<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for &#8220;Back to Petroleum&#8221;: BP shuts clean energy HQ, slashes renewables budget, dives into tar sands]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Sean Casten</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:03:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Worth noting that the economics of the oil majors are driven largely by their upstream exploration &amp; production operations.&nbsp; Refining is a very low margin business, and retailing is often a money loser, driven by profits not on gasoline but slim jims.&nbsp; E&amp;P makes the money because the production costs - of any given field - are essentially fixed while the price bounces around with the market.&nbsp; Ergo, if you own a low-cost field and the price is high, you make Beaucoups Petrodollars.</p><p>My personal sense from the folks I've talked to at BP is that they were genuinely committed to clean energy, but no less committed to looking after their shareholders.&nbsp; The whole Beyond Petroleum business was formed when oil markets were low and the engine of an integrated oil major was sputtering.&nbsp; In other words, there was no conflict between their clean energy commitment and their shareholder commitment.&nbsp; But once the oil price started shooting up a couple years ago, those commitments came into conflict with each other.&nbsp;</p><p>Bottom line is that if there's more money to be made in clean energy than in petroleum, I think BP will go there.&nbsp; The fact that they've concluded they have higher returns in their current business may be unfortunate, but I don't think it makes them quite as cynical as you suggest.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Worth noting that the economics of the oil majors are driven largely by their upstream exploration &amp; production operations.&nbsp; Refining is a very low margin business, and retailing is often a money loser, driven by profits not on gasoline but slim jims.&nbsp; E&amp;P makes the money because the production costs - of any given field - are essentially fixed while the price bounces around with the market.&nbsp; Ergo, if you own a low-cost field and the price is high, you make Beaucoups Petrodollars.</p><p>My personal sense from the folks I've talked to at BP is that they were genuinely committed to clean energy, but no less committed to looking after their shareholders.&nbsp; The whole Beyond Petroleum business was formed when oil markets were low and the engine of an integrated oil major was sputtering.&nbsp; In other words, there was no conflict between their clean energy commitment and their shareholder commitment.&nbsp; But once the oil price started shooting up a couple years ago, those commitments came into conflict with each other.&nbsp;</p><p>Bottom line is that if there's more money to be made in clean energy than in petroleum, I think BP will go there.&nbsp; The fact that they've concluded they have higher returns in their current business may be unfortunate, but I don't think it makes them quite as cynical as you suggest.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by RisingTideNA</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:53:39 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Aren't you glad BP is a lead author (via their membership in USCAP) of the climate legislation in congress?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Aren't you glad BP is a lead author (via their membership in USCAP) of the climate legislation in congress?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by solargroupies</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:26:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-to-petroleum-bp-shuts-clean-energy-hq-slashes-renewables-budget-dives-/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>All of those years of hopeful commercials we have been watching for nothing? This underscores how economics and only economics will drive change towards a green economy.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>All of those years of hopeful commercials we have been watching for nothing? This underscores how economics and only economics will drive change towards a green economy.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>