<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Hard-knock New England city welcomes region&#8217;s largest solar installation]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 05:12:38 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>UTC Doing Geothermal Power<p>Once again you take any chance to slam the President, even though his policy correct.<p>
You say:<p>
But the budget also calls for the zeroing out of all funding for promising geothermal and hydropower technologies.<p>
The reason given is that these are mature technologies that don't need bootstrap funding. &nbsp; <p>
Absolutely right.<p>
Take geothermal...it's being promoted by UTC...United Technologies...a company that most Libs would not want to get more funding -- but UTC is making alternative energy, fuel cells, hydrogen and geothermal work commercially!<p>
<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17524&amp;ch=energy" rel="nofollow">http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=1752...<p>
Engineers at the United Technologies Research Center (UTRC), a unit of United Technologies based in East Hartford, CT, say they have developed a low-cost system that can utilize low-temperature geothermal resources.<p>
It's the Enviro-Libs worst nightmare! &nbsp; Large commercial corporations like General Motors and UTC delivering clean, renewable fuel! &nbsp; No wonder Al Gore is pissed...corporate America just ate his lunch!<br>
</br></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>UTC Doing Geothermal Power<p>Once again you take any chance to slam the President, even though his policy correct.<p>
You say:<p>
But the budget also calls for the zeroing out of all funding for promising geothermal and hydropower technologies.<p>
The reason given is that these are mature technologies that don't need bootstrap funding. &nbsp; <p>
Absolutely right.<p>
Take geothermal...it's being promoted by UTC...United Technologies...a company that most Libs would not want to get more funding -- but UTC is making alternative energy, fuel cells, hydrogen and geothermal work commercially!<p>
<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17524&amp;ch=energy" rel="nofollow">http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=1752...<p>
Engineers at the United Technologies Research Center (UTRC), a unit of United Technologies based in East Hartford, CT, say they have developed a low-cost system that can utilize low-temperature geothermal resources.<p>
It's the Enviro-Libs worst nightmare! &nbsp; Large commercial corporations like General Motors and UTC delivering clean, renewable fuel! &nbsp; No wonder Al Gore is pissed...corporate America just ate his lunch!<br>
</br></p></p></a></p></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by jhaygood</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:00:58 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The buck stops over there</strong></p><p>He's the President, so theoretically he's accountable for what happens on his watch. &nbsp;And while I'm not an expert on the energy budget (by any means), only $148 million in the federal budget to cover solar, geothermal &amp; hydro? &nbsp;THAT seems like the problem to me. &nbsp;And if 'mature technologies' don't get funding, I suppose that means oil, gas and nuclear have been zeroed out, too... </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>The buck stops over there</strong></p><p>He's the President, so theoretically he's accountable for what happens on his watch. &nbsp;And while I'm not an expert on the energy budget (by any means), only $148 million in the federal budget to cover solar, geothermal &amp; hydro? &nbsp;THAT seems like the problem to me. &nbsp;And if 'mature technologies' don't get funding, I suppose that means oil, gas and nuclear have been zeroed out, too... </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Biodiversivist</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:37:13 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uh, that is not a liberal's nightmare</strong></p><p>that is a liberal's dream.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Uh, that is not a liberal's nightmare</strong></p><p>that is a liberal's dream.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:39:10 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>research and development</strong></p><p>It is anti-intellectual to think that developments in deep-earth geothermal energy collection and oceanic hydropower are over and done, just because the simpler technologies for geothermal and hydropower right now seems to have plateaued. &nbsp;Researchers who understand in an out-of-the-box way the real potential of those energy sources should not starve, just because the research dollars depend on what can make a profit soon. &nbsp;In the same category belongs the potential for atmospheric collectors of solar energy.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>research and development</strong></p><p>It is anti-intellectual to think that developments in deep-earth geothermal energy collection and oceanic hydropower are over and done, just because the simpler technologies for geothermal and hydropower right now seems to have plateaued. &nbsp;Researchers who understand in an out-of-the-box way the real potential of those energy sources should not starve, just because the research dollars depend on what can make a profit soon. &nbsp;In the same category belongs the potential for atmospheric collectors of solar energy.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/baard1/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Zero-out science</strong></p><p>During his first year, Bush "Zeroed-out solar concentrator research". &nbsp;That closed the forum of objective reviews, retired adult supervision, and consigned young ideas to internal exile.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Zero-out science</strong></p><p>During his first year, Bush "Zeroed-out solar concentrator research". &nbsp;That closed the forum of objective reviews, retired adult supervision, and consigned young ideas to internal exile.<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>