<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Al Gore&#8217;s slideshow]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by hank</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/al-gores-slideshow/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:53:53 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/al-gores-slideshow/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Exactly slides used for movie? Confirm please?</strong></p><p>This was just pointed to by Russell Seitz posting in the comments at RealClimate. &nbsp;Can you all confirm this collection matches the slides used in the movie? &nbsp;I know one point of the movie was that Mr. Gore was changing his slideshow as he was shown doing on his laptop, between presentations.</p><p>
Question arises because of the recent British court case referring to quote "errors" unquote. &nbsp;Can this collection be used to accurately check what was actually in the movie?</p><p>
As an aside, it'd also be wonderful to have a difference file, showing what's changed. &nbsp;The movie is an old snapshot, yet it's being circulated as though it were the best available information.</p><p>
Using the movie to teach from, without a difference file to update it, is falling into the "Founder" trap that's so attractive to those who, for example, attack "Darwinists" -- those who believe science can be argued with by pointing to some founder's early work and claiming everything else is based on some grand original.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Exactly slides used for movie? Confirm please?</strong></p><p>This was just pointed to by Russell Seitz posting in the comments at RealClimate. &nbsp;Can you all confirm this collection matches the slides used in the movie? &nbsp;I know one point of the movie was that Mr. Gore was changing his slideshow as he was shown doing on his laptop, between presentations.</p><p>
Question arises because of the recent British court case referring to quote "errors" unquote. &nbsp;Can this collection be used to accurately check what was actually in the movie?</p><p>
As an aside, it'd also be wonderful to have a difference file, showing what's changed. &nbsp;The movie is an old snapshot, yet it's being circulated as though it were the best available information.</p><p>
Using the movie to teach from, without a difference file to update it, is falling into the "Founder" trap that's so attractive to those who, for example, attack "Darwinists" -- those who believe science can be argued with by pointing to some founder's early work and claiming everything else is based on some grand original.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>