlords don't have any incentive to install solar panels now. &nbsp;So we're no worse off in that regard with or without this program. AND we're better off in that there will likely be more people installing solar/wind/whatever the local community decides to support. &nbsp;(I could also mention that making it easier for people to pay for such things will drive up demand, thus increasing investment, research and economies of scale which will all eventually bring down the price for everyone).</p><p>
This program is about making it easier for people to pay for installing solar panels. &nbsp;Incentivizing landlords to install such things on rental properties is more or less a separate issue. &nbsp;An issue worth exploring, but basically irrelevant to this program.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by David Roberts</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:15:41 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Also</strong></p><p>Won't renewables and lower energy bills be a competitive advantage in the rental market? Couldn't you raise rent on a place with solar thermal water heating and solar electricity? Why wouldn't it be attractive to landlords?

<p>grist.org</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Also</strong></p><p>Won't renewables and lower energy bills be a competitive advantage in the rental market? Couldn't you raise rent on a place with solar thermal water heating and solar electricity? Why wouldn't it be attractive to landlords?

<p>grist.org</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Jon Rynn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:42:56 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/berkeley-rules/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If some of it is free...</strong></p><p>...sometimes rentals are "heat included", in my experience particularly in an apartment building, say if it's steam heat and everybody gets it, you can't measure it by apartment. &nbsp;Although that would be best for solar hot water heaters.</p><p>
For electricity it would be more difficult, because I've never heard of a rental where you get your electricity paid -- and having the landlord handle part of it probably would make it more difficult -- you'd get a refund monthly? Maybe your rent would go down? &nbsp;Hard to see how it would work, but as DrOct points out, we don't have to solve all problems at once.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>If some of it is free...</strong></p><p>...sometimes rentals are "heat included", in my experience particularly in an apartment building, say if it's steam heat and everybody gets it, you can't measure it by apartment. &nbsp;Although that would be best for solar hot water heaters.</p><p>
For electricity it would be more difficult, because I've never heard of a rental where you get your electricity paid -- and having the landlord handle part of it probably would make it more difficult -- you'd get a refund monthly? Maybe your rent would go down? &nbsp;Hard to see how it would work, but as DrOct points out, we don't have to solve all problems at once.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>