<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Apollo Alliance now shooting for the statehouse instead of the moon]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by crb</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/apollo1/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 03:27:33 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/apollo1/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>state actions</strong></p><p>Muckraker:</p><p>
Reading this article, one might get the impression that Apollo can claim (or is claiming) primary responsibility for passage of the recent PA RPS or the California Greenwave Initiative. Are there details to share about their involvement in these initiatives, the two main "successes" pointed to in this article? I wonder how Phil Angelides or the CalPERS/STRS staff might react to the suggestion that Apollo was a motivating force of any significant degree or that their voice somehow rose above the broad chorus of supporters for Pennsylvania or any other recent RPS legislation.</p><p>
Bold initiatives that can reframe the debate are critical and needed. Concrete and measurable actions are as well. Blurring the two does a disservice to each.</p><p>
- Skeptical<br>
</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>state actions</strong></p><p>Muckraker:</p><p>
Reading this article, one might get the impression that Apollo can claim (or is claiming) primary responsibility for passage of the recent PA RPS or the California Greenwave Initiative. Are there details to share about their involvement in these initiatives, the two main "successes" pointed to in this article? I wonder how Phil Angelides or the CalPERS/STRS staff might react to the suggestion that Apollo was a motivating force of any significant degree or that their voice somehow rose above the broad chorus of supporters for Pennsylvania or any other recent RPS legislation.</p><p>
Bold initiatives that can reframe the debate are critical and needed. Concrete and measurable actions are as well. Blurring the two does a disservice to each.</p><p>
- Skeptical<br>
</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>