<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Obama clean-energy ad will air during Olympics coverage]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by David Roberts</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:23:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>McCain's ...</strong></p><p>... is of course that slimy negative ad about Obama.

<p>grist.org</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>McCain's ...</strong></p><p>... is of course that slimy negative ad about Obama.

<p>grist.org</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:42:40 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Energy Plan: Obama vs McCain<p>Here's the Obama vs McCain energy programs side by side.<br>
<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gGj1oIfYmFMaIMlkarP4RqJksKtgD92EQ1SO0" rel="nofollow">http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gGj1oIfYmFMaIMlkarP4Rq ...<p>
No real reference to how much Federal spending McCain wants to kick into Nuclear/CCS though. &nbsp;Although in the LiebermanWarner bill he was arguing for $500 Billion.<br>
<a href="http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2007/10/30/friends-of-the-earth-excoriates-lieberman-warner-polluter-giveaways" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2007/10/30/friends-of-th ...<br>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/13/9422/98276" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/13/9422/98276

<p>-David Ahlport</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Energy Plan: Obama vs McCain<p>Here's the Obama vs McCain energy programs side by side.<br>
<a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gGj1oIfYmFMaIMlkarP4RqJksKtgD92EQ1SO0" rel="nofollow">http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gGj1oIfYmFMaIMlkarP4Rq ...<p>
No real reference to how much Federal spending McCain wants to kick into Nuclear/CCS though. &nbsp;Although in the LiebermanWarner bill he was arguing for $500 Billion.<br>
<a href="http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2007/10/30/friends-of-the-earth-excoriates-lieberman-warner-polluter-giveaways" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillheat.com/articles/2007/10/30/friends-of-th ...<br>
<a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/13/9422/98276" rel="nofollow">http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/5/13/9422/98276

<p>-David Ahlport</p></a></br></a></br></p></a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:32:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/an-ad-campaign-of-olympic-proportions/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;fuel-efficient vehicles&quot;</strong></p><p>of course can mean a number of different things. &nbsp;Obama would perhaps say it is not up to the US president (i.e., himself) to say what the "next generation" should be, specifically, only to promote its successful birth: "Let a hundred flowers bloom; let the hundred schools of thought contend."</p><p>
In the accompanying shot, was that a Prius being built? &nbsp;In a cartoon that I recently saw, as a kind of parody of the classic eco-prankster bumper sticker to be surreptitiously stuck onto an SUV, "I'm destroying the planet! &nbsp;Ask me how!," a Prius is shown bearing the bumper sticker, "I'm destroying the planet too!, only not so fast." 

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;fuel-efficient vehicles&quot;</strong></p><p>of course can mean a number of different things. &nbsp;Obama would perhaps say it is not up to the US president (i.e., himself) to say what the "next generation" should be, specifically, only to promote its successful birth: "Let a hundred flowers bloom; let the hundred schools of thought contend."</p><p>
In the accompanying shot, was that a Prius being built? &nbsp;In a cartoon that I recently saw, as a kind of parody of the classic eco-prankster bumper sticker to be surreptitiously stuck onto an SUV, "I'm destroying the planet! &nbsp;Ask me how!," a Prius is shown bearing the bumper sticker, "I'm destroying the planet too!, only not so fast." 

<p>Chickens deserve our true friendship!  So do fish!  So do other sentient beings!  Let us learn to be kind.</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>