<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for All of the above minus one]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Wolverine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/all-of-the-above-minus-one/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:55:35 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/all-of-the-above-minus-one/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Can't Win&quot;</strong></p><p>As I've argued many times, including here, people, including politicians, should take the positions in which they actually believe, not the ones they think they can win. &nbsp;Obama and the Dems should still oppose drilling, but they need to spend some money to explain their reasons, which I haven't seen aside from slogans like "we can't drill our way to heaven" or whatever. &nbsp;How about airing some videos showing oiled water and birds, polluted air, destruction of habitat, etc. in prime time on the most watched TV channels? &nbsp;You don't know whether the Dems and Obama could win that argument when they haven't even really tried.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Can't Win&quot;</strong></p><p>As I've argued many times, including here, people, including politicians, should take the positions in which they actually believe, not the ones they think they can win. &nbsp;Obama and the Dems should still oppose drilling, but they need to spend some money to explain their reasons, which I haven't seen aside from slogans like "we can't drill our way to heaven" or whatever. &nbsp;How about airing some videos showing oiled water and birds, polluted air, destruction of habitat, etc. in prime time on the most watched TV channels? &nbsp;You don't know whether the Dems and Obama could win that argument when they haven't even really tried.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>