<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Battlefield earth]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by truffula</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:03:36 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>intentional?</strong></p><p>er... we are altering the entire planet's atmosphere relatively &nbsp;cheaply - in fact they tell us we can't afford not to<br>
..so if AGW is a weapon in the hands of the powers that be, who is it being aimed at?<br>
- us perhaps?</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>intentional?</strong></p><p>er... we are altering the entire planet's atmosphere relatively &nbsp;cheaply - in fact they tell us we can't afford not to<br>
..so if AGW is a weapon in the hands of the powers that be, who is it being aimed at?<br>
- us perhaps?</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by stevenearlsalmony</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:38:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The globalization of the American Dream...........<p>......is actually nothing more than a dream, is it not?<p>
What if the contrived logic of ideology is "blinding" denialists and naysayers to the virtual mountains of good scientific evidence of global warming as well as the unsustainability of the huge scale and global growth of human consumption, production and propagation rampantly overspreading Earth in these early years of Century XXI? <p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population, established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/<br>
</br></a></br></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The globalization of the American Dream...........<p>......is actually nothing more than a dream, is it not?<p>
What if the contrived logic of ideology is "blinding" denialists and naysayers to the virtual mountains of good scientific evidence of global warming as well as the unsustainability of the huge scale and global growth of human consumption, production and propagation rampantly overspreading Earth in these early years of Century XXI? <p>
Steven Earl Salmony<br>
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population, established 2001<br>
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/<br>
</br></a></br></br></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by JStack</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:28:18 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/battlefield-earth/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Maybe the Scariest Part...</strong></p><p>Lately I have heard many articles and other sources discuss this, with the debate driven by economists.</p><p>
Stuff like, "well, if we engineer an artificial Mount Pinatoubo, it'll only cost $50 Billion, just a month in Iraq, versus [actually conserving energy, etc....]."</p><p>
It really seems that we are facing a sort of peak economics, that will break as peak oil begins cresting."</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Maybe the Scariest Part...</strong></p><p>Lately I have heard many articles and other sources discuss this, with the debate driven by economists.</p><p>
Stuff like, "well, if we engineer an artificial Mount Pinatoubo, it'll only cost $50 Billion, just a month in Iraq, versus [actually conserving energy, etc....]."</p><p>
It really seems that we are facing a sort of peak economics, that will break as peak oil begins cresting."</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>