<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for House passes Amtrak authorization by veto-proof margin]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by archigeek</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:47:15 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>'Bout time...</strong></p><p>Good, maybe they'll finally fix the escalators at the Columbia Heights station. I don't live in DC, but my GF and I have friends there who live two(!) blocks from the station, and a couple of the escalators were disassembled a few years ago and left that way...until our last visit this April when we discovered that they had been reassembled, but still remained inoperative. 

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>'Bout time...</strong></p><p>Good, maybe they'll finally fix the escalators at the Columbia Heights station. I don't live in DC, but my GF and I have friends there who live two(!) blocks from the station, and a couple of the escalators were disassembled a few years ago and left that way...until our last visit this April when we discovered that they had been reassembled, but still remained inoperative. 

<p>The mellotron is your friend.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by gildone</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:08:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>major point of Amtrak bill is missed</strong></p><p>There was far more important stuff in this bill than just re-authorizing Amtrak. &nbsp;The bill (along with it's counterpart S. 294, makes some basic, necessary reforms to Amtrak's structure and most importantly, it finally makes intercity passenger rail eligible for the same type of federal matching funds for capital investment as highways and aviation. &nbsp;The federal government pays for 80% of road and airport project. &nbsp;Finally, now rail will get equal treatment. &nbsp;</p><p>
Bush has said he will veto this bill. &nbsp;Fortunately, it passed in both the house and senate with a veto-proof majority. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>major point of Amtrak bill is missed</strong></p><p>There was far more important stuff in this bill than just re-authorizing Amtrak. &nbsp;The bill (along with it's counterpart S. 294, makes some basic, necessary reforms to Amtrak's structure and most importantly, it finally makes intercity passenger rail eligible for the same type of federal matching funds for capital investment as highways and aviation. &nbsp;The federal government pays for 80% of road and airport project. &nbsp;Finally, now rail will get equal treatment. &nbsp;</p><p>
Bush has said he will veto this bill. &nbsp;Fortunately, it passed in both the house and senate with a veto-proof majority. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by GonzoDon</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:21:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>$14.9 billion dollars ...</strong></p><p>... let's see ... that's roughly the amount that we spend on Bush's ill-fated war in Iraq every seven weeks or so, correct?</p><p>
So. &nbsp;Bush wants to veto the Amtrak bill because exactly why, now? &nbsp;Because we can't afford it? &nbsp;Because it represents an "irresponsible" expenditure of public tax dollars?</p><p>
Even though the Amtrak bill (unlike the Iraq spending) would represent dollars spent on a <b>lasting infrastructure</b> in our <b>own country</b> that would help provide alternatives to our <b>growing dependence on Middle-Eastern oil</b>? &nbsp;(And incidently reduce greenhouse gas emissions?)</p><p>
Yeah. &nbsp;Okay. &nbsp;I guess I see the outrageousness of the whole Amtrak folly. &nbsp;Bush is right. &nbsp;Let's just keep poring those billions of dollars down that big 'ol goddamn Iraqi rat-hole where's it's obviously been doing us so much good. &nbsp;No sense in squandering it on something as imperfect as Amtrak!</p><p>
Bush and his neocon friends are such assholes. &nbsp;And I say that with all due respect.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>$14.9 billion dollars ...</strong></p><p>... let's see ... that's roughly the amount that we spend on Bush's ill-fated war in Iraq every seven weeks or so, correct?</p><p>
So. &nbsp;Bush wants to veto the Amtrak bill because exactly why, now? &nbsp;Because we can't afford it? &nbsp;Because it represents an "irresponsible" expenditure of public tax dollars?</p><p>
Even though the Amtrak bill (unlike the Iraq spending) would represent dollars spent on a <b>lasting infrastructure</b> in our <b>own country</b> that would help provide alternatives to our <b>growing dependence on Middle-Eastern oil</b>? &nbsp;(And incidently reduce greenhouse gas emissions?)</p><p>
Yeah. &nbsp;Okay. &nbsp;I guess I see the outrageousness of the whole Amtrak folly. &nbsp;Bush is right. &nbsp;Let's just keep poring those billions of dollars down that big 'ol goddamn Iraqi rat-hole where's it's obviously been doing us so much good. &nbsp;No sense in squandering it on something as imperfect as Amtrak!</p><p>
Bush and his neocon friends are such assholes. &nbsp;And I say that with all due respect.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Toji</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:14:46 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>high speed rail</strong></p><p>I wond why they are still not debating about a countrywide high speed rail network. A lot of other nations around the world use it as a fast and reliable transportation system - independent of oil. America should start building one now, because oil prices are going to rise even more in the next years.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>high speed rail</strong></p><p>I wond why they are still not debating about a countrywide high speed rail network. A lot of other nations around the world use it as a fast and reliable transportation system - independent of oil. America should start building one now, because oil prices are going to rise even more in the next years.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by xen13</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:20:35 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/back-on-the-train-again/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Finally, some progress!</strong></p><p>Lets hope its contagious.<br>
I "live" in Southern Calif. these days and find it reprehensible that I can't get to the (very cool) Bay Area from LA in under 10 frakin' hours!<br>
If I drive its only 5 to 6 hours, but if I could train it in 3 hours... &nbsp;Oh Baby.</p><p>
People are crying for a decent train network linking this state's cities. &nbsp;They want relief from driving &amp; commuter air like it was a migraine.</p><p>
Back east, Amtrak's killer Acela line runs the NE Corridor like a sprinter from DC to NYC in under 4 hours.</p><p>
There's still no line from LA to Vegas, and that would pay for itself (and other projects)in the first year alone.</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Finally, some progress!</strong></p><p>Lets hope its contagious.<br>
I "live" in Southern Calif. these days and find it reprehensible that I can't get to the (very cool) Bay Area from LA in under 10 frakin' hours!<br>
If I drive its only 5 to 6 hours, but if I could train it in 3 hours... &nbsp;Oh Baby.</p><p>
People are crying for a decent train network linking this state's cities. &nbsp;They want relief from driving &amp; commuter air like it was a migraine.</p><p>
Back east, Amtrak's killer Acela line runs the NE Corridor like a sprinter from DC to NYC in under 4 hours.</p><p>
There's still no line from LA to Vegas, and that would pay for itself (and other projects)in the first year alone.</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>